Merlin Chain 暴涨——在7500万美元未平仓合约峰值后,MERL会回调吗?

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-13Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-13

Анотація

梅林链(MERL)作为比特币二层解决方案,近期链上活动显著增加,尽管比特币价格波动有限。MERL价格上涨16%,持币地址数增至17.38万,永续合约未平仓头寸(OI)达到7579万美元的历史新高,单日增长约2700万美元,市场流动性大幅提升。多头情绪主导,交易量比率显示买盘占优。 现货市场持续积累MERL,交易所流出量虽不大(单日约70万美元),但配合资金净流出表明投资者看好当前入场机会。累积/分配指标虽仍为负值,但已回升,显示买压增强,尚未完全抵消上周的卖压。 尽管行情看涨,清算热图提示下行风险:当前价格下方存在未填充流动性区域,可能引发短期回调。但若看涨动量持续,价格或突破常规流动性回撤趋势。

Merlin Chain [MERL] 作为比特币 [BTC] 的第二层解决方案,尽管比特币价格基本保持区间波动,但在过去一天内其链上活动显著增加。

截至发稿时,该资产价格大幅上涨16%,同时代币持有者数量攀升至173,800人。尽管表现明显看涨,但在更广泛的市场结构中,潜在价格回调的迹象仍然隐约可见。

流动性激增推高价格

MERL价格的近期飙升主要归因于衍生品市场的流动性急剧流入。

截至撰写本文时,MERL永续合约未平仓合约(OI)——一个反映未平仓衍生品合约总价值和整体市场流动性的指标——已攀升至7579万美元的历史新高。

值得注意的是,这一飙升突显了当前市场弥漫的看涨情绪。OI在一天内扩大了约2700万美元后达到这一水平。

如此大规模的单日流入通常包括多头和空头交易者的头寸。在这种情况下,交易数据表明多头头寸主导了市场活动。

交易量也明显转为正值,Taker买卖比率达到1.05。该读数表明Taker买单主导了累计交易量,增强了短期看涨压力。

现货投资者入场

现货市场参与者也在继续积累MERL,这有助于限制可用供应。

具体来看,交易所流出量相对温和,过去一天从中心化平台撤出了约70万美元的MERL。

单就这一水平而言,这种流出量并不能有力确认看涨的市场结构,因为其金额仍然相对较小。

然而,持续的积累加上稳定的净流出增加了MERL维持上升轨迹的可能性,因为看涨的投资者将当前水平视为有吸引力的入场点。

值得注意的是,积累/分布指标已小幅上升,表明相对于卖出压力,买入压力更强。尽管如此,该指标仍处于负值区域。

这一负值读数表明,近期的买入尚未完全抵消过去一周观察到的更沉重的卖出压力,而该压力导致了先前的下跌。

回调风险?

尽管近期有所上涨,但MERL仍显示出下行风险,正如清算热力图所指示的那样。

该工具突出显示当前价格上方和下方的流动性集中区域,以预示潜在的价格变动。上方的流动性通常会吸引价格上涨,而下方的集群则表明随着市场填补这些水平,价格可能出现下跌。

目前,MERL的上涨已将价格推高,清除了上方的重大流动性区域。因此,大多数流动性集群现在位于当前交易区间下方。

基于经典的市场行为,这种设置增加了短期回调的可能性。然而,这种结果并非必然发生。

一个关键的例外情况是,当看涨势头持续增强时,价格可能会违背典型的流动性驱动的回撤。


最终思考

  • MERL从衍生品市场录得大量流动性流入,同时现货投资者继续积累。
  • 清算热力图显示价格波动可能性很大,未填补的流动性集群位于当前水平下方。

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QMerlin Chain (MERL) 的价格在过去一天内上涨了多少?

AMerlin Chain (MERL) 的价格在过去一天内上涨了16%。

Q推动 MERL 近期上涨的主要因素是什么?

A推动 MERL 近期上涨的主要因素是衍生品市场的大量流动性流入,其永续合约未平仓合约(OI)达到了7579万美元的历史新高。

Q根据文章,MERL 的清算热力图显示了什么风险?

A清算热力图显示,当前价格下方存在未填充的流动性集群,这增加了价格出现短期回调的可能性。

Q目前 MERL 的持币地址数量达到了多少?

A目前 MERL 的持币地址数量已攀升至173,800个。

Q文章中提到,什么指标表明买入订单在主导市场活动?

ATaker Buy/Sell Ratio(吃单买入/卖出比率)达到了1.05,这表明吃单买入订单正在主导累计交易量,加强了短期的看涨压力。

Пов'язані матеріали

Playing the "Decoupling" Card Again? Domestic Optical Modules Face a Stress Test

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is reportedly drafting a ban on importing new models of Chinese-made optical transceiver modules, with a potential implementation target of 2026. This "decoupling" move comes as Chinese firms, led by industry leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink, dominate the global optical module market with over 60% share, and hold an even larger position in the high-speed 800G and 1.6T segments critical for AI data centers. Market reactions were mixed: U.S. optical module stocks initially rose, while Chinese A-shares opened lower but largely recovered by the close. Analysis suggests a complete U.S. decoupling from Chinese modules faces significant hurdles. North American cloud giants (Meta, Google, Microsoft, Amazon) and NVIDIA have massive demand for high-speed modules, estimated at around 40 million units in 2026. U.S. manufacturers' combined monthly production capacity for these modules is less than one-fifth that of a single major Chinese player like Zhongji Innolight, which reported production of 23.76 million units in 2025. Chinese companies are heavily reliant on the U.S. market, with over 90% of revenue for top firms coming from overseas, primarily the U.S. However, they have begun mitigating risks by establishing assembly plants in Southeast Asia and Mexico. Industry observers note the final impact depends on whether any potential U.S. restrictions target specific companies or products based on origin. Past U.S. sanctions on Chinese tech firms have often spurred increased domestic R&D and market diversification. Despite initial stock volatility, shares of major Chinese optical module companies pared losses, indicating market belief in the sector's resilience and the practical difficulties of abruptly replacing Chinese supply.

marsbit10 хв тому

Playing the "Decoupling" Card Again? Domestic Optical Modules Face a Stress Test

marsbit10 хв тому

When the Competition in Chip Manufacturing Equipment Stops Being Just About Who Is More Advanced

The competition in chip manufacturing equipment is no longer solely about who has the most advanced technology. While performance, yield, and cost remain key, U.S. export controls are adding a critical new dimension: long-term supply chain reliability. Major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix, despite having mature supply chains with leading American and European vendors, are reportedly evaluating etching equipment from China's AMEC for their Chinese factories. This move is not primarily about immediate replacement or AMEC's current capabilities. Instead, it's a risk mitigation strategy. Companies are concerned that future U.S. policies could disrupt their access to spare parts, software updates, and maintenance for existing equipment over its decade-long lifespan. For chipmakers investing billions in fabs with long planning cycles, this policy-induced uncertainty is a significant new risk. The U.S., through its controls, is inadvertently eroding the very reliability and certainty that were foundational strengths of its equipment suppliers. This creates a pivotal shift for Chinese semiconductor equipment. Previously seen largely as a "domestic replacement" option when foreign gear was unavailable, they are now being assessed as potential "contingency suppliers" by global players—even before a supply disruption occurs. This provides a crucial entry point for validation in real production lines, which is essential for iterative improvement. Chinese equipment, particularly in areas like etching, has progressed from prototypes to participating in mass production within China, gaining valuable experience. However, this does not signify full global competitiveness. Gaps remain in advanced lithography, metrology, and other key tools. The current evaluations are largely confined to foreign firms' China-based fabs, not their global procurement networks. The core change is in the decision-making framework. Efficiency-driven globalization favored single, optimal suppliers. An era of heightened geopolitical risk is forcing companies to value "replaceability." While technical prowess remains paramount, supply chain certainty is now being factored into a device's competitive equation. Ultimately, U.S. policies have not made Chinese equipment more advanced, but they have given global customers a compelling reason to start testing it. The competition has expanded: it's no longer just about who is more advanced, but also about who can be relied upon to stay.

marsbit11 хв тому

When the Competition in Chip Manufacturing Equipment Stops Being Just About Who Is More Advanced

marsbit11 хв тому

Trading Volume Increased by 2.5x, Why Did Circle's Revenue Only Grow by 7%?

Circle's Q2 performance presents a seemingly contradictory picture: the transaction volume of its stablecoin USDC surged 151% year-over-year to $14.8 trillion, while its "Total Revenue & Reserve Revenue" grew by only 7% to $701 million. This discrepancy highlights the core of Circle's business model. Revenue is primarily driven not by transaction volume, but by the average amount of USDC in circulation and the yield generated from its reserves. Key points: 1. **Revenue Drivers:** Over 90% of revenue comes from "reserve income," which is a function of average USDC circulation (up 25% YoY) and the reserve yield (which fell by 66 basis points). The net effect was a mere ~5% increase in reserve income. 2. **Transaction vs. Revenue:** High transaction volume indicates robust usage of USDC for payments and settlements, but does not translate directly to revenue. It must first convert into a sustained, average circulating balance. 3. **Cost Structure:** After accounting for distribution and other costs, the metric "Revenue Less Direct Costs" (RLDC) grew faster than total revenue, with its margin improving. However, rising operating expenses (up 23% YoY) meant that Adjusted EBITDA growth was limited to 8%. 4. **New Initiatives:** Circle reported progress on new networks like the Circle Payments Network and upcoming products (Arc, Agent Stack), but these are currently measured by adoption metrics (e.g., transaction run-rate, number of services) rather than material revenue contribution this quarter. In summary, the financial results are determined by the interplay of USDC circulation, reserve yields, and cost structures, while high transaction volume signals underlying network strength that has not yet fully flowed through to the income statement.

marsbit28 хв тому

Trading Volume Increased by 2.5x, Why Did Circle's Revenue Only Grow by 7%?

marsbit28 хв тому

Samsung China, Another Step Back

Samsung China Takes Another Step Back Samsung Electronics is further retreating from the Chinese consumer market. Following the exit of its home appliance business in May, its mobile phone division is now reportedly scaling down. Stores with monthly sales below 300,000 RMB are being closed in several cities. Data shows Samsung's smartphone market share in China has plummeted to 0.1% in Q2 2026, a stark contrast to its 22% global leadership. The decline is attributed to intense competition from domestic brands offering better value, higher specs (like faster charging), and superior localization in software and services. Samsung's premium pricing and less adapted One UI system have struggled against rivals like Huawei, Xiaomi, and Honor. This consumer electronics retreat coincides with Samsung's record-breaking semiconductor profits, driven by the AI boom. In Q2 2026, the chip division contributed nearly all operating profit, while the mobile and home appliance unit posted its first-ever operating loss. Internal dynamics, like the chip division charging market prices to the mobile unit, have increased cost pressures. Samsung's strategy now appears to be a focused retreat towards the ultra-premium segment in China, similar to its global push in high-end foldables like the Galaxy Z Fold8. The company is likely to retain only key stores in major cities to serve a niche, high-end clientele. While its deep semiconductor reserves offer a cushion, this shift away from mass-market consumer electronics reduces business diversification. The move is pragmatic but signifies a fundamental transformation; Samsung is ceding mass-market influence and betting heavily on its semiconductor strength and a narrowed premium product focus.

marsbit32 хв тому

Samsung China, Another Step Back

marsbit32 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Популярні статті

Як купити MERL

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Merlin chain (MERL) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Merlin chain (MERL).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Merlin chain (MERL)Після придбання Merlin chain (MERL) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Merlin chain (MERL)Легко торгуйте Merlin chain (MERL) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

388 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.12Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити MERL

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни MERL (MERL).

活动图片