$35 Billion Loss: OpenAI Star Leopold Aschenbrenner Sells His Trading Portfolio

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-31Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-31

Анотація

Hedge fund Situational Awareness LP, founded by former OpenAI employee Leopold Aschenbrenner, sold off its entire portfolio of public stocks—both long and short positions—in a single block trade to Ken Griffin's Citadel in late July 2026. This reduced the fund's assets from a peak of roughly $45 billion earlier that month to about $10 billion. The forced sale was triggered by significant losses from a steep drop in AI infrastructure stocks like SK Hynix and adverse moves in short positions on software names such as Adobe. Prime brokers Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan Chase issued margin calls, compelling the liquidation. Launched after Aschenbrenner's 2024 departure from OpenAI, the fund had previously reported stellar returns, including a 439% net gain for H1 2026. Its major public holdings, which included Nebius Group, Sandisk, Micron, and CoreWeave, all fell over 30-35% in July 2026. The fund will continue operating with its private investments, notably a stake in Anthropic valued at approximately $5 billion. The incident highlights the risks of concentrated leverage in the AI sector and draws parallels to the 2021 collapse of Archegos Capital Management, underscoring systemic vulnerabilities when multiple prime brokers face simultaneous margin calls.

The hedge fund Situational Awareness LP, founded by Leopold Aschenbrenner, sold its entire portfolio of public stocks—both long and short positions—in one large transaction. The buyer was Ken Griffin's Citadel fund. Following the deal, Situational Awareness's assets dropped to approximately $10 billion.

Margin Calls and Forced Sell-off

According to sources familiar with the situation, at the beginning of July 2026, the fund's assets under management were valued at around $45 billion. In recent weeks, it suffered significant losses due to the decline in shares of companies related to artificial intelligence infrastructure, including SK Hynix, as well as adverse movements in its short positions on software stocks such as Adobe. The fund's prime brokers—Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan Chase—demanded additional collateral to meet margin requirements, forcing the managers to sell off the public portfolio.

From Record Returns to Losses

Aschenbrenner launched Situational Awareness after leaving OpenAI in 2024. The fund quickly gained investor attention thanks to its high returns: a letter dated July 24, 2026, indicated a net return of 439% for the first half of 2026 and 1551% since the fund's inception.

Largest Holdings

As of the end of the first quarter of 2026 (per 13F filing data), the fund's portfolio included shares of:

  • Nebius Group;
  • Sandisk;
  • Micron;
  • CoreWeave.

In July 2026, all four stocks fell by more than 30–35%.

The fund retains its private investments, including a stake in Anthropic valued at approximately $5 billion, and will continue to operate as a private investment vehicle—now without a public portfolio.

Role of Citadel and Other Players

The transaction with Citadel closed around July 30–31, 2026, following negotiations that also involved other market players, including Millennium.

The outcome of the deal highlights the scale of the correction in the artificial intelligence infrastructure-related stock market and the risks of margin leverage for hedge funds betting on this sector. The future activities of Situational Awareness are now limited to its private holdings, including its stake in Anthropic, with no access to the public stock market.

AI Perspective

In terms of macroeconomic connections, the Situational Awareness case is reminiscent of the story of Archegos Capital Management, which in March 2021 failed to meet margin calls and triggered a sell-off of positions exceeding $20 billion—several large banks, including Nomura and Credit Suisse, incurred losses from trades with that fund at the time. The mechanism is similar: concentrated bets placed through multiple prime brokers create hidden systemic leverage, invisible to any single counterparty until a drop in stock prices triggers a chain reaction of margin calls.

A technical aspect the article does not address is the question of creditor priority. The Archegos experience demonstrates that banks that are the first to sell the positions of a troubled client minimize their own losses, while those who are late bear the brunt of the sell-off. In the current deal, the three prime brokers demanded collateral almost simultaneously, reducing the room for such maneuvering. Whether the private stake in Anthropic will remain isolated from the cascade risks of concentrated bets on AI infrastructure, or whether similar cases will become a regular feature of the cycle, is a question worth keeping in view.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the main reason for the forced sale of Leopold Aschenbrenner's hedge fund's public portfolio?

AThe forced sale was primarily due to substantial losses from falling AI infrastructure stocks and adverse moves in software short positions, which triggered margin calls from the fund's prime brokers (Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase), requiring additional collateral.

QWho purchased the public portfolio from the Situational Awareness LP fund, and what was the approximate value of the fund's assets after the deal?

AThe public portfolio was purchased by Ken Griffin's Citadel. After the deal, the assets of Situational Awareness LP fell to approximately $10 billion.

QWhat major historical hedge fund collapse does the article compare the Situational Awareness LP case to, and what is the key similarity mentioned?

AThe article compares it to the collapse of Archegos Capital Management in March 2021. The key similarity is the mechanism of concentrated bets through multiple prime brokers creating hidden systemic leverage, invisible to any single counterparty until a price drop triggers a chain reaction of margin calls.

QWhich private investment does the Situational Awareness fund retain after selling its public portfolio, and what is its estimated value?

AThe fund retains its private investments, including a stake in Anthropic, which is valued at approximately $5 billion.

QWhat were the fund's reported net returns for the first half of 2026 and since its inception, as mentioned in a July 2026 letter?

AAccording to a letter dated July 24, 2026, the fund reported a net return of 439% for the first half of 2026 and a 1551% return since its inception.

Пов'язані матеріали

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit1 год тому

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit1 год тому

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit1 год тому

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit1 год тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731) provides a curated selection of deep analysis, filtering out market noise. Key themes from this week include: **Macro & Policy:** The Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting is marked by high uncertainty, balancing cooling inflation data against persistent price pressures. Meanwhile, the U.S. crypto regulatory Clarity Act faces critical political hurdles, with its 2026 passage probability seen as low. **Investing & Crypto:** Analysis suggests long-term crypto success depends on conviction through volatile cycles, focusing on assets like Bitcoin and core smart contract platforms. A trend noted is the increasing similarity between global equity markets (especially tech) and crypto, driven by narrative and leverage. Several major crypto protocols show strong revenue growth, but this isn't always translating to token price appreciation due to sell pressure and structural factors. **AI & Semiconductors:** Nvidia's rising credit default swap rates signal market concern over AI infrastructure financing risks. The storage sector experienced volatility as markets began pricing in potential 2027 oversupply. Despite a record profitable quarter, SK Hynix's results were deemed "below expectations," reflecting heightened investor demands for future growth visibility. **Markets & DeFi:** TradeXYZ demonstrated remarkable accuracy in pre-market pricing for a major A股 listing. The token ONDO saw gains, linked to its growing role in the on-chain tokenized stock ecosystem. **Ethereum:** Post-Pectra upgrade, a major structural shift is underway as Lido begins migrating millions of ETH to new validator architectures designed for capital efficiency. **Also Highlighted:** Butian's bullish stock market move; OpenAI's Altman promising major advances; Samsung and SK Hynix securing large AI chip deals; Apple reaching a $5T market cap; and ongoing discussions around exchange security following Poolin's bankruptcy case.

marsbit1 год тому

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

marsbit1 год тому

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

While Meta and Google face investor scrutiny over ballooning AI capital expenditures, Apple's minimal AI investment has paradoxically become a strength. Its market cap recently reclaimed the global top spot, surpassing $5 trillion. The irony is deep: Apple's own AI efforts have lagged, with "Apple Intelligence" delayed and core talent lost, forcing reliance on partners like Google Gemini and Alibaba's Qianwen. Its Q3 FY2026 (Q2 CY) earnings initially seemed stellar. Revenue hit $109.4B (up 16% YoY), with iPhone and Mac sales, growing 22% and 29% respectively, driving most of the growth. However, the stock fell over 8% post-earnings. The primary concern was a weaker Q4 revenue growth forecast of 9-11%, below expectations, due to looming supply chain constraints. Apple is feeling the indirect cost of the AI boom. Soaring memory and chip prices, fueled by massive data center investments from Microsoft, Amazon, and others, are forcing Apple to raise Mac and iPad prices significantly. The upcoming iPhone launch is also expected to see substantial price hikes. Despite avoiding heavy AI infrastructure spending—its capital expenditures are actually down 28%—Apple cannot escape the industry-wide supply and cost pressures. While Apple's operating cash flow remains robust, its substantial R&D spending (up 32% YoY) has yet to yield major AI breakthroughs. As Tim Cook prepares to step down as CEO, Apple faces a challenging transition: balancing its premium hardware success against the strategic and cost pressures of the AI era it has so far cautiously navigated.

marsbit2 год тому

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片