Bitcoin Price Stabilizes Around $63,400 Following Minor Drop in US Inflation Rate

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-12Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-12

Анотація

Bitcoin's price stabilized around $63,400, showing unusual calm after two days of declines. The sell-off, partly triggered by bitcoin sales from the company Strategy, appears to have eased. While price briefly spiked above $64,400, it quickly fell back. Market capitalization held steady at $1.27 trillion. Bitcoin found some support from the latest US inflation data, which showed a slight cooling in July. However, analysts note high energy prices could limit faster disinflation. Strategy's CEO downplayed recent sales, stating they represent a small fraction of the company's holdings and that more active buying is planned for later in the year. Despite the positive inflation news, blockchain analytics firm Glassnode warned the market's muted reaction is a cautionary signal. They noted a lack of strong buyer demand, leaving Bitcoin trapped between key price levels and vulnerable if trading volume remains low.

After two consecutive days of decline, Bitcoin mostly traded sideways on Wednesday as the sell-off triggered by the latest Bitcoin sales by Strategy appeared to have subsided. Market data shows that from Tuesday afternoon until early Wednesday morning, Bitcoin mostly traded below the $63,800 level. However, shortly after 5 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST), a sharp rally pushed the cryptocurrency above $64,000, reaching a daily high just above $64,400.

This was followed by an equally sharp sell-off, dropping Bitcoin to $63,317 before it rebounded slightly above the $63,400 mark. Bitcoin was trading at nearly the same price level as it was 24 hours earlier—a rare occurrence for an asset widely considered one of the most volatile in recent years.

As a result of the stable price action, Bitcoin's market capitalization remained unchanged at $1.27 trillion, with its seven-day decline at 2%. In the derivatives market, liquidation volume was moderate at $32.3 million, with long positions accounting for $20.5 million of the total. Overall crypto market liquidation volume exceeded $153.2 million, of which $86.6 million came from short positions and $66.7 million from long positions.

Although Strategy CEO Fong Le had previously defended the company's Bitcoin sales, he sought to alleviate concerns that the company is becoming a net seller. In a recent interview, Le indicated that for the remainder of 2026, the company would return to more active Bitcoin purchases. The CEO also downplayed the recent sales, noting that the sold Bitcoins constitute only a small portion of the 175,000 Bitcoins the company has acquired since the beginning of the year.

In addition to Le's reassurances, the leading cryptocurrency received minor support from US inflation data indicating easing price pressures in July. Data shows the Consumer Price Index (CPI) declined to 3.4%, slightly below June's 3.5%. However, economists noted that as long as energy prices remain elevated, prospects for faster inflation reduction remain limited. The latest data likely also complicates the Federal Reserve's task ahead of the September Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting.

Blockchain analytics firm Glassnode offered a cautious assessment of the market's muted reaction to the CPI release, noting that a weak response to positive economic news is itself a warning signal. According to Glassnode, sellers appear to be tiring, while buyers are still largely absent, leaving Bitcoin stuck between its median realized price of $63,000 and the short-term holder cost basis of $68,700.

The company warned that if demand does not pick up against a favorable inflation backdrop, the market remains vulnerable to excessively leveraged long positions amid low spot trading volume.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QAt what approximate price level did Bitcoin stabilize according to the article's title?

ABitcoin stabilized at around $63,400.

QWhat event was cited as a factor leading to the end of a recent sell-off in Bitcoin?

AThe sell-off caused by Strategy's recent Bitcoin sales appears to have come to an end.

QWhat was the reported U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) figure for July mentioned in the article?

AThe CPI for July decreased to 3.4%, slightly lower than the 3.5% rate in June.

QWhat concern did the blockchain analytics firm Glassnode express regarding the market's reaction to the CPI data?

AGlassnode expressed caution, noting that the weak market reaction to favorable economic news is itself a warning signal, indicating that sellers seem to be getting tired while buyers remain largely absent.

QWhat did Strategy's CEO, Fong Le, indicate about the company's Bitcoin trading strategy for the remainder of 2026?

AFong Le indicated that the company would return to more active Bitcoin purchases for the remainder of 2026, attempting to dispel concerns that it was becoming a net seller.

Пов'язані матеріали

1confirmation: Reverse Entrepreneurship, the Next Web3 Blockbuster Might Come from a Once-Failed Track

**Title: Reverse Entrepreneurship: The Next Web3 Blockbuster May Come from Previously Failed Tracks** This article argues that the next major consumer crypto application is likely to emerge from a concept that failed five years ago, now benefiting from matured infrastructure and better timing. It examines several such "failed" tracks that hold renewed potential: 1. **Internet-Native Assets:** Beyond simply tokenizing tweets or creating digital collectibles, there's an opportunity to create a genuinely new, crypto-native asset class that captures cultural moments and online phenomena, as opposed to merely tokenizing real-world assets (RWA). 2. **X-to-Earn:** While unsustainable token emission models doomed early projects like STEPN, the core premise that most people will first *earn* crypto, not buy it, remains valid. The future challenge is designing what is earned and why users would hold it long-term. 3. **The Metaverse:** Past failures like Decentraland stemmed from trying to replicate the physical world online. The opportunity lies not in abandoning shared online social spaces, but in reimagining their form beyond real-world analogs. 4. **DAOs:** DAOs have underdelivered by overcomplicating governance. The fundamental, unmet user need is simpler: enabling groups of internet strangers to pool funds and collectively achieve goals (e.g., buying assets, funding projects) that are impossible individually. 5. **Personal Value Tokenization:** Numerous attempts (Friend.tech, BitClout) to create markets around individuals have failed. The enduring demand for "person-as-asset" trading (seen in meme coins, prediction markets) suggests the direction isn't wrong, but the execution has been flawed, often lacking creator consent or a less commodified model. The conclusion is that true innovation will come from revisiting these past ideas with new insights, rather than crowding into currently popular trends.

marsbit12 хв тому

1confirmation: Reverse Entrepreneurship, the Next Web3 Blockbuster Might Come from a Once-Failed Track

marsbit12 хв тому

Liang Wenfeng Launches Surprise Attack on Musk: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs. Grok 4.6, First Tests Are Spectacular

**DeepSeek V4 Pro vs. Grok 4.6: A Benchmark and Real-World Showdown** In a dramatic AI clash, DeepSeek V4 Pro and Elon Musk's Grok 4.6 launched head-to-head, targeting long-task capabilities like tool calling and code validation. **Benchmark Performance:** DeepSeek V4 Pro excelled in Agent tests, topping CyberGym (83.3) and AutomationBench (31.8), surpassing models like Fable 5 and Claude Opus 4.8. It closed the gap on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (87.9) and saw massive gains in DeepSWE (software engineering). Grok 4.6 matched GPT-5.6 in overall ability (61 index), outperformed it in coding (CursorBench 69.9%), and led in three knowledge-work evaluations, including legal tasks (Harvey LAB, 15.8%). **Pricing Disruption:** DeepSeek's standout feature is its radically low cost: $0.87 per million output tokens—roughly 1/7th of Grok 4.6 ($6) and a tiny fraction of rivals like Fable 5 ($50). **Real-World Tests:** In practical challenges, both models demonstrated impressive skill. DeepSeek V4 Pro built a 3D interactive Earth, websites, 60 design styles, and a polished Flappy Bird clone (costing only $0.019 vs. Grok's $0.03 for a simpler version). Head-to-head comparisons were tight: Grok 4.6 won on some design aesthetics, while DeepSeek often delivered higher visual detail and completeness. However, in complex tasks like generating a Three.js cherry blossom tree, V4 Pro lagged behind GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5. **Conclusion:** The simultaneous release signals a shift: high-end AI capability is becoming dramatically more affordable. DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.6 now compete directly with top-tier models from OpenAI and Anthropic, promising to democratize powerful AI tools and fuel an application explosion. The race continues, with Grok 4.7 and counter-moves from incumbents already anticipated.

marsbit26 хв тому

Liang Wenfeng Launches Surprise Attack on Musk: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs. Grok 4.6, First Tests Are Spectacular

marsbit26 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片