Fidelity Assesses the Limits of AI's Influence on the Crypto Market

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-20

Анотація

Fidelity Analysts Assess the Limits of AI's Impact on the Crypto Market Fidelity Digital Assets senior analyst Max Waddington notes that AI agents could become a new source of activity in the digital asset sector, from payments to trading and lending. However, the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. Fidelity's study of over 100,000 GitHub developers shows AI coding assistants increased commit counts by up to 180% and releases by 30%. These tools enable smaller teams to build blockchain applications faster, though critical financial software still requires manual code review. In the crypto industry itself, developer counts fell in 2026 amid lower prices, but commits per developer continued to rise. Waddington cautions that more applications don't guarantee success; user adoption, liquidity, compliance, and trust remain key. Autonomous AI agents, capable of payments, trading, liquidity provision, and lending, are emerging as another driver. Blockchains are suitable due to 24/7 operation and programmable settlements. According to Keyrock, AI agents had already conducted over 176 million transactions worth more than $73 million by May, predominantly using USDC. Infrastructure is developing, with Coinbase launching tools like the x402 protocol and 'Coinbase for Agents'. However, Fidelity expects agents to use multiple platforms (both public blockchains and traditional finance systems) based on cost and convenience. A surge in AI-driven transactions may not proportion...

AI agents could become a new source of activity for the digital asset sector—from payments to trading and lending. The benefits from this will be distributed unevenly among market participants, believes Max Waddington, Senior Analyst at Fidelity Digital Assets.

Developers Are Using AI More Frequently

Fidelity studied data from over 100,000 GitHub developers. The use of digital programming assistants increased the number of commits by up to 180% and the number of releases by 30%.

Source: Fidelity.

Waddington noted that such tools will allow small teams to build and launch blockchain applications faster. However, in financial and other critical software, code still requires manual review.

A similar trend was observed within the crypto industry itself. In 2026, against the backdrop of declining digital asset prices, both the number of developers and the volume of commits decreased, with the latter indicator falling more slowly. As a result, the average number of changes per developer continued to grow.

At the same time, an increase in the number of applications alone does not guarantee their success. Projects still need users, liquidity, regulatory compliance, and trust. According to Waddington, as development becomes cheaper, these factors will come to the forefront.

AI Agents Will Go On-Chain

Autonomous AI agents could become an additional driver of activity in the sector. They are capable of independently making payments, trading assets, providing liquidity, as well as issuing and taking loans.

Blockchains are suitable for such operations due to 24/7 operation, programmable settlements, and the ability to conduct microtransactions without human involvement.

This market is already taking shape. According to Keyrock, by May, AI agents had conducted over 176 million transactions worth more than $73 million. About 98.6% of the operations involved the USDC stablecoin.

Infrastructure for such scenarios is also developing. One of the most active players here is the exchange Coinbase, which previously launched the x402 protocol for automatic internet payments and later introduced Coinbase for Agents—a set of tools for trading and settlements using AI.

Nevertheless, Fidelity does not expect all agent operations to migrate to public blockchains. Banks, fintech companies, and traditional players are developing their own solutions, possessing an established customer base, infrastructure, and access to credit products.

In the view of analysts, AI agents will most likely work with multiple platforms simultaneously, choosing between them based on cost and convenience.

What are AI agent payments (agentic payments)?

Transaction Growth Does Not Guarantee Revenue Growth

Even if AI attracts millions of new operations to blockchains, this will not necessarily lead to a proportional increase in revenue for the networks themselves.

As an example, experts cited payments: their number can grow rapidly, but the fee per transaction remains low. Such transactions can also be batched, conducted off the main network, or moved to cheaper L2 solutions.

Operations with capital generate much more significant revenue. According to Fidelity's calculations, over the last 180 days, trading brought the base layer of Ethereum 49 times more revenue per dollar of volume than payments. Additional revenue is also created through MEV.

Source: Fidelity.

This is why analysts see greater potential in AI agents that will trade, lend, borrow, and provide liquidity. In the case of mass adoption of automatic payments, the main beneficiaries may be stablecoin issuers and infrastructure providers, rather than the native tokens of blockchains.

Recall that in March, specialists at Bernstein named digital assistants as the future of stablecoins. Later, Franklin Templeton noted that AI agents could become a driver of crypto payments.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the Fidelity analysis mentioned in the article, what are the two main areas of crypto market activity that AI agents could significantly impact?

AAccording to the Fidelity analysis, AI agents could significantly impact two main areas: 1) Development of blockchain applications by increasing developer productivity, and 2) On-chain activity through autonomous operations like payments, trading, lending, and providing liquidity.

QWhat key finding about developer productivity using AI assistants did Fidelity's study of GitHub data reveal?

AThe study of over 100,000 GitHub developers revealed that the use of AI coding assistants increased the number of code commits by up to 180% and boosted the number of software releases by 30%.

QWhy does the article suggest that a surge in AI-driven transactions might not proportionally increase blockchain networks' revenue?

AThe article suggests this because many AI-driven activities, like payments, generate low fees per transaction. Furthermore, these transactions can be batched, processed off-chain, or moved to cheaper Layer-2 solutions, limiting revenue for the base layer. Revenue from capital-based activities like trading is much more significant.

QWhat is the primary type of cryptocurrency used by AI agents for their on-chain transactions, according to data from Keyrock cited in the article?

AAccording to data from Keyrock cited in the article, approximately 98.6% of transactions conducted by AI agents used the stablecoin USDC.

QWhat does the article identify as a major challenge for new blockchain projects, which will become even more critical as AI lowers development costs?

AThe article identifies that attracting users, ensuring liquidity, complying with regulatory requirements, and building trust are the major challenges for new projects. As AI makes development cheaper, these factors will become the primary focus for success, rather than just the ability to create an application.

Пов'язані матеріали

Gold Diggers in Prediction Markets: From Competing for Trading Entrances to Competing for Outcome Definition Rights

The report identifies a shift in prediction market competition from front-end user acquisition to back-end infrastructure, specifically the "outcome layer." This layer encompasses the standardized services for rule comparison, evidence verification, outcome confirmation, and payment triggering. Analysis shows that while a tiny fraction (0.487%) of markets face disputes, they account for a significant share (8.64%) of traded volume. This highlights the financial impact of rule uncertainty, which creates trading alpha but limits strategy capacity due to shallow order books. The larger opportunity lies in productizing these backend functions. Services like automated settlement (e.g., HIP-4), AI-assisted evidence processing, and external data oracles (e.g., Pyth, Chainlink) are becoming reusable, cross-platform infrastructure. This is creating a "second profit pool" separate from trading fees. Current observable revenue for this outcome layer is estimated at $15-37 million annually. If applied to the entire existing market, this could expand to $64-161 million. In a mature state, modeled after existing commercial models like Azuro's, annual revenue potential could reach approximately $456 million. While the industry logic is forming, pure-play investment assets are still early. Platform equities (e.g., Kalshi, Polymarket) price in broad growth, not just the outcome layer. Tokens like HYPE have minimal fee contribution from related products, and ICE's exposure is too small relative to its total business. The key is to track early projects that achieve cross-platform adoption and convert usage into attributable, recurring revenue. The most significant alpha may emerge before the ideal investment target is fully established.

marsbit30 хв тому

Gold Diggers in Prediction Markets: From Competing for Trading Entrances to Competing for Outcome Definition Rights

marsbit30 хв тому

Bitcoin Surpasses $72k. What Happens Next?

Bitcoin exceeded $72,000, reaching its highest level since early summer after a $8,000 surge. The broader crypto market followed, with total market capitalization rising 10%. Analysts attribute the rally to a combination of factors: the U.S. Treasury's decision to increase purchases of long-term government bonds, which lowers yields and makes riskier assets like crypto more attractive, and positive remarks about cryptocurrency from former President Donald Trump. Experts note that while Trump's comments provided an emotional boost, the Treasury's action was a more fundamental driver. However, they caution that significant sustained growth is not assured. High U.S. inflation limits the Federal Reserve's ability to ease policy, and network activity within crypto ecosystems remains low. Competition for capital from sectors like semiconductors and AI also persists. Analysts present mixed short-term forecasts. Some see resistance around $72,000; a breakout could target $76,000-$80,000, but a moderate, localized rise within a longer-term downward trend is deemed more likely. Others identify $69,000-$70,000 as a key support zone. A sustained move above $72,000 could open a path toward $75,000-$78,000, or even $80,000-$82,000 under a strong bullish scenario, with support expected around $66,000-$67,000 on any pullback. The overall outlook is cautiously optimistic, with the recent surge signaling improved sentiment, but a confirmed upward trend requires prices to solidify above current levels.

cryptonews.ru34 хв тому

Bitcoin Surpasses $72k. What Happens Next?

cryptonews.ru34 хв тому

Optimism Developers' Vote Deprives Users of $49 Million Airdrop

On August 19th, the Optimism community approved a proposal to reallocate 546.9 million OP tokens (worth ~$49.7 million) from a reserve for future user airdrops into a new Strategic Ecosystem Fund for development. The vote passed with 17.97 million OP for and 10.93 million against, with a decisive last-minute vote from developer group Test in Prod securing the majority. The funds will now be managed by the Optimism Foundation to foster ecosystem growth, targeting partnerships with blockchains, protocols, and financial firms, and attracting major brands. This marks a strategic shift from broad user acquisition via airdrops to focusing on corporate clients and enterprise solutions (OP Enterprise). The decision does not affect past airdrops, which distributed 269.1 million OP over five rounds. The proposal faced criticism. L2BEAT and delegate cp0x argued the Foundation gains overly broad discretion without sufficient detail on fund use, results measurement, or benefit to OP holders. Critics also noted these tokens were publicly reserved for future user distributions, and their reallocation removes the need for separate community votes on individual Foundation deals. Test in Prod defended its support, stating the reserve is needed for competitive corporate deals where premature disclosure could be detrimental, while urging the Foundation to later disclose aggregate spending and outcomes.

cryptonews.ru34 хв тому

Optimism Developers' Vote Deprives Users of $49 Million Airdrop

cryptonews.ru34 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片