Bitget Report|Earnings Season Fever: Decoding the Explosive Growth in Demand for Tokenized U.S. Stocks

深潮Опубліковано о 2025-12-08Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-08

Анотація

Bitget's internal data reveals a record 450% surge in tokenized U.S. stock trading activity during the recent earnings season (mid-October to November), driven by three key factors: asset characteristics, 24/7 market accessibility, and distinct user behavior patterns. In the futures market, trading concentrated heavily on mega-cap tech stocks like Tesla, Meta, and MicroStrategy, reflecting aggressive, high-risk speculation around earnings volatility. In contrast, the spot market showed a more balanced strategy, combining tech leaders like NVIDIA with defensive assets such as treasury ETFs (TLT surged 69,573% monthly) for risk diversification. The 24/7 trading model eliminated time-zone barriers, enabling global participants—especially in East Asia (39.66% of users)—to trade during pre-market, core, and post-market windows. User behavior split between high-frequency "whales" traders and more passive retail investors, indicating a maturing, structured market. This convergence of strategic diversity, global accessibility, and behavioral segmentation signals the maturation of tokenized stocks into mainstream global investing.

Introduction: Three Forces Driving a Global Trading Phenomenon

Bitget internal data shows a significant surge in tokenized U.S. stock trading activity during the recent earnings season (mid-October to late November). Market participation was exceptionally high during this period, with demand soaring by a record 450%. The growth momentum was widespread across both spot and futures markets, with quarter-on-quarter trading volumes increasing by 452% and 4,468% respectively.

This "earnings season fever" is not an isolated event but is driven by three powerful and interconnected forces that define a new era in global stock trading. These three forces are the characteristics of the trading assets, the global accessibility provided by 24-hour markets, and the unique behavioral patterns exhibited by participants. This report will analyze each of these three forces in detail, providing a comprehensive and in-depth analysis of this increasingly mature global market phenomenon.

Part One: Assets - A Tale of Two Markets: Futures and Spot

Analysis of popular assets is crucial for understanding the motivations of market participants. Earnings season data reveals a clear strategic divergence between the futures and spot markets, profoundly reflecting the differentiated trading objectives of traders and investors.

"The futures market exhibits an aggressive trading style, characterized by high-leverage earnings speculation and concentration in tech giants, while the spot market adopts a more balanced strategy, achieving an offensive and defensive positioning through diversified allocation."

Futures Market: High-Leverage Bets on Tech Giants

The stock futures market has become a stage for aggressive speculative trading, with activity highly concentrated in a few mega-cap technology companies. Traders use these instruments to make directional bets on earnings-driven volatility. In fact, seven of the top ten stock futures by trading volume were mega-cap tech companies, indicating strong market positioning intent.

The top five U.S. stock futures by trading volume are as follows:

• Tesla (TSLA): $2.54 billion

• Meta (META): $2.05 billion

• MicroStrategy (MSTR): $1.43 billion

• Apple (AAPL): $1.03 billion

• Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ): $460 million

The strong holdings in key tech stocks can be seen in their explosive quarter-on-quarter volume growth. Meta futures volume surged by 40,774%, Microsoft grew by 24,339%, and MicroStrategy increased by 11,684%. This high concentration points to a clear strategic intent: traders are actively positioning themselves to profit from earnings season price volatility, AI strategy developments, and the volatility inherent in high-liquidity tech stocks.

More notably, the appearance of the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) and MicroStrategy (MSTR) in the top five by volume reveals a deeper strategic dimension. The active trading of QQQ highlights its value as an efficient hedging tool—helping investors heavily invested in tech stocks manage systemic risk, or gain overall sector exposure while avoiding individual stock risk. The consistently high volume of MicroStrategy reflects the market's pursuit of cryptocurrency-related stocks, as it has become an important indirect exposure to this sector.

Spot Market: A Balanced Strategy Weighing Both Star Tech Stocks and Defensive Assets

In stark contrast to the狂热 speculation of the futures market, spot investors adopted a more balanced and diversified allocation strategy. While focusing on market leaders, they diversified risk through index ETFs and allocated defensive assets to cope with earnings season uncertainty. This offensive and defensive layout highlights that investors value risk management while pursuing growth.

The spot market strategy is built on three pillars:

• Tech Leader Allocation: Nvidia (NVDA) became the leader in the spot market with approximately $30 million in volume and a 1888% month-on-month increase, highlighting the continued focus on core tech assets with long-term growth potential. Star tech companies like Tesla, Amazon, and Apple also ranked among the top in trading volume.

• Indexed Diversification: Tokenized ETF trading volume grew significantly, with the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) growing 3492% month-on-month and the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) growing 3247%, indicating that investors are implementing risk diversification and macro allocation through index tools.

• Surge in Demand for Safe-Haven Assets: The long-term Treasury ETF (TLT) saw an astonishing monthly volume growth of 69,573%, reflecting a sophisticated defensive allocation strategy. This layout provides a dual protection mechanism: it can serve as a hedge in case earnings fall short of expectations (safe-haven flows typically push up bond prices), and it can also bet on the possibility of Fed rate cuts if the economy weakens (falling yields will boost long-duration bond prices).

This "offensive and defensive" balanced strategy in the spot market demonstrates a more cautious long-term allocation approach.

Part Two: Access - How 5x24 Hour Trading Unleashes Global User Participation Potential

The 5x24 trading model has evolved from an innovative feature to infrastructure for global market participation. This is not just an extension of trading hours, but a structural change that eliminates time zone barriers, creating unprecedented opportunities for a diverse range of global investors. This model allows market participants to flexibly grasp pre-market information, make post-market strategy adjustments, or implement precise allocations during local trading hours.

Peak Trading Hours Analysis and the Winning Strategy for Investors

Analysis of 5x24 hour all-day trading volume reveals how global investors, particularly in Asia, are turning this mechanism of continuous participation into a strategic advantage. Three key trading windows can be identified, each serving a unique function:

• Core U.S. Trading Hours (UTC 16:00-20:00): This window coincides with traditional U.S. stock trading hours and is the most concentrated phase of trading, especially towards the close. However, for Asian investors, this window presents significant participation barriers, highlighting the unique value of earlier trading windows.

• Asian Afternoon / U.S. Pre-Market Hours (UTC 08:00-10:00): This is the most active window outside regular trading hours. It holds critical value for Asian investors as it coincides with their local afternoon, allowing them to respond promptly to overnight news and earnings, gaining a crucial pre-market positioning advantage without needing to trade at night.

• U.S. After-Hours Trading (UTC 20:00-23:00): Although trading volume is at its daily low during this phase, it provides important emergency adjustment capability. Investors can react immediately to post-market corporate announcements, adjusting positions in time to avoid uncontrollable overnight risk.

This democratization of market participation ensures that market access is no longer limited by geography, leading to our in-depth analysis of the global participants reshaping the market landscape.

Part Three: Participants - A Diverse Global User Base and Divergent Trading Behaviors

Analysis of user geographical distribution and trading frequency shows a market that is both globally diverse and stratified by behavior. The surge in trading activity was led by sophisticated investors from East Asia and presents two distinct trading profiles: high-frequency "whale" traders and relatively passive "retail" investors.

Regional Distribution: East Asia Leads, Exploring Potential Markets

The user composition clearly demonstrates the global nature of demand for tokenized U.S. stocks, with various regional markets showing distinct characteristics and growth potential:

· East Asia: 39.66%

· Latin America: 8.29%

· South Asia: 7.76%

· Southeast Asia: 5.91%

· Europe: A key market with huge growth potential

A deeper look at the characteristics of each regional market reveals:

· East Asian Market: As the largest and most mature user group, investors show strong interest in U.S. tech giants and global asset allocation, despite significant time zone and language barriers.

· European Market: With smaller time zone differences and a mature culture of global asset allocation, it naturally possesses enormous expansion potential and is a highly valuable growth area.

· Emerging Markets (Latin America and Asia): On a fast development track, dual drivers of internet penetration and fintech adoption are continuously stimulating user demand to participate in the world's largest stock market.

Trading Behavior Analysis: Behavioral Differences Between Whales and Retail Investors

Segmenting users based on trading value, the top 30% by trading volume are defined as "whales," and the remaining 70% as "retail investors." Analysis of them reveals fundamental behavioral differences between the most active and the least active participants in the market.

The huge difference in trading frequency highlights fundamental differences between the two types of market participants in terms of information access, analytical tools, and risk tolerance. These differences reflect an essential distinction in market participation structure, not merely personal preference.

Conclusion: Global Markets Enter a New Stage of Maturity and Inclusivity

The in-depth analysis in this report focusing on assets, access, and participants leads to a strong conclusion about the increasing maturity of the global market for tokenized stocks. Market evolution is reflected in three core themes:

1. Strategic Diversification: The market is not a single landscape; it can support both aggressive event-driven speculation in the futures market and balanced, long-term portfolio allocation in the spot market, reflecting a mature and efficient user base.

2. Participatory Inclusivity: 5x24 hour trading has transformed from a peripheral feature to a fundamental element of a truly global market. Time zone barriers are eliminated, allowing investors from all over the world to participate fairly, significantly lowering market access barriers.

3. Behavioral Stratification: The clear stratification between high-frequency "whales" and cautious "retail investors" demonstrates an orderly market ecosystem. This structured participation indicates that the market can accommodate investors with different strategies and risk appetites coexisting.

"The convergence of these three major forces signals that tokenized stocks are becoming a mainstream component of the modern global investment landscape."

Пов'язані питання

QWhat were the three key forces driving the surge in tokenized U.S. stock trading activity during the recent earnings season, according to the Bitget report?

AThe three key forces were: 1) The characteristics of the trading assets, 2) The global accessibility provided by 24-hour markets, and 3) The unique behavioral patterns exhibited by participants.

QWhich five tokenized U.S. stock contracts had the highest trading volume, and what was the top one?

AThe top five were: 1) Tesla (TSLA) at $2.54 billion, 2) Meta (META) at $2.05 billion, 3) MicroStrategy (MSTR) at $1.43 billion, 4) Apple (AAPL) at $1.03 billion, and 5) Nasdaq-100 ETF (QQQ) at $460 million.

QHow did the trading strategy in the spot market differ from the contract market, as highlighted in the report?

AThe contract market was characterized by aggressive, high-leverage speculation concentrated on mega-cap tech stocks. In contrast, the spot market employed a more balanced, diversified strategy that included tech leaders, index ETFs for risk dispersion, and defensive assets like long-term treasury ETFs for hedging.

QWhich global region was the largest source of users for tokenized U.S. stock trading, and what was its percentage share?

AEast Asia was the largest source of users, accounting for 39.66% of the total.

QWhat are the three key trading time windows identified in the 5x24 trading model, and which one is most strategically valuable for Asian investors?

AThe three windows are: 1) Core U.S. trading hours (UTC 16:00-20:00), 2) Asian afternoon/U.S. pre-market (UTC 08:00-10:00), and 3) U.S. post-market (UTC 20:00-23:00). The Asian afternoon/U.S. pre-market window (UTC 08:00-10:00) is most valuable for Asian investors as it allows them to react to overnight news and earnings during their local afternoon, providing a pre-market positioning advantage without night trading.

Пов'язані матеріали

Altcoin: The ETF Boom Explodes – XRP, SOL, LTC, HBAR, DOGE, LINK, and the Emergence of New Opportunities

While the spotlight has been on Solana (SOL) ETFs, which have attracted approximately $682 million in inflows, XRP ETFs have quietly surpassed them with $874 million, despite launching later. Simultaneously, a new wave of altcoin ETFs for LTC, HBAR, DOGE, and LINK has entered the market, each recording modest but stable inflows since their debut. Seven separate Solana ETFs have generated $618.62 million in net inflows, holding $915.08 million in assets under management, representing about 1.15% of Solana's market cap. In contrast, four XRP ETFs have attracted $874.28 million, with Canary's XRPC leading at $357 million. The newly launched altcoin ETFs for LINK, HBAR, LTC, and DOGE have collectively seen $133.46 million in net inflows. Grayscale's GLNK attracted $40.90 million, Canary's LTCC (Litecoin) drew $7.67 million, and its HBR (HBAR) ETF recorded $82.04 million. Two DOGE ETFs brought in $2.85 million. This expansion signals a new market phase of diverse choices and intense competition. However, these new altcoin ETFs remain far behind the established Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs in terms of total capital. Amid this ETF boom, Bitcoin Hyper (HYPER) is emerging as a potential altcoin outside the traditional ETF scope. It's a Bitcoin Layer-2 project built on the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM), combining Solana's speed with Bitcoin's security. Having raised nearly $29 million in its presale, it offers a fixed supply of 21 billion tokens and 40% staking APY, positioning itself to unlock Bitcoin's potential in DeFi.

bitcoinist20 хв тому

Altcoin: The ETF Boom Explodes – XRP, SOL, LTC, HBAR, DOGE, LINK, and the Emergence of New Opportunities

bitcoinist20 хв тому

Polymarket Revival: The Mainstreaming of Crypto Prediction Markets and Future Prospects

Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market platform, has made a significant comeback in 2025 by re-entering the U.S. market through regulatory-compliant means, including the acquisition of regulated trading and清算 entities. This resurgence is further supported by institutional capital investment and integration with mainstream platforms like the MetaMask wallet, allowing users to trade directly without leaving their wallets. Mainstream financial data platforms have also begun displaying prediction market data, increasing market visibility. Once viewed primarily as a gambling or speculative platform, Polymarket is increasingly recognized as a mechanism for information pricing in financial markets. Widespread participation from both retail and institutional users has made its probability assessments of future events more representative and liquid. Prediction market data is now being incorporated by traditional financial media and data platforms, highlighting its growing potential. However, challenges remain. Prediction markets are not always accurate, with studies showing limited predictive reliability in certain contexts. Questions about platform neutrality and business models have emerged, such as the employment of internal market makers, which could undermine trust. Information asymmetry and insider risks are inherent, potentially disadvantaging ordinary users when some participants access information early. Regulatory, tax, and disclosure requirements also present ongoing uncertainties. The revival and transformation of Polymarket signify a broader shift of prediction markets from niche experiments toward mainstream financial infrastructure. By converting public expectations into tradable probabilities, these markets may complement traditional analysis and polling, providing real-time, decentralized signals in areas like macroeconomics, policy, technology, and geopolitics. As traditional financial institutions invest in compliance and structured products, DeFi is evolving beyond an alternative asset pool to resemble traditional financial infrastructure. Prediction market applications are expanding beyond crypto to potentially include stocks, macroeconomic indicators, sports events, and tech product launches, tightening the link between crypto and the real world. If platforms like Polymarket continue on a path of compliance, stable operation, and integration with mainstream financial services, they could become next-generation market infrastructures—event-driven financial tools alongside stocks, bonds, and options. Key factors for development include platform neutrality, prediction accuracy, regulatory environment, participant diversity, and the maturity of related financial products. In summary, Polymarket’s comeback represents a move of prediction markets from the fringe into the core of financial systems, reflecting deeper changes in how information is priced and how financial infrastructure is rebuilt. This shift brings not only new trading methods but also potential changes in how investors perceive and engage with future events and asset valuation.

cointelegraph_中文58 хв тому

Polymarket Revival: The Mainstreaming of Crypto Prediction Markets and Future Prospects

cointelegraph_中文58 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片