Cap Surpasses $200M TVL As Stablecoin Protocol Gains Traction

TheCryptoTimesОпубліковано о 2025-10-03Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-03

Cap, a stablecoin protocol built on Ethereum, has surpassed $200 million in total value locked (TVL). According to the project’s update, $183 million comes from USDC collateral supporting its cUSD stablecoin, while roughly $30 million stems from SymbioticFi delegations by partners including Hyperithm, MEV Capital, Renzo Protocol, Concrete, and Re7 Labs.

Unlike conventional stablecoins, Cap introduces a model where yield generation is outsourced to whitelisted operators such as banks, high-frequency trading firms, and RWA protocols. 

The framework rests on three actors: minters, operators, and restakers. Minters hold cUSD pegged 1:1 with USDC/USDT, operators access delegated liquidity to execute strategies, and restakers provide security to ensure the system remains fully covered.

Through this structure, yield is distributed back to stablecoin holders and restakers, while operators retain their performance margins. Cap’s smart contracts enforce penalties and rewards, aiming to balance returns with systemic protection.

DeFi growth echoes TVL breakout moments

Cap’s $200 million TVL milestone comes days after decentralized perpetuals exchange Aster reported surpassing $1 billion in TVL, alongside 330,000 new users after launching its $ASTER token on BNB Chain. 

Aster also logged $345 million in trading volume within 24 hours of its debut, highlighting how fast liquidity can consolidate around protocols promising capital efficiency and market access.

While Cap is carving out its niche in stablecoin yield generation, Aster’s rapid climb illustrates a parallel surge of interest in decentralized trading platforms. Both projects reflect a wider narrative in the Decentralized Finance (DeFi): protocols that combine clear collateral mechanics with scalable user incentives are drawing substantial inflows despite market volatility.

Together, both underscore the diversification of DeFi adoption across different verticals. Cap leans on stablecoin infrastructure and outsourced yield strategies, while Aster focuses on derivatives and trading activity at scale. Their simultaneous TVL milestones suggest that investor demand is not confined to a single category but spans from stable yields to speculative trading. 

Also Read: Solana Hits $241 as TVL and Institutional Interest Surges


Mobile Only Image

Пов'язані матеріали

UBS: The Crowdedness of A-Share Tech Stocks Is Far From Reaching Historical Peaks

UBS: A-share tech stocks still far from peak crowding levels A-shares' technology sector has seen a strong rebound, with trading activity hitting record highs, raising concerns about market crowding. However, UBS Securities argues that a key indicator of institutional positioning suggests the current crowding level remains well below historical peaks. While the large-cap tech sector's share of total A-share trading volume and market capitalization have reached historical highs, the overweight ratio of domestic mutual funds in this sector stood at 9.9% in Q1 2026. This is down from 11.6% in Q3 2025 and significantly lower than the historical peak of 14.1% in Q4 2015. It also pales in comparison to the historical peak overweight of 18.7% for the consumer sector. UBS notes that typical cycles from a low to a peak in fund overweighting last about three years, and the current outperformance of the tech/growth style has lasted less than two years since the policy pivot in September 2024. UBS expects A-share earnings recovery to accelerate, providing fundamental support. It forecasts 2026 A-share profit growth to rise to 11% from 3.9% in 2025. Non-financial A-share profits grew 11.8% YoY in Q1 2026, with gross and net profit margins at their highest since 2023. Persistent fund inflows, the expansion of thematic ETFs, and a recovery in private fund issuance are supporting market liquidity. In tactical allocation, UBS favors growth and cyclical styles under its "slow bull" base case, with overweight ratings on six sectors: Electronics (benefiting from semiconductor inventory recovery and AI innovation), Communications (driven by AI computing demand), Machinery (aided by domestic capex recovery), Non-ferrous Metals (due to rising copper/aluminum prices), Chemicals (supported by anti-involution policies), and Electrical Equipment (driven by policy support and AI data center power demand).

marsbit8 хв тому

UBS: The Crowdedness of A-Share Tech Stocks Is Far From Reaching Historical Peaks

marsbit8 хв тому

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

SpaceX is preparing for a massive IPO aiming to raise around $75 billion at a valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion. While its achievements in reusable rockets and the profitable Starlink satellite internet service are clear, the market is concerned about the aggressive valuation. Key issues include: the current $1.75 trillion valuation, which is about 94 times 2025 revenue, seems to price in not just existing businesses but also unproven future ventures like AI infrastructure and orbital data centers. Financially, while Starlink is profitable, the AI division, bolstered by the acquisition of xAI, is incurring massive losses and consuming the majority of capital expenditures. This acquisition also introduced complex related-party financing arrangements and debt onto SpaceX's balance sheet. Furthermore, corporate governance poses a challenge. SpaceX's dual-class share structure ensures founder Elon Musk retains absolute control, limiting ordinary shareholders' influence over high-risk, long-term strategic decisions. The future success of ambitious projects like the Starship rocket—critical for lowering costs and enabling new services—remains a significant variable for the valuation. In summary, the market's apprehension (FUD) centers not on doubting SpaceX's past technological triumphs but on questioning how much premium public investors should pay for a future that combines proven profits with highly speculative and capital-intensive new ventures, all under a governance structure that offers limited shareholder oversight.

marsbit1 год тому

Should You Buy SpaceX Stock at $1.7 Trillion? Here's What the Market Is Worried About

marsbit1 год тому

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

Vitalik Buterin has proposed a new DeFi design to eliminate the automatic liquidation mechanism that causes market instability during sharp downturns. The current system, used by protocols like Aave, triggers forced sales when collateral value falls below a threshold, often exacerbating price drops and creating systemic selling pressure. Buterin's alternative model is based on splitting an asset like ETH into two synthetic option-like tokens, P and N, pegged to a price index. Their combined value always equals one ETH. Instead of sudden liquidation, a position's value gradually drifts from its target peg if the market moves. Users must proactively rebalance their holdings to maintain their desired exposure, transferring the management burden from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on real-time oracles. Pricing decisions are deferred until contract expiry, allowing for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. This removes a clear liquidation threshold that speculators can target for manipulation or MEV extraction. However, significant challenges remain. Frequent rebalancing could incur high slippage and transaction costs, necessitating new liquidity provider models. The design is better suited for hedging instruments than for stablecoins requiring a rigid 1:1 peg. While not an immediate replacement for existing systems, the proposal challenges the foundational assumption that instantaneous forced liquidation is an unavoidable necessity in DeFi, opening the door for fundamentally different risk management architectures.

marsbit1 год тому

Breaking the DeFi Cascading Liquidation Curse: Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片