Voyager Digital Under FDIC Scrutiny As It Files For Bankruptcy

cryptodailyОпубліковано о 2022-07-08Востаннє оновлено о 2022-07-08

Анотація

Voyager Digital could come under added scrutiny after its marketing came on the radar of the FDIC

Voyager Digital could come under added scrutiny after its marketing came on the radar of the FDIC, reportedly because come customers of the platform did not understand the scope of FDIC protection for their deposits, leading to questions around the marketing of the firm. 
Depositors In For A Surprise 
Voyager Digital account holders were in for a bit of a surprise as the crypto brokerage and lender filed for bankruptcy on Tuesday. Depositors were stunned to discover that their deposits did not have the same protection they thought they did. These developments could signal additional consequences for an embattled company. 
Voyager Digital had filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11, stating that it had debts of up to $10 billion that it owed to around 100,000 creditors. The crisis was exasperated by the collapse of the Singaporean hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC), which had defaulted on a loan of 15,250 BTC and 350 million USD Coin (USDC) just a week prior. 
Marketing Under The Scanner 
Voyager Digital’s website stated that the customer’s USD is held by the company’s banking partner, the Metropolitan Commercial Bank, which is ensured by the FDIC. It further assured customers that because of this, the cash they hold with Voyager is protected. The Metropolitan Commercial Bank holds around $350 million in deposits from the customers of Voyager Digital. 
However, the bank issued a statement explaining that the FDIC does not provide protection against Voyager Digital’s failure or against the loss of cryptocurrency deposits. The FDIC (United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) insures accounts for up to $250,000 per depositor in case of failure of the bank, the bank explained in a statement. Frances Schadenfreude Cassandra shared the bank’s statement on Twitter, tweeting out, 
“Statement from Metropolitan Commercial Bank about #FDIC insurance for #Voyager customers. Bad news, I’m afraid.”
The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing unnamed sources, that Voyager Digital depositors expected to receive all the cash from their accounts held in the Metropolitan Commercial Bank, as they were promised by Voyager Digital, prompting the FDIC to look into the claims. 
A Proposed Reorganization 
Voyager Digital, on its part, claimed in its proposed reorganization foresaw that, subject to specific contingencies, customers who hold crypto in their accounts will receive a combination of crypto, shares, and proceeds from the 3AC recovery. 
“Customers with crypto in their account(s) will receive in exchange a combination of the crypto in their account(s), proceeds from the 3AC recovery, common shares in the newly reorganized Company, and Voyager tokens.”
Ties With Sam Bankman-Fried And Alameda Research 
It also came to light that Voyager Digital had a complex financial relationship with Alameda Research, a project backed by Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX. Alameda Research is Voyager Digital’s largest shareholder while also being the organization’s largest creditor at $377 million. It also owes Voyager Digital $75 million. 
“Two most interesting things in the Voyager bankruptcy petition: (1) Voyager’s second-largest exposure is to Alameda Research. So there’s some recycled capital. Voyager loans Alameda $377M, & Alameda reloans Voyager $75M. Plus, Alameda is Voyager’s largest shareholder (9.5%).”

Пов'язані матеріали

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit32 хв тому

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit32 хв тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit7 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit7 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手7 год тому

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手7 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片