ICP 暴涨 22%，随后下跌 8% – 剧烈波动后，走势将如何发展？

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-22Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-22

Анотація

DFinity基金会副总裁表示，AI驱动的无代码应用开发平台将增强Web3基础设施的安全性与抗干扰能力，可能避免类似此前AWS宕机对加密行业造成的冲击。近期ICP价格从低点反弹22.6%，但随后出现8.46%的回调，完全回吐11月涨幅。技术分析显示，三日图仍呈看跌结构，需突破3.78美元才能扭转趋势。尽管短期指标偏多，但大周期看跌格局未改，且比特币市场情绪疲软可能加剧山寨币抛压。建议短线交易者可在2.9美元支撑位上方谨慎做多，但摆动交易者仍需保持看空直至关键阻力位突破。

Dfinity 基金会的副总裁 Lomesh Dutta 表示，人工智能驱动的无代码工具在应用程序生成和演进方面的兴起，将能够提供安全、稳定、防篡改的基础设施。

这可能有助于防止许多加密货币公司和 Web3 应用在 10 月份 AWS 中断后所面临的那种服务中断。

Dfinity 基金会是一个非营利组织，指导着 Internet Computer [ICP] 区块链的开发。

这些言论可能让 ICP 重新回到公众视野，有助于解释最近的上涨。ICP 从周五的低点上涨了 22.6%，但在最近几个小时的交易中出现了小幅回调。

获利了结活动抹去了 ICP 十一月的涨幅

3 日图显示了一个看跌的内部结构，并且完全回吐了从 2.79 美元到 9.85 美元的十一月涨幅。市场预期 5 美元和 4.3 美元的支撑位会得到捍卫，但这些预期被证明是错误的。

DMI（动向指标）并未显示出强烈的趋势正在进行，但其混乱的信号确实捕捉到了近期冲动性上涨的速度以及随后的回撤。OBV（能量潮指标）在缓慢走低，MACD（平滑异同移动平均线）也显示出看跌动能。

要扭转结构转为看涨，ICP 必须重新站上 3.78 美元。

4 小时图显示了在 3.2 美元区域存在一个不平衡（以白色高亮显示）。这个不平衡是在该时间框架上出现看涨结构突破后形成的。截至发稿时，ICP 正面临小幅下跌，在不到 12 小时内下跌了 8.46%。

技术指标对多头有利，但交易者必须记住，更高时间框架的结构仍然是看跌的。在价格突破 3.78 美元之前，交易者在建立多头头寸时需要谨慎。

评估 ICP 的下一步走势

市场整体情绪，尤其是比特币 [BTC] 的情绪，仍然 mostly（主要）是看跌的。在这种情绪转为看涨之前，那些大幅上涨的山寨币很可能仍会遭遇获利了结活动带来的沉重抛售压力。

较低时间框架的交易者现在可以考虑买入 ICP，止损设在 2.9 美元的局部支撑位下方。

交易者行动呼吁 – 保持看跌

在 3 日图收盘价突破 3.78 美元水平之前，波段交易者可以保持看跌观点。1 日图也强调了相同的局部阻力位是一个关键的波段点。

最后总结

近期引起公众关注的人工智能驱动的无代码工具的兴起，可能帮助 Internet Computer 实现了其近期的部分涨幅。
过去一个月的价格走势仍然对空头有利，在结构转为看涨之前，交易者应警惕做多。

免责声明：本文所提供的信息不构成金融、投资、交易或其他任何形式的建议，仅代表作者个人观点。

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

Пов'язані питання

QDfinity Foundation副总裁Lomesh Dutta认为AI驱动的无代码工具对Web3应用有什么好处？

ALomesh Dutta表示，AI驱动的无代码工具能够为应用的生成和演进提供安全、稳定、防篡改的基础设施，有助于防止类似10月份AWS宕机后许多加密公司和Web3应用面临的故障问题。

QICP在近期交易中经历了怎样的价格波动？

AICP从周五低点上涨了22.6%，但在最近几个小时的交易中出现了小幅回调，在不到12小时内下跌了8.46%。

Q技术分析显示ICP需要突破哪个关键价位才能转为看涨结构？

A技术分析显示，ICP需要突破3.78美元的关键阻力位，才能将结构转为看涨。

Q为什么文章建议交易者在当前市场环境下保持看跌立场？

A因为更高时间框架的结构仍然看跌，且整个市场情绪（尤其是比特币）主要呈看跌态势，除非市场情绪转为看涨，否则获得强劲收益的替代币很可能面临获利了结带来的沉重卖压。

Q对于较低时间框架的交易者，文章建议的ICP交易策略是什么？

A文章建议较低时间框架的交易者可以在当前价位买入ICP，并将止损设在2.9美元的局部支撑位下方。

Пов'язані матеріали

My Grievance Against Memory Manufacturers: Samsung and Others Are Strangling the AI Capital Expenditure Cycle

Title: My Resentment Towards Memory Manufacturers: Samsung and Others Are Strangling the AI Capital Expenditure Cycle. Summary: The author argues that the DRAM oligopoly (Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron) is aggressively raising prices, jeopardizing the ongoing AI investment boom. DRAM contract prices are up nearly 700% year-over-year, with memory projected to consume 40% of hyperscaler capex by 2027. While manufacturers enjoy margins of 60-80%, the soaring cost forces cloud giants like Microsoft to significantly increase budgets. The author contends this is unsustainable, as cloud providers' free cash flow is being consumed by capex. He predicts a turning point in mid-2027, earlier than the consensus view of 2030, when capex growth will stall as cost pressures bite, leading to a peak and subsequent decline in DRAM pricing and manufacturer margins. This challenges the "end of the memory cycle" narrative, asserting that high prices will inevitably curb demand and trigger a downturn.

marsbit30 хв тому

My Grievance Against Memory Manufacturers: Samsung and Others Are Strangling the AI Capital Expenditure Cycle

marsbit30 хв тому

Mining Scale Skyrockets: Why Can't Bitdeer Hold onto Its Bitcoin?

Bitdeer's May 2026 operational data reveals a stark contrast: while its Bitcoin mining output surged to 921 BTC, a 370% year-over-year increase, its end-of-month holdings plummeted to just 171 BTC. This significant disparity highlights that the company, amidst a strategic pivot towards AI cloud infrastructure, continues to rely heavily on selling newly mined Bitcoin to fund operations and expansion, despite reporting a steady $69 million in annualized recurring AI revenue. The trend is consistent with Q1 2026 figures, where mining output reached 2,033 BTC but holdings were a mere 31 BTC, with $206.8 million from digital asset disposals. While the AI business, showing 90% GPU utilization, offers a potential future cash flow buffer to reduce dependency on Bitcoin sales, its current contribution to actual confirmed revenue remains limited. The transformation introduces new risks related to client acquisition, capital-intensive data center projects like Tydal, and delivery timelines. The core question raised is whether the AI venture will successfully generate sufficient stable cash flow to allow Bitdeer to retain more of its mining proceeds as Bitcoin treasury assets, or if the shift merely changes the form of financial pressure while Bitcoin reserves continue to dwindle.

Foresight News38 хв тому

Mining Scale Skyrockets: Why Can't Bitdeer Hold onto Its Bitcoin?

Foresight News38 хв тому

Beyond the Model Lies the Harness: Deepseek Enters the Arena, Why Has the Main Battlefield of China's AI Competition Shifted?

In mid-to-late May 2026, Deepseek internally established a new Harness team focused on code agent products, internally benchmarked against Anthropic's Claude Code. This move, marked by the formula "Model + Harness = Agent" in their job postings, signals a major shift in China's AI competition: the main battlefield is transitioning from developing large models to building toolchains and achieving workplace integration. Deepseek's direct involvement in Harness development aims to secure control over interface design and training data feedback loops, moving beyond open-sourcing powerful models. Harness, the runtime infrastructure for AI agents, handles everything beyond model reasoning—task orchestration, tool calling, context management, safety checks, and error recovery. It is crucial because agent products are not just outputs of model capability but also training grounds for it. Real-world task failures recorded by Harness can feed back into model training, creating a flywheel effect. Engineering Harness is more critical than optimizing prompts, as poor context management or error handling can drastically reduce agent success rates in multi-step, real-world scenarios. This shift is not isolated. Other major Chinese tech companies are also pursuing differentiated toolchain strategies. Tencent leverages its enterprise ecosystem (WeChat Work, Tencent Cloud) to build connectors for organizational-level AI collaboration and complex task delivery. Alibaba focuses on lowering automation barriers on the web with a front-end, browser-based GUI Agent framework, PageAgent. This diversification shows the industry recognizes that success lies not in a perfect general agent, but in vertically focused solutions built with robust engineering. The trend is validated by overseas success, such as Poland's Viktor, an AI coworker on Slack achieving $20M ARR by autonomously executing complex, multi-step tasks. This proves a shift in enterprise willingness to pay—from "AI-assisted generation" to "AI-autonomous execution." As Harness matures to provide safety guards and reliability, AI transitions from a human-supervised intern to an independent outsourcer. The competition now faces key engineering challenges: preventing "token explosion" through intelligent context compression, and building "thick frameworks" with features like sandbox isolation and checkpoint recovery for enterprise-grade stability. Geopolitical restrictions on tools like Claude Code further create a significant market vacuum for domestic solutions like Deepseek's Harness. For enterprises and developers, the focus must shift from comparing model benchmarks to evaluating a vendor's engineering capabilities, error recovery mechanisms, context management, and ecosystem compatibility when choosing AI products and platforms.

marsbit40 хв тому

Beyond the Model Lies the Harness: Deepseek Enters the Arena, Why Has the Main Battlefield of China's AI Competition Shifted?

marsbit40 хв тому

Stock Price Plummets 32% in a Month! Has MicroStrategy's 'Leveraged Bitcoin Buying' Model Reached Its End?

MicroStrategy's stock has declined 32% over the past month, with its flagship Series A Preferred Stock (STRC) falling below its $100 par value. Analysts attribute the weakness not to Bitcoin's price, but to market concerns over how the company will manage its growing fixed obligations and fund shareholder distributions. MicroStrategy recently sold a small portion of its Bitcoin holdings to meet these payments, marking a shift from its core narrative of continuous capital raises to accumulate Bitcoin. While the company asserts its substantial BTC reserves provide decades of liability coverage, the move has introduced complexity and questions about future financing efficiency. Analysts see this as a period of growing pains rather than an existential threat, noting that investor demand for higher returns reflects increased risk perception.

marsbit50 хв тому

Stock Price Plummets 32% in a Month! Has MicroStrategy's 'Leveraged Bitcoin Buying' Model Reached Its End?

marsbit50 хв тому

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks

Korean storage export data for the first 20 days of June shows substantial year-on-year increases in both value and price-per-kilogram for categories like DRAM, NAND, and SSDs. This signals a potential shift beyond simple demand recovery, indicating rising prices and a product mix shift towards higher-value items, possibly influenced by AI infrastructure needs. A key point is that the surge in price-per-kilogram is not simply a uniform chip price hike. It reflects a combination of actual price increases and, more importantly, an export structure increasingly dominated by high-value-density products like HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) and advanced DRAM, which are critical for AI servers. This suggests AI-driven demand may be spilling over from just HBM into broader memory markets. SK Hynix stands to benefit directly due to its leading HBM position. For Samsung and Micron, the implication is potential for greater margin elasticity if the tightness in high-end memory spreads to enterprise SSD and NAND prices. However, the storage sector remains cyclical. Risks include supply expansion, inventory changes, and potential slowdowns in broader AI capital expenditure. Ultimately, while the strong export data supports upward revisions for storage company earnings and fuels discussion of an "AI infrastructure bottleneck premium," a definitive valuation shift from a cyclical to a structural story depends on upcoming quarterly reports. Investors need confirmation from SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron that improvements in average selling prices, product mix, and, crucially,毛利率 are sustained over multiple quarters.

marsbit2 год тому

Soaring Export Data for Memory Chips, Market Is Redefining the Valuation Anchor for Memory Stocks