[Key interpretation] BTC sends the seller's market entry signal, and eth is very close to the pressure level

Huobi ResearchОпубліковано о 2022-08-10Востаннє оновлено о 2022-08-11

Анотація

BTC's long / short ratio retreated significantly, improving the growth trend of selling pressure.

1. BTC pullback prompt adjustment signal

After the price increase narrows in the rebound stage, BTC's Bollinger line index is obviously in a closed state. At this time, BTC's short-term rebounded to the brin line and retreated after encountering obstacles. The closing fall of the price on August 9 further indicated a reversal signal. BTC appears to be in the form of breaking its head and breaking its feet at the position in the figure. The price has nearly fallen below the corresponding US $22939 of the middle rail of the brin line, indicating that BTC is choosing to retreat downward. Judging from this, the risk of holding currency has been increased recently. Especially during the period of shrinking trading volume, the rebound rhythm of BTC did not slow down, and the pressure of price correction began to appear.

2. The divergence between the long and the short is increasing

The divergence between long and short contracts of BTC has increased. On August 9, the long and short strength began to incline to the short side, and the long and short ratio dropped to 0.894, the lowest value after December 3, 2021. That is to say, the BTC starts to prompt a downward pullback transaction signal. Of course, the decline of the long / short ratio is not completed in a short time. Since July 22, the long / short ratio has gradually dropped, and the value has gradually dropped from around 1.09 to the low point on August 9. During the fall of the long / short ratio, the BTC price began to stagnate, further verifying the downward risk.

3. BTC chain transfer is very active

The relatively active online transfer data shows that BTC is currently in a stage of high investor attention. Especially when the spot trading volume of the exchange remains stable, the synchronous performance of online transfer is better, which means that the potential trading heat of BTC is not low. Nevertheless, considering that the performance of the number of active addresses is not ideal, the number of active addresses per day remains around 900000, which is obviously lower than the average level before the middle of 2021. Therefore, in the near future, we can properly pay attention to the selling pressure changes of price pullback and pay attention to the opportunities of low price.

4. Eth long and short scramble to a critical stage

The ETH price fluctuates relatively frequently, and the point continues to be close to the corresponding USD 1910 of 61.8% of Fibonacci. At the same time, the intraday trading volume of eth continues to shrink, and the RSI index continues to indicate a deviation from the falling signal, so it is imperative to change the price. On the news side, the merger date of eth is approaching, and the breakthrough direction change after the price fluctuation will be paid attention to after the positive cashing. On the trend, after the ETH rebound space improved, the confirmation of the support of USD 1000 continued to strengthen. There are many adjustment factors that need to be considered in the near future, and the selling of the price below $2000 needs attention.

5. Stable coin sending address activity rebound

Recently, the number of sending addresses of eth rebounded in the short term, and the fluctuation trend was consistent with the performance of eth. In the same period, the number of receiving addresses of stable coins showed a steady decline, which means that the concentration of stable coins is increasing while the supply of stable coins is generally unchanged. Most stable coin holders send a large number of stable coins, which means that the concentration of stable coins rebounds in the short term.

This shows that the main force of holding coins, or the number of giant whales holding coins, has increased, which has a deeper impact on the market.

Пов'язані матеріали

A Guide to Grayscale’s ‘Bottom Fishing’: Using Cash Flow to Assess Cryptocurrency Value

**Title:** Grayscale's Guide to Bottom-Fishing: Valuing Cryptoassets Using Cash Flows **Summary:** This report by Grayscale Research presents a fundamental valuation framework for cryptocurrency assets, moving beyond pure speculation to analyze those with underlying cash flows. It distinguishes between "commodity-like" assets (e.g., Bitcoin) and "cash-flow" assets, primarily within DeFi. Using the leading decentralized lending protocol Aave as a case study, the analysis applies traditional financial methodologies like Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) multiples. Key findings indicate that AAVE tokens are currently undervalued. Despite recent challenges, the protocol's strong revenue growth, ~50% net profit margin, and diversified treasury support a fundamental valuation range of $80-$100 per token (compared to a ~$75 market price at the time of writing). In a base-case scenario driven by stablecoin adoption and regulatory clarity, the fair value could rise to around $175 within a year. The report emphasizes that protocol success does not automatically translate to token value. It critically examines the "value capture" mechanisms—such as buybacks, burns, and staking rewards—that channel protocol profits to token holders. Furthermore, it addresses the legal and governance complexities of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), noting their difference from traditional corporate equity but highlighting how robust, transparent governance can align protocol economics with holder interests. The conclusion is that the crypto market is maturing, with capital increasingly flowing towards projects with demonstrable fundamentals, real adoption, and disciplined capital allocation, creating opportunities for value-based investors.

marsbit20 хв тому

A Guide to Grayscale’s ‘Bottom Fishing’: Using Cash Flow to Assess Cryptocurrency Value

marsbit20 хв тому

After semiconductors lead the gains, are funds buying into AI orders or a macroeconomic rebound?

After US-Iran talks led to a temporary ceasefire and framework for reopening the strategic Strait of Hormuz, U.S. stocks rose on June 18, with the Nasdaq gaining 1.9%. The semiconductor and AI hardware sectors outperformed. This rally stemmed primarily from reduced geopolitical risk, which lowered oil prices and inflation expectations, easing discount rate pressure on high-valuation growth stocks like tech. The key question is not whether tech rebounded, but the nature of the rebound. The market appears to be selectively repricing AI infrastructure plays rather than broadly chasing AI narratives. Gains were concentrated in chips, optical interconnects, memory, and domestic manufacturing—segments tied to tangible data center build-outs and capital expenditure. Intel's ~10% surge, fueled by a Trump statement about potential Apple collaboration, exemplifies this mixed dynamic. It reflects policy catalysts and domestic manufacturing sentiment more than confirmed fundamentals. Meanwhile, strong earnings from companies like Astera Labs (revenue up 93% YoY) provided concrete evidence of AI-driven demand in hardware. In essence, the rally represents a risk-premium recalibration. Lower Middle East tensions opened a valuation repair window, and capital flowed first into AI infrastructure segments with visible near-term revenue streams. The sustainability of this move hinges on upcoming Q2 earnings, specifically continued strength in cloud provider capex, AI server orders, and hardware company guidance. Policy hopes alone are insufficient; the cycle needs validation from orders and financials.

marsbit25 хв тому

After semiconductors lead the gains, are funds buying into AI orders or a macroeconomic rebound?

marsbit25 хв тому

The Entire Internet Hails Noam's Joining, But OpenAI's Loss Bill Just Got Thicker

While the AI community celebrates Noam Shazeer, co-author of the "Attention Is All You Need" paper, joining OpenAI as Head of Architectural Research, the company's audited financials reveal a starkly different reality. In 2025, OpenAI reported $13.07 billion in revenue but a massive $20.92 billion operating loss. Even excluding a one-time accounting charge, the cash burn is severe, with $3.7 billion consumed in Q1 2026 alone. This high-profile hiring occurs against a backdrop of significant internal research talent drain, with key founders and researchers departing as the company's focus shifts from exploratory research to product iteration. Meanwhile, OpenAI's fundamental business model faces a deep crisis. It paid Microsoft $10.59 billion for compute in 2025, while its vast user base of 9 billion weekly actives includes only 50 million paying customers, making growth a direct driver of escalating costs. The article argues Shazeer's recruitment is less about technical necessity and more about crafting a compelling narrative for OpenAI's upcoming IPO, aiming to justify a rumored $1 trillion valuation to future public market investors. It contrasts OpenAI's strategy with Anthropic's reported path to profitability, which relies on a strong enterprise customer base and cost control, rather than star-powered narratives. Ultimately, the piece concludes that while Shazeer's architectural work may take 1-2 years to materialize, OpenAI's financial clock is ticking much faster, with its massive losses undercutting the celebratory headlines.

marsbit2 год тому

The Entire Internet Hails Noam's Joining, But OpenAI's Loss Bill Just Got Thicker

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片