Неизвестные вывели $11,3 млн из UXLINK и обрушили цену токена на 42%

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2025-10-21Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-21

Сервис мониторинга Cyvers Alerts сообщил о выводе $11,3 млн из UXLINK. По данным аналитиков, один из адресов через delegateCall удалил роль администратора, добавил новый мультисиг-кошелек и сразу провел серию переводов. С хранилища было выведено около $4 млн в USDT, $500 тыс. в USDC, 3,7 WBTC и 25 ETH. Все стейблкоины были конвертированы в DAI и ETH, а часть активов перемещена через Arbitrum.

Спустя несколько минут другой адрес получил 10 млн токенов UXLINK, что оценивалось примерно в $3 млн. Их тут же начали массово продавать их на рынке, создав дополнительное давление. При этом часть активов до сих пор не реализована — на кошельке остается около $2,2 млн. Такая динамика вызвала сильные подозрения в масштабной атаке или внутреннем сбое безопасности.

На фоне этих транзакций стоимость UXLINK обрушилась более чем на 42%. Резкий рост объемов торгов сопровождался ликвидациями и падением открытого интереса. Ситуация полностью напоминает классический эксплойт или атаку с использованием уязвимости смарт-контракта. Рынок отреагировал паникой, а трейдеры начали фиксировать убытки.

Данные показывают, что резко усилилось давление со стороны продавцов. Массовые продажи продолжались несколько часов и это усугубило ситуацию. Социальные сети быстро заполнились негативными комментариями и предупреждениями от известных аналитиков. Многие отметили высокий риск дальнейшего падения и назвали ситуацию тревожной.

Примечательно, что за 16 часов до этого официальный аккаунт UXLINK опубликовал короткое сообщение «Big things coming. Soon.». Такой пост вызвал еще больше вопросов и критику сообщества. После инцидента комментариев от команды пока не поступило.

Эксперты считают, что восстановление цен и доверия будет зависеть от того, как быстро разработчики предоставят прозрачное объяснение происходящего. Если инцидент окажется эксплойтом, а коммуникация останется слабой, цена токена может долго находиться под давлением.

Пов'язані матеріали

Bittensor's Intellectual Arbitrage Trap: Capital Only Speculates on Tokens, Quality AI Goes Unpaid

The article critiques the inherent flaws in the Bittensor network's decentralized AI incentive model. While designed to use TAO tokens to reward AI development across specialized subnets (like model training or data crawling), the system prioritizes capital flow over genuine utility. A subnet's reward allocation is primarily determined by the price of its native Alpha token, creating a self-reinforcing loop where buying pressure begets more rewards, detached from the actual quality or real-world adoption of the AI services. Critical vulnerabilities are exposed: the scoring mechanism for AI outputs can be gamed if a majority of validators collude, and "score copying" among validators is possible. The network's value is anchored to speculative trading rather than verified user demand or revenue. Despite these issues, the author acknowledges Bittensor's potential to foster open, distributed AI infrastructure, similar to how past tech bubbles built lasting assets. The pending approval of Bittensor ETFs could bring both significant capital and necessary regulatory scrutiny, potentially forcing the ecosystem to mature and align incentives with tangible value creation.

Foresight News34 хв тому

Bittensor's Intellectual Arbitrage Trap: Capital Only Speculates on Tokens, Quality AI Goes Unpaid

Foresight News34 хв тому

‘Walled off’ – Hyperliquid, Phantom press CFTC for 3 DeFi demands

Hyperliquid and Solana-based wallet Phantom have urged the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to modernize regulations for decentralized finance (DeFi). In a letter, they made three key requests: first, that non-custodial software developers not be automatically treated as brokers or exchanges; second, that existing no-action relief for self-custodial wallets be formalized into guidance; and third, that the CFTC create a framework allowing regulated entities to use blockchain for trading and settlement. They argue these changes are necessary to prevent stifling innovation and pushing activity offshore. The request responds to a CFTC inquiry on barriers to fintech partnerships. Similar exemptions are under discussion in the proposed CLARITY Act. However, granting these requests could face legal challenges from traditional market participants like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), which has previously sued the CFTC over crypto product approvals. Traditional players argue DeFi platforms should meet the same regulatory standards as conventional exchanges. With the CLARITY Act's future uncertain, any CFTC action on DeFi exemptions may lead to further litigation.

ambcrypto38 хв тому

‘Walled off’ – Hyperliquid, Phantom press CFTC for 3 DeFi demands

ambcrypto38 хв тому

Walsh Is Quietly Reshaping the Federal Reserve Through Five Working Groups

In an effort to subtly reshape the Federal Reserve, Chair Kevin Wash has established five "Chair's Advancement of Monetary Policy" working groups. These groups, led entirely by 15 external experts and supported by Fed staff, cover the entire monetary policy "operating system": data inputs, productivity/employment/inflation models, balance sheet tools, and external communications. The initiative centralizes agenda-setting, knowledge production, data access, and public narrative control under the Chair's office, while formal decision-making power remains with the FOMC and Board. Analysts note this mirrors tactics like China's use of central working groups—bypassing bureaucratic inertia, creating parallel reporting channels, and enabling rapid "top-level design" to reset policy agendas. This suggests Wash may hold off on major policy moves until the groups conclude their studies. Key future questions are whether these groups become permanent and if their conclusions effectively become pre-determined policy for the FOMC to ratify.

marsbit1 год тому

Walsh Is Quietly Reshaping the Federal Reserve Through Five Working Groups

marsbit1 год тому

WEEX TradFi Trading Competition Kicks Off, 50,000 USDT Prize Pool First-Come, First-Served, Open a Position and Get 5 U

WEEX Exchange Launches "TradFi Trading Competition" with a 50,000 USDT Prize Pool Amidst a crypto market downturn, WEEX Exchange highlights the growth of tokenized traditional finance (TradFi) assets as a key trend, allowing users to trade stocks, ETFs, and commodities using crypto. The platform has launched a "TradFi Trading Competition" from July 9th to 23rd, featuring a 50,000 USDT prize pool. The campaign offers three reward tiers: 1. **New User Bonus (25,000 USDT pool):** New users depositing ≥100 USDT, completing a specified spot trade, and one TradFi contract trade (margin ≥10 USDT) receive 200 USDT. 2. **Volume-Based Rewards (20,000 USDT pool):** All users can earn tiered bonuses for achieving TradFi contract trading volumes of 5,000 USDT (3 USDT), 20,000 USDT (10 USDT), and 100,000 USDT (50 USDT). Rewards are stackable. 3. **Participation Reward:** Any user opening a TradFi contract trade during the event receives 5 USDT instantly. The article promotes WEEX's TradFi features, which include trading tokenized shares of companies like NVIDIA and Tesla using USDT, 24/7 trading, fractional share investing starting from $5, and high leverage up to 100x for hedging. It positions these features as solutions to traditional investing barriers like high fees, strict trading hours, and high share prices. The summary concludes by encouraging users to join the competition and leverage WEEX's platform to access global TradFi markets.

marsbit1 год тому

WEEX TradFi Trading Competition Kicks Off, 50,000 USDT Prize Pool First-Come, First-Served, Open a Position and Get 5 U

marsbit1 год тому

Switching Chains for Another Shot at Success: Can It Really 'Change One's Destiny'?

Recent months have witnessed a wave of established blockchain projects migrating to new public chains, notably Base and Arbitrum, coupled with strategic pivots in their business models—essentially "re-starting" elsewhere. Examples include Sophon (moving from ZKsync to Base to cut $3M+ annual costs and focus on consumer apps), Moonbeam (shifting from Polkadot to Base to pursue decentralized AI), and Secret Network (planning a move from Cosmos to Arbitrum to explore privacy-AI integrations, though its token price plunged 30% post-announcement). A common thread is that these migrating projects are primarily layer-1 or layer-2 chains now seeking relevance in AI and real-world consumer applications. This trend highlights the relative stagnation of ecosystems like Polkadot and Cosmos, which are seeing significant outflows. However, the community remains skeptical about whether such chain-hopping truly enables a turnaround. Historical cases like y00ts NFTs (which moved from Solana to Polygon and back to Ethereum) and Synthetix (which retreated from a multi-chain strategy) show that migration often fails to deliver expected benefits and can add complexity. In today's more rational market, devoid of easy narrative or airdrop红利, simply changing chains is unlikely to be a silver bullet. For both migrating projects and destination chains, the real challenge lies not in attracting projects but in developing actual use cases that retain users.

marsbit1 год тому

Switching Chains for Another Shot at Success: Can It Really 'Change One's Destiny'?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот