Revolut Rolls Out Direct USD-to-Stablecoin Feature

TheCryptoTimesОпубліковано о 2025-10-31Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-31

Revolut, a Global Fintech company, has introduced a new feature allowing users to swap U.S. dollars for stablecoins at a one-to-one rate, without any fees, spreads, or hidden costs.

In a LinkedIn post announcing the update, Leonid Bashlykov, Revolut’s Head of Crypto Product, said, “Today marks the day we remove all anxiety and friction of moving between fiat and crypto.” He described the feature, called “1:1 Stablecoins by Revolut,” as a way to make $1 in fiat equal to $1 in digital form.

The change allows Revolut’s 65 million users to convert up to $578,000 in USD and stablecoins every 30 days without losing value.

The service supports two of the largest stablecoins, Circle’s USDC and Tether’s USDT, across six blockchains, including Ethereum, Solana, and Tron. Revolut will cover any conversion spread internally to maintain the 1:1 rate, as long as the stablecoins remain pegged to the dollar.

The company said the update aims to make moving money between bank accounts and blockchain networks easier. The announcement follows Revolut’s receipt of a Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) license from regulators in Cyprus, allowing it to offer crypto services across 30 European countries.

Potential benefits for SMBs

Industry observers say the update could have benefits beyond everyday users. In a comment, venture capitalist Elbruz Yılmaz, a fintech investor at Outrun, said Revolut’s 1:1 USD-to-stablecoin swap could help small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) in countries like Turkey.

He noted that SMBs there often lose between 0.8% and 1.5% of their funds when converting from local currency to U.S. dollars, along with extra costs from SWIFT fees and exchange rate slippage. By removing those losses, he said, a direct one-to-one conversion could help SMBs manage cash flow more efficiently and reduce foreign exchange costs.

Fintechs turn to blockchain

Revolut’s update comes as more financial firms explore blockchain-based payment systems. Last week, Western Union announced a plan to launch its own stablecoin, the U.S. Dollar Payment Token (USDPT), on the Solana blockchain by 2026. Issued by Anchorage Digital Bank, the token will let users send, receive, and hold digital dollars, with the rollout expected in the first half of 2026. 

Similarly, Zelle and MoneyGram recently introduced stablecoin initiatives aimed at faster and cheaper cross-border transfers. SWIFT, the global interbank messaging network, has also begun testing an on-chain messaging system on Consensys’ Layer 2 blockchain, Linea.

The bigger picture

Revolut’s move comes as stablecoins are becoming part of the wider financial system, not just a crypto niche. Its new feature, backed by a MiCA license in Europe, shows how regulated fintechs are beginning to connect traditional money with blockchain networks in practical ways.

Around the world, more companies and governments are moving in the same direction. Visa is widening its stablecoin settlement network, while Circle and ClearBank are working to improve euro liquidity. Japan and Korea have launched their own national digital currencies, while Canada, Australia, and France are working on rules to manage and oversee stablecoin use.

These developments show a gradual move toward treating stablecoins as part of everyday financial infrastructure, aimed at improving efficiency and transparency in payments.

Also Read: BDACS Brings Korea’s KRW1 Stablecoin to Circle’s Arc


Mobile Only Image

Пов'язані матеріали

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手1 год тому

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手1 год тому

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手1 год тому

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手1 год тому

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit1 год тому

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片