Le directeur du OCC a promis de publier les règles définitives concernant GENIUS pour novembre

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-19Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-19

Анотація

Le contrôleur de la monnaie américain, Jonathan Gould, a annoncé que l'OCC publiera les règles définitives pour la mise en œuvre de la loi sur les stablecoins de paiement ($GENIUS) d'ici novembre. Ces règles finales interviendront avant l'entrée en vigueur de la loi en janvier 2027, permettant à l'OCC de commencer à traiter les demandes des émetteurs cette année-là. La loi $GENIUS, signée en juillet 2025, établit un cadre réglementaire fédéral pour les stablecoins et charge plusieurs agences, dont l'OCC et le Trésor, de développer des règles. Un projet de règles de 376 pages a été publié en février, suivi d'une consultation de l'industrie. Plusieurs régulateurs ont sollicité des commentaires mais n'ont pas encore publié de règles finales, créant une incertitude pour les émetteurs.

Le contrôleur de la monnaie américain, Jonathan Gould, a déclaré que son agence publierait les règles définitives pour la mise en œuvre de la loi sur les stablecoins de paiement d'ici novembre.

Lors d'une intervention mercredi au symposium sur la blockchain du Wyoming, le régulateur a annoncé qu'après la publication par le Bureau du contrôleur de la monnaie (OCC) du projet de règles pour la mise en œuvre de la loi sur les principes directeurs et la création d'innovations nationales pour les stablecoins américains ($GENIUS), l'OCC publiera les règles définitives avant l'entrée en vigueur de la loi en janvier 2027.

Gould a déclaré que l'OCC « publiera la règle finale d'ici novembre », car l'agence a examiné les commentaires de l'industrie cryptographique après la publication des règles proposées en février. Il a ajouté que, selon ses attentes, le régulateur pourra commencer à traiter les demandes des émetteurs de stablecoins en 2027.

La loi $GENIUS, signée en juillet 2025, vise à créer un cadre réglementaire aux États-Unis pour les stablecoins de paiement et oblige les agences gouvernementales qui supervisent ces produits, notamment l'OCC, le Département du Trésor, la Société fédérale d'assurance des dépôts (FDIC) et le Conseil des gouverneurs de la Réserve fédérale, à élaborer les règles correspondantes.

En février, l'OCC a publié un projet de règles de 376 pages pour la mise en œuvre de $GENIUS. Les agences gouvernementales ont jusqu'au 18 janvier, date d'entrée en vigueur de la loi, pour finaliser leurs réglementations. Plusieurs régulateurs ont déjà publié des projets et recueilli les commentaires du public concernant la mise en œuvre de $GENIUS, mais n'ont pas publié de règles définitives d'ici juillet, ce qui crée une incertitude réglementaire pour les émetteurs de stablecoins.

Sur le même sujet : L'OCC a approuvé la société cryptographique de la famille Trump pour obtenir une licence de fiducie

end-content

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Пов'язані питання

QQui a annoncé que l'OCC publiera les règles finales pour la loi GENIUS d'ici novembre ?

ALe contrôleur de la monnaie des États-Unis, Jonathan Gould, a annoncé que l'OCC publiera les règles finales pour la mise en œuvre de la loi sur les paiements en stablecoin GENIUS d'ici novembre.

QQuelle est l'échéance pour la mise en vigueur de la loi GENIUS aux États-Unis ?

ALa loi GENIUS doit entrer en vigueur aux États-Unis en janvier 2027.

QQuel était le contenu du projet de règles publié par l'OCC en février ?

AEn février, l'OCC a publié un projet de règles de 376 pages pour la mise en œuvre de la loi GENIUS.

QQuelles sont les autres agences fédérales impliquées dans la supervision des stablecoins selon la loi GENIUS ?

ASelon la loi GENIUS, les agences fédérales impliquées dans la supervision des produits de paiement en stablecoin comprennent, outre l'OCC, le Département du Trésor, la Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) et le Conseil des gouverneurs de la Réserve fédérale.

QQuel problème la non-publication des règles finales avant juillet a-t-elle créé pour les émetteurs de stablecoins ?

ALe fait que les règles finales n'aient pas été publiées avant juillet a créé une incertitude réglementaire pour les émetteurs de stablecoins.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

In the AI era, the most pressing political economy question is: as machines become increasingly capable, how can humanity share in the value they create? An article originally critiquing China's tech focus has sparked a deeper debate on this global challenge. Historically, industrial progress improved efficiency but still relied on human labor for wealth creation and distribution. AI is fundamentally different—it is now replacing cognitive and knowledge work. As AI and robots take over more tasks, economic growth may continue while direct human participation in value creation shrinks, creating a core tension between productivity gains and widespread income generation. The issue is not unique to China. While leading tech companies amass enormous wealth, labor's share of income is declining globally. The core problem is a broken link: technological innovation and corporate profits are not translating into sufficient consumer income and demand. Three potential paths forward are outlined: a traditional capitalist model where profits primarily go to capital owners; a state-capitalist approach with public investment in AI; and more innovative models like digital sovereign wealth funds, universal shareholding, or AI-era basic income schemes to directly distribute AI-generated value. The future competitive advantage may lie not just in technological supremacy, but in which society can build a new, inclusive distribution system for the intelligent economy. The ultimate challenge is ensuring that as AI creates value, humans have a means to obtain income and share in the resulting widespread social benefits.

marsbit10 хв тому

The Biggest Political Economy Question in the AI Era: As Robots Become More Capable, How Do Humans Share the Value?

marsbit10 хв тому

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

For the seventh consecutive quarter, dollar-funded emerging market carry trades have delivered positive returns, marking the longest winning streak since 2008. According to Bloomberg's index, this strategy has gained approximately 22% since late 2024, outperforming U.S. Treasuries, emerging market sovereign, and corporate dollar debt. The core of the trade involves borrowing low-interest currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or yen to invest in high-yielding emerging market assets, such as Turkish lira bonds offering over 40% returns. Returns were amplified by favorable currency moves, with the dollar weakening against most emerging market currencies and other traditional funding currencies. For instance, the trade gained 48% on the Colombian peso in the past year. A key test came in August 2024 with a historic joint U.S.-Japan currency intervention, which caused only a modest 1% dip in the carry trade risk premium as investors shifted funding from the yen to the euro and Swiss franc. Looking ahead, the primary risk is the timing of Federal Reserve policy changes. While persistent inflation allows the Fed to hold rates, a rapid rise in long-term U.S. yields could threaten the trade. Another concern is crowding, as massive inflows increase vulnerability to a sudden reversal. High interest rates in regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe, supported by external factors like Middle East tensions and energy prices, continue to sustain the opportunity. Major investors remain engaged, favoring currencies like the Mexican peso, South African rand, and Turkish lira.

marsbit25 хв тому

Generating Profits for Seven Consecutive Quarters, Emerging Markets Carry Trade Outperforms Everything

marsbit25 хв тому

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

Tsinghua and Wharton researchers have used GPT-5.6 Sol Pro to solve a 40-year-old open problem in optimization theory, proving a fundamental limit for gradient descent. They demonstrated that by adjusting only the step size sequence—without adding momentum or changing the algorithm's structure—the convergence rate of gradient descent cannot exceed Ω(T^{-1.9319}). This establishes a mathematical ceiling, showing that structural modifications are necessary to achieve the fastest possible convergence rates like O(1/T²). The core proof, involving a geometric construction based on "resisting oracles," was entirely generated through iterative interaction with the AI. The proof was then formally verified using the Lean 4 theorem prover, achieving zero "sorry" or "admit" statements, confirming its logical correctness without human intervention in the non-trivial mathematical steps. This result bridges the gap between the known O(T^{-1.2716}) rate achieved by the "silver stepsize" sequence and the newly proven impossibility bound. The work suggests a new paradigm where researchers can leverage general-purpose AI to explore and formally verify complex theoretical proofs.

marsbit34 хв тому

Tsinghua and Whiton Mentor-Disciple Team Cracks 40-Year-Old Mystery, Core Math All Written by GPT, Anyone Could Do It

marsbit34 хв тому

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

Anthropic publicly apologized after users discovered a hidden A/B test in Claude Code (versions 2.1.237+) that seemingly "dumbed down" the model. Developer argofowl found that selecting the "high" reasoning effort was being mapped internally to a value of "10," which previously corresponded to the "low" setting. While Anthropic engineers clarified this was only a change to the numerical mapping scale and assured it did not affect performance based on internal evaluations, the lack of communication about the test sparked widespread user backlash and self-tests on social media. Separately, significant complaints emerged about the flagship Opus 5 model, with users reporting it became "unstable," prone to lazy outputs, factual errors, and repetitive corrections. An Anthropic engineer acknowledged Opus 5's performance instability, calling its resolution a top priority. The incident highlights a growing industry-wide rift between improving benchmark scores and declining user-perceived quality and reliability. It underscores the lack of transparency in continuous model updates, where server-side changes, A/B tests, and configuration adjustments occur without clear user notification, eroding trust as AI models become critical infrastructure.

marsbit35 хв тому

Anthropic Admits Fault, Evidence of Secretly Downgrading Claude's Intelligence

marsbit35 хв тому

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

The article analyzes the concept of "real-world asset" (RWA) tokenization, arguing that while tokenizing assets on-chain is a useful step, it is far from transformative on its own. The author compares it to placing a barcode on a shipping container—it enables identification but does not build the necessary market infrastructure. The core argument is that true value emerges not from tokenization, but from integrating these tokens into DeFi systems where they can be valued, financed, hedged, traded, and liquidated under stress. Key challenges identified include: 1. **Multiple Time Clocks**: A fundamental tension exists between blockchain's 24/7 settlement and the slower, business-hour-dependent processes of traditional markets, custody, and redemption. This "duration mismatch" can create dangerous liquidity gaps during crises. 2. **Liquidity Misconceptions**: True liquidity is not measured by Total Value Locked (TVL) or trading pairs, but by the ability to exit a position within a required timeframe at an acceptable price. It requires analyzing multiple exit paths and stress-testing scenarios. 3. **Leverage and Risk**: Leverage unlocks economic utility (e.g., using tokenized assets as collateral) but also introduces fragility. Risk models must account for more than asset volatility, incorporating factors like legal enforceability, oracle freshness, and market structure. Paradoxically, a "safer" asset like tokenized Treasury bonds could require a higher collateral discount than ETH due to slower, less-proven liquidation mechanisms. 4. **A Risk Graph**: RWA risk should be modeled as a network of interconnected dependencies (e.g., issuers, custodians, oracles, stablecoin pools), not a single score. Failures can propagate through this graph, turning operational issues into systemic liquidity crises. The article states that tokenized government bonds are merely an entry point, while more complex frontiers like computing power and energy assets present greater challenges and opportunities. It also examines the interplay and risks between tokenized stocks and perpetual futures contracts. The conclusion is that the future lies not in "tokenizing everything," but in building robust market layers where tokenized rights become resilient financial primitives within a programmable capital system. The token is just the barcode; the market is the machine.

marsbit49 хв тому

Unpacking the Truth Behind On-chain Assets: Leverage, Liquidity, and Risk

marsbit49 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни GENIUS (GENIUS).