In July, Crypto Card Spending Increased by 2.5 Times to $759 Million

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-18Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-18

Анотація

In July 2026, spending on cryptocurrency-linked payment cards soared 2.5 times year-over-year to reach $759 million. This surge was driven by 9 million purchases, up from 5.2 million transactions in July 2025, with an average purchase value of around $86. The primary driver was U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins, which accounted for 84% of all tracked spending. USDC held a 58% share, while USDT accounted for 26%. This marks a significant increase from the previous year when their combined share was 55%. Adjusted transaction volume grew 63% from May and 125% from June 2025, despite a $7.7 billion contraction in the overall stablecoin market. Meanwhile, the popularity of euro-pegged tokens plummeted from 88% in early 2024 to just 2% by July 2026. The Optimism blockchain led in processing these card transactions with a 29% share, followed by Solana and Base at 19% each. Despite the notable growth, the volume of crypto card transactions remains modest compared to traditional payment systems, which process trillions of dollars monthly.

In July 2026, spending using cryptocurrency payment cards increased by 2.5 times compared to the same period last year, reaching $759 million.

Such impressive results were achieved thanks to 9 million purchases, which is significantly higher than the 5.2 million transactions in July 2025. The average cost per purchase was about $86.

The main drivers behind this surge were U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins. $USDC and $USDT accounted for 84% of all tracked expenditures. The share of $USDC was 58%, and $USDT was 26%. For comparison, a year earlier, these assets accounted for 48% and 7%, respectively.

The adjusted transfer volume increased by 63% compared to May and by 125% compared to June 2025, despite the total market value of stablecoins decreasing by $7.7 billion. Meanwhile, the popularity of euro-pegged tokens sharply declined from 88% at the beginning of 2024 to 2% by July 2026.

The leading blockchain for payments was Optimism (29% of crypto card transactions), followed by Solana and Base with 19% each. Despite the noticeable growth, the volume of cryptocurrency card transactions remains modest compared to traditional payment systems, which process trillions of dollars in transfers monthly.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QBy how much did spending on cryptocurrency payment cards increase in July 2026 compared to the same period last year, and what was the final spending amount?

AIn July 2026, spending on cryptocurrency payment cards increased by 2.5 times compared to July 2025, reaching a total of $759 million.

QWhat was the average cost of a single purchase made with crypto cards in July 2026?

AThe average cost of a single purchase made with crypto cards in July 2026 was approximately $86.

QWhich two stablecoins were primarily responsible for the surge in crypto card spending, and what was their combined share of tracked expenses?

AThe surge was primarily driven by USDC and USDT, which together accounted for 84% of all tracked expenses. USDC had a 58% share, while USDT had a 26% share.

QHow did the popularity of euro-backed tokens for crypto card payments change from early 2024 to July 2026?

AThe popularity of euro-backed tokens for crypto card payments sharply declined from 88% in early 2024 to just 2% by July 2026.

QWhich blockchain was the leader for crypto card transactions in July 2026, and what was its share?

AIn July 2026, Optimism was the leading blockchain for crypto card transactions, handling 29% of them.

Пов'язані матеріали

Is the Signal That Triggered During Previous Bitcoin Bull Rallies Repeating? Warning!

Cryptocurrency analysis platform CryptoQuant reports that Bitcoin is approaching a critical level based on the MVRV Z-Score indicator, but the current situation does not yet confirm the start of a new bull market. The Z-Score is nearing its 365-day moving average, a key level that has historically signaled a market regime shift. Historically, a sustained break above this 365-day moving average signaled a transition from a recovery phase to an expansion phase, preceding major bull markets in 2017 and 2020-2021. Currently, however, the indicator remains below this average. A confirmed break and hold above it could signal renewed unrealized network profit and the start of a new growth period. Conversely, a rejection from this level might indicate insufficient overall market profitability to support a broader bull rally. The analysis notes a key difference from past cycles: during previous major cyclical lows, the MVRV Z-Score fell below zero into undervalued territory, which has not occurred in the recent correction. This could suggest Bitcoin is undergoing a structurally shallower correction or that a capitulation event on the scale of past macro lows is not yet complete. Additionally, the Z-Score has formed lower peaks in each successive cycle, indicating that market valuation excesses are becoming more constrained over time even if price reaches new highs. For a bullish scenario to materialize, according to CryptoQuant, the MVRV Z-Score must recover and sustain above its 365-day moving average. A bounce rejection would suggest the market is in a "recovery" mode, while a return of the indicator toward zero could reinforce the view that the current correction is not yet over.

cryptonews.ru25 хв тому

Is the Signal That Triggered During Previous Bitcoin Bull Rallies Repeating? Warning!

cryptonews.ru25 хв тому

Morpho Stablecoin Yield Strategy: Same Curator, 3.96% vs. 7.7% Return Gap

**Summary of "Morpho Stablecoin Yield Strategy: 3.96% vs 7.7% from the Same Curator"** This article analyzes a yield opportunity on Morpho, a permissionless lending protocol, where depositors can bypass curated vaults to directly supply stablecoins to individual lending pools for higher returns. The core observation is a significant yield gap: a conservative vault managed by "Steakhouse Financial" offers a 7-day average APY of 3.96%, while its higher-risk vault offers 5.09%. Meanwhile, directly depositing into a specific pool (USDC / PT-reUSD-10DEC2026), which several professional vaults like Steakhouse also invest in, yields approximately 7.7%. This ~3.7 percentage point premium compensates depositors for assuming the specific collateral risk (a structured asset expiring Dec 10, 2026) and forgoing the diversification, monitoring, and emergency actions provided by vault managers. The article details the risks: 1) Concentrated exposure to a single collateral type with potential de-pegging or expiry risks. 2) Low immediately withdrawable liquidity (only 5% of the pool's supply), meaning exits may require queuing. 3) No professional oversight for the pool. Key operational advice includes: * Using the number of reputable vaults invested in a pool as a primary filter (for exclusion, not endorsement). * Always calculating the "landed" APY based on one's deposit size and the pool's utilization rate, rather than trusting the listed rate. * Pre-defining strict exit signals (e.g., 2 weeks before collateral expiry, if liquidity falls below a threshold, or if the yield premium narrows). * Acknowledging that the arbitrage window will close as more capital flows into direct pools or product interfaces improve. The analysis concludes that at current low Ethereum gas fees, the cost barrier for this strategy is minimal (~$160 minimum viable position), making risk tolerance—not cost—the deciding factor. The premium represents payment for taking on risks that professional vaults choose to avoid for their conservative products.

marsbit37 хв тому

Morpho Stablecoin Yield Strategy: Same Curator, 3.96% vs. 7.7% Return Gap

marsbit37 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片