Uniswap v4 加速启航:Brevis 助推下一轮 DeFi 采用浪潮

marsbitОпубліковано о 2025-10-23Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-24

Uniswap v4:开启 AMM 创新的下一波浪潮

Uniswap v4(以下简称v4) 于 2025 年 1 月引入了 Hook 和 Singleton 架构,解锁了动态费用、自定义曲线逻辑、MEV 抗性等高级资金池功能。

对交易者而言,随着流动性根据市场状况进行智能调整,这意味着更优的执行价格、更低的滑点与交易成本。对开发者而言,v4 提供了一个灵活的框架,使其能够持续创新,而无需担心流动性分散。

聚合器:v4 集成带来的新挑战

与此同时,v4 也为 1inch、0x、Velora 等 DEX 聚合器带来了新挑战。聚合器是许多交易者的入口,它们集成不同 DEX,将交易路由至多个资金池,以寻求最佳执行路径和费用层级。

对于 Uniswap v2 和 v3,集成过程相对直接。v2 时代,聚合器仅需应用恒定乘积公式进行报价。v3 因集中流动性与多费用层级而变得复杂,但仍保持了通用的资金池结构,使得集成具备可扩展性。

然而在 v4 中,各个资金池不再是同质化的。每个池都可凭借 Hook 进行定制,从而改变其交换逻辑、费用结构或执行保证。这种灵活性丰富了生态系统,但也迫使聚合器必须识别并理解其所集成每个资金池的独特行为。

推动 v4 加速采用

为加速 v4 的采用并提高聚合器集成的回报,Uniswap 基金会授予 Brevis 此项资助,旨在利用其 ZK 数据协处理器和 zkVM,为所有将订单流路由至 v4 Hook 池的路由器提供无需信任的 Gas 费 rebate。

这些rebates为路由器提供了新的经济支持,鼓励其尝试 v4 Hook。无论路由器是将rebate用于抵消自身运营成本、降低交易者费用,还是用于建立可持续的财库,最终结果都是一致的:更快的集成速度、更深的流动性、更优的交易执行效果以及用户交易费用的降低。

由 Brevis 赋能的无信任 Gas Rebate

该rebate计划完全基于 Brevis 的 ZK 技术运行,摒弃了对中心化追踪或不透明计算的任何依赖。

rebate计算:路由器可使用 Brevis 托管的 Gas rebate证明系统,为其通过合格 v4 资金池路由的交易生成 ZK 证明。随后,Brevis Pico zkVM 会计算总 Gas 成本,并生成一个汇总的零知识证明,以验证整个计算过程。路由器获得该证明后,即可通过智能合约在链上申领rebate。

申领rebate:路由器将 ZK 证明提交至rebate合约,该合约会验证证明的有效性、确认相关交易尚未获得过rebate,然后发放付款。整个过程自动化且无需信任。

这种方法解决了中心化系统无法实现的难题:可验证的公平性与大规模去中心化追溯奖励。每项计算都由密码学证明支持,任何人都可在链上验证。无需中心化数据库追踪贡献,也无需信任任何中介。路由器获得rebate,Uniswap 基金会实现透明分发,v4 的采用则在维护 DeFi 核心保证的经济支持下得以加速。

加速 v4,恪守 DeFi 原则

此项资助为 Uniswap v4 的蓬勃发展提供了所需动力。它通过为路由器集成 v4 Hook 池提供经济激励,加速了聚合器的采用。随着 v4 资金池流动性加深,用户将享受到更小的点差和更低的滑点。如果路由器将rebate让利给用户,交易者的实际交换成本将进一步降低。

Uniswap v4 通过 Hook 引入了先进的 AMM 功能。Brevis 正在构建相应基础设施,使 v4 的采用对路由器而言具备经济吸引力,同时维护了定义 DeFi 的无需信任保证。凭借 Brevis ZK 证明为rebate系统提供支持,随着 v4 的规模化发展,集成商、交易者和流动性提供者都将从中受益。

关于 Brevis

Brevis 是一个智能可验证计算平台,为现有智能合约区块链提供无限计算能力。通过零知识证明,Brevis 将数据密集型、高成本计算从链上迁移到链下引擎,使 Web3 应用在保持 L1 安全信任前提下无缝扩展。

Пов'язані матеріали

IPO Imminent, OpenAI Faces Major Personnel Upheaval

OpenAI, preparing for a potential IPO, is experiencing significant leadership turmoil. In mid-August 2026, longtime "GPU geek" Scott Gray quietly left, and within three days, Chief Operating Officer Brad Lightcap (8-year veteran) and Chief Revenue Officer Denise Dresser (8-month tenure) departed. This follows a broader exodus of at least 10 senior executives in 2026, including heads of product, safety, and ethics. Analysts view this as a strategic "surgery" to transform from a research lab into a sales-driven enterprise company before going public. Revenue now tilts toward enterprise clients, surpassing consumer income sooner than expected, with annualized revenue reaching $40 billion. The new CRO, Dali Rajic, is a veteran enterprise sales leader. Concurrently, OpenAI has disbanded independent safety teams like "Preparedness," which assessed catastrophic risks, integrating their functions into core research. Critics warn this removes dedicated "brakes" on AI development. The leadership vacuum raises questions about who is the clear second-in-command after former apps CEO Fidji Simo moved to an advisory role. Co-founder Greg Brockman appears to be consolidating power. As OpenAI races against rival Anthropic ($47B annualized revenue), it faces the dual challenge of commercial execution while managing the departure of foundational technical talent and ensuring responsible AI development remains a priority.

marsbit5 хв тому

IPO Imminent, OpenAI Faces Major Personnel Upheaval

marsbit5 хв тому

AI Can 'Have Moods Too'! New Research from USTC: Confusion and Anxiety Make AI Work Better

The article discusses research from the University of Science and Technology of China and Oxford, revealing that allowing AI to recognize and act upon simulated "internal emotions" can significantly improve its performance. The study demonstrates a coherent pairing between specific emotional states in AI agents and their subsequent skill choices. For instance, an agent feeling curious and desirous will search for products, while one feeling confused and tense will rephrase queries. This mirrors human decision-making influenced by emotions. Statistical validation showed a 76.5% semantic consistency in these pairings. Crucially, the research challenges the traditional view of AI errors as flaws to be eliminated. It found that "bad" emotions like confusion, tension, or frustration serve as useful metacognitive signals, indicating a mismatch between the current strategy and the environment. By responding to these signals, AI can proactively adjust before a failure occurs. This is particularly effective in complex tasks prone to failure. For example, in tasks like "heating an item" and "picking up two items," success rates surged from 9.6% to 56.9% and 4.4% to 31.3%, respectively, when using the emotion-driven skill selection method (EMOTION2SKILL). The AI's "nervous" state about a closed microwave, for instance, prompted it to check and open it first, preventing failure. The article also mentions related work from Tianjin University, which embeds emotional prediction into world models (Large Emotional World Model, LEWM), significantly improving prediction accuracy in human-centric environments. Removing emotional data was found to degrade performance even in unrelated logical reasoning tasks. These studies build on earlier findings, like those from Anthropic, that identifiable emotional representations exist within large language models (LLMs). The focus is shifting from philosophical debate about AI emotion to practically harnessing these internal states as functional signals to enhance AI robustness and capability.

marsbit40 хв тому

AI Can 'Have Moods Too'! New Research from USTC: Confusion and Anxiety Make AI Work Better

marsbit40 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片