Canary Awaits SEC Greenlight on XRP And Solana ETFs Amid Shutdown

TheCryptoTimesОпубліковано о 2025-10-10Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-10

Canary Capital is edging closer to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approval for its XRP and Solana (SOL) exchange-traded funds after filing updated registration statements on Friday. 

The firm disclosed a 0.50% sponsor fee for both the Canary XRP ETF and the Canary Marinade SOL ETF, a reduction from the 0.95% set for its earlier HBAR and Litecoin products. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas noted that Canary’s Solana ETF includes staking but won’t distribute staking rewards, signaling final preparations for approval.

The filing comes as several issuers, including those pursuing DOGE and LTC funds, await regulatory clarity under new SEC Chair Paul Atkins, whose crypto-friendly stance has accelerated listing reforms. New standards introduced this quarter could let multiple crypto ETFs list simultaneously without the lengthy 19b-4 process.

However, the U.S. government shutdown has disrupted that momentum. The SEC missed its October 2 deadline for Canary’s Litecoin ETF decision, and while the agency’s new S-1 framework removes strict timelines, it also adds uncertainty. 

SEC readies crypto ETF batch approvals

Canary’s adjustments highlight its persistence in navigating the shifting regulatory landscape. The lowered fees and expanded ETF lineup position it to compete with issuers like Bitwise, which recently set a 0.20% fee for its Solana product, intensifying the race to attract retail and institutional investors seeking exposure to digital assets through regulated channels.

The firm’s progress with XRP and Solana builds on its delayed Litecoin ETF, reflecting a broader strategic push rather than a setback. By focusing on multi-asset approvals under the new administration, Canary is betting on efficiency and compliance as the SEC adapts to a more structured crypto market.

If the SEC batches pending crypto ETFs as expected, Canary could be among the first issuers to launch under the reformed process, marking a turning point for regulated digital-asset products. Its persistence through regulatory gridlock underscores a larger trend: crypto ETFs are shifting from speculation to inevitability, signaling the next phase of institutional adoption.

Also read: DTCC Adds Canary Trump Coin ETF (TRPC) to Listings


Mobile Only Image

Пов'язані матеріали

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

Summary: Over the weekend, a public dispute erupted between Solana's two leading lending protocols, Jupiter Lend and Kamino, centered on the definition of "risk isolation." The conflict began when Kamino's co-founder, Marius Ciubotariu, accused Jupiter Lend of misleading users. He argued that Jupiter's early marketing claimed its lending pools were "risk-isolated," preventing cross-contamination between assets. However, Kamino contends that Jupiter Lend's design, which allows for the rehypothecation (re-use) of collateral across pools, creates a risk of contagion, contradicting its marketing. In response, Jupiter's COO, Kash Dhanda, admitted the initial "zero contagion risk" social media posts were inaccurate and apologized. The debate highlights a core disagreement on the definition of "risk isolation." Jupiter and its supporters argue the term has design flexibility, noting that while pools share a liquidity layer, each has independent parameters. Kamino and its allies insist that any rehypothecation negates true risk isolation. The dispute escalated when Tushar Jain, a partner at Kamino investor Multicoin Capital, strongly criticized Jupiter, accusing the team of being either incompetent or deliberately misleading. In contrast, Solana Foundation President Lily Liu urged for cooperation, emphasizing that the Solana lending market is much smaller than Ethereum's and that internal conflict only helps competitors. The clash is seen as an inevitable result of intense competition. Kamino was long the Solana lending leader, but Jupiter Lend has rapidly gained significant market share. In a tighter market with reduced liquidity and heightened safety concerns, the competition between the two protocols has become increasingly fierce.

marsbit5 хв тому

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

marsbit5 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片