BTC can remain sturdy in the final days of 2022 despite this let down from miners

AmbcryptoОпубліковано о 2022-12-19Востаннє оновлено о 2022-12-19

Анотація

BTC miners have been experiencing an uptrend in hashrate and difficulty with the revenue not corresponding. BTC price will not be impacted by miners sell-off, should it ever occur.

Over the last few days, Bitcoin [BTC] holders have been worried about the coin’s price declining further due to miners selling their holdings. How much of the BTC supply do miners own, and is it enough to impact the market in the event of a sell-off?

""

Bitcoin declines

""

Bitcoin rose to around $18,000 on 13 December, raising hopes for where the price may go by the end of 2022. However, following the release of the FOMC report, the price fell, and at the time of writing, BTC was trading at about $16,000.

""

According to the location of the Relative Strength Index (RSI) metric on the TradingView daily timeframe chart, BTC was in a negative trend. As of the time of this writing, the RSI was below the 50 line. What does this signify in terms of mining profits?

Source: TradingView

""

Network difficulty and hashrate up, revenue down

""

The Network Difficulty indicator revealed a sharp rise in the amount of network difficulty required to process blocks and mine BTC. The network difficulty reached an all-time high of over 36 Terahash from late November to early December, setting a record for the year.

""

The indicator was high even though it decreased at the time of writing, sitting around 34k. Additionally, an analysis of the total hashrate statistic revealed that it had experienced an upward trend.

""

The profitability of mining had been trending in the other direction over the months, despite increases in hashrate and network difficulties. The statistic revealed that miners’ revenue has been dropping in recent months. The income was about $44,000 as of January.

""

However, as of the most recent data, the revenue had dropped to about $16, making it less viable to resolve blocks and generate BTCs. The revenue decreased further due to Bitcoin’s ongoing decline, which has led to miners’ fears of a sell-off. But what impact could their sell-off have on the market?

Source: Blockchain.com

""

Miners reserve vs circulating supply

""

Looking at the volume may help determine the effect that a selloff may have on BTC. At the time of writing, miners held over 16,000 BTC, worth about $1.8 million, according to data from CryptoQuant.

""

A chart observation also revealed that the reserve had decreased over time, which is understandable considering the reduction in the price of BTC.

Source: CryptoQuant

""

Data from CoinMarketcap also indicated that there were currently approximately 19.2 million Bitcoins in circulation, which, at the current price, would be worth almost $300 billion. Therefore, if there is a sell-off of miners, the impact will be negligible, if any.

""

A further reduction in the price of BTC could be a possibility because, historically, equities and cryptocurrencies usually decline during this market period. This fall won’t be caused by a sell-off among miners, though.

""

365-days investors at a loss

""

An analysis of BTC’s profitability for investors who held it over the previous 365 days revealed that they were holding at a loss. The Market Value to Realized Value Ratio (MVRV) revealed that holders have been holding at a loss of over 32% over the previous 365 days.

Source: Santiment

Пов'язані матеріали

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

The U.S. Senate has taken a key step regarding the CLARITY Act, which could shape the future of the U.S. crypto market. On July 29, Senators Tom Tillis and Ruben Gallego finalized amendments to the bill's "conflict of interest" rules, one of its most contentious aspects. The bipartisan bill aims to tighten restrictions on high-level federal officials' ties to digital assets. The new text, crafted as an alternative to a White House-endorsed ethics code, is expected to impose stricter rules limiting officials' ability to issue or directly participate in digital asset projects. However, with Congress entering an August recess and the revised text not yet reviewed by much of the Senate, the bill's timeline is uncertain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated a procedural vote could occur between July 29 and August 1 but expressed doubt the full bill could pass before the break. The House-approved CLARITY Act, passed in July 2025, has been under Senate negotiation for over a year. Key goals of the CLARITY Act include clarifying jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, setting rules for digital commodity spot markets, and addressing topics like stablecoin yields, DeFi, and illicit financing. The stablecoin yield provisions could significantly impact U.S.-based DeFi protocols, exchanges, and issuers, affecting their global competitiveness. The outcome is being closely watched by both the U.S. and global digital asset markets.

cryptonews.ru31 хв тому

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

cryptonews.ru31 хв тому

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, has been added to Russia's list of terrorists and extremists by Rosfinmonitoring, as published on July 30. The entry includes his name and date of birth. The designation follows an announcement by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on July 29, which charged Durov with aiding terrorist activity. The FSB alleges that a Telegram dating bot named "DaiVinchik" was used to recruit 46 individuals for attacks on police and arson, orchestrated by Ukrainian special services. The FSB also accuses Telegram's administration of failing to remove channels and bots used by Ukrainian intelligence and extremist groups. Durov is reportedly subject to an international arrest warrant. Inclusion on the Rosfinmonitoring list leads to significant restrictions: the freezing of Durov's bank accounts and assets, severe limitations on financial transactions, and a ban on election participation, media interaction, and event organization. Transfers to his accounts may be considered terrorism financing. For ordinary Russian Telegram users, purchasing Telegram Premium is not classified as financing terrorism, according to an IT expert. General use of the messenger—messaging, managing channels—does not automatically make a user a participant in extremist activity. There has been no official decision to ban Telegram itself. It is noted that French authorities are also investigating Durov over allegations of inadequate measures against criminal activity on the platform and insufficient cooperation with law enforcement. Durov denies all charges.

cryptonews.ru40 хв тому

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

cryptonews.ru40 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片