链上“魅影”：超550亿USDT流转背后的汇旺支付

marsbitОпубліковано о 2025-06-23Востаннє оновлено о 2025-06-24

随着全球打击网络诈骗、地下支付网络和非法跨境洗钱活动的力度持续加大，名为汇旺支付(HuionePay) 的平台引起了监管的高度关注。该平台涉嫌被用于诈骗资金的接收、转移及出金，尤其是在 TRON 链上通过 USDT 频繁进行链上操作。

为进一步揭示其链上行为特征，慢雾(SlowMist) 基于链上反洗钱与追踪工具 MistTrack 与链上公开数据构建了 Dune 数据统计面板，并在此基础上开展了对汇旺支付(HuionePay) 在 TRON 链上 USDT 存取行为的深入分析。

注：本文数据时间范围为 2024 年 1 月 1 日至 2025 年 6 月 23 日，数据源自慢雾(SlowMist) 制作的数据统计面板：https://dune.com/misttrack/huionepay-data。

链上资金流动

汇旺支付(HuionePay)总存取金额(Sum)

提现总额：57,246,854,379 USDT
存款总额：54,475,887,524 USDT

存取金额均超过 500 亿 USDT，显示出汇旺支付(HuionePay) 在过去一年半内持续存在大量资金流入与流出，且提现金额始终高于存款金额，两者差值达 27.71 亿 USDT，有较明显的“资金净流出”特征。

每周资金动向(Value Statis)

图表数据显示，汇旺支付(HuionePay)平台上的资金流动持续活跃，并在以下三个时间节点出现峰值：

2024 年 7 月 8 日：首次出现明显高峰，充值与提现均突破 10 亿 USDT。
2025 年 3 月与 5 月：两次提现金额接近或超过 11 亿 USDT。

存款/ 提现交易笔数(Tx Count)

数据显示，提现交易笔数自 2024 年 2 月起呈阶梯式上升，在 2025 年 5 月 12 日达到峰值，单日接近 15 万笔，呈现出“高频提款”特征。

相较之下，存款交易数量虽整体增长，但波动较小，存款笔数也稳步增长至每日近 14 万笔，整体用户活跃度并未明显下降。

此外，2025 年 3 月与 5 月的提现金额高峰伴随着交易笔数的同步上涨，两个高峰几乎重合。

用户行为

存取用户数(Users)

自 2024 年初以来，汇旺支付(HuionePay) 在 TRON 链上的活跃存款地址数量从不足 3 万增长至超过 8 万，呈现出稳定增长趋势。需要说明的是，图表数据按地址去重统计，即存款地址大致可视为用户数量，而提现地址则可能为用户自定义的接收地址，无法等同实际用户。存款地址数量的持续增长表明平台仍在不断吸引新用户，不过增长速度呈缓和态势。

活跃地址

提现地址Top 3

我们使用链上反洗钱与追踪工具 MistTrack 进行分析，汇旺支付(HuionePay) 平台的提现行为呈现出一定程度的“资金集中”特征。其中，排名前三的提现地址如下：

地址1 — TWS84SZ2GE2EgyZDCrfVuEJXpoXYuBxteS — 8.16 亿 USDT
地址2 — T9yFi9yxwBUjMbHwBFKDdwFdBwvzUAqBfR — 5.8 亿 USDT
地址3 — TTSSC4TEYtQMAMURND6i1FPYaaBJMGY4ed — 5.12 亿 USDT

上述地址的最早交易均可以追溯至 2023 年，长期活跃，链上痕迹丰富。

地址 1 不仅从多个汇旺支付(HuionePay)热钱包提币，还与被 MistTrack 标记为“OFAC Sanctions”、“Theft”、“BingX Exploiter”的地址存在交互：

地址2 疑似为好旺担保（原汇旺担保）平台控制的钱包地址。

地址3 与多个交易平台发生交互：

存款地址Top 3

地址4 — TL8TBpubVzBr1UWPXBXU8Pci5ZAip9SwEf — 16.65 亿 USDT
地址5 — TPEpdLYtHr8cN1Jbwf6CGNB9Ppho7L2otr — 4.49 亿 USDT
地址6 — TM1zzNDZD2DPASbKcgdVoTYhfmYgtfwx9R — 4.36 亿 USDT

其中，地址4 的存款高达 16 亿 USDT，为提现金额最高地址的 1.3 倍，最早一笔交易可追溯至 2022 年，疑似为好旺担保（原汇旺担保）平台控制的钱包地址。此外，地址 5 和地址 6 疑似为某平台热钱包地址。

活跃时间

我们随机选取了 10 个在汇旺支付(HuionePay) 进行存款和提现的普通地址，对其操作时间(UTC) 进行统计如下图：

被选取地址的提现交易主要集中在 UTC 时间 01:00 – 16:00，其中 07:00 – 13:00 为高频时段。个别地址，如 TUXsppberDuVqQmNN5mnxg4pJ3HU9YtCEw 在 02:00 – 03:00 出现交易突增。部分提现地址在 15:00 – 次日 00:00 几乎无交易。

被选取地址的存款操作主要集中在 UTC 时间 03:00 – 10:00，与提现地址的活跃时段部分重合。其中，存款地址 TRAA9R9151eE522crrxQgQTr9WGVRubmou 和 TEdVW72PWcJ9Fwmw3w9uSBTLK6rjRUM1GJ 在 03:00 – 09:00 表现出稳定的资金存入行为。

国际监管动态补充

近期的一系列国际监管与执法动态加剧了对 HuionePay 的关注：

2024 年 7 月 14 日，Bitrace 表示，Tether 冻结了与 Huione 有关的地址 TNVaKW，金额高达 2,962 万 USDT，该地址疑为担保相关操作钱包。
2025 年 5 月 2 日，美国财政部金融犯罪执法网络(FinCEN) 提议禁止美国金融机构为总部位于柬埔寨的 Huione Group 提供代理账户服务。美国财政部长称 Huione 是“网络犯罪分子的首选市场”，涉及平台包括 Huione Pay、Huione Crypto 及 Haowang Guarantee 等。
2025 年 5 月 8 日，联合国毒品和犯罪问题办公室(UNODC) 在其报告中指出，Huione Guarantee 已成为东南亚“网络诈骗产业化生态系统”的一部分，其平台累计接收超 240 亿美元加密资金。
2025 年 5 月 14 日，Elliptic 报告称，Telegram 封禁了数千个与“Xinbi 担保”相关的加密犯罪频道，平台处理超 84 亿美元可疑交易，与 Huione Group 并列最大加密黑市。
2025 年 5 月 15 日，好旺担保（原汇旺担保）在官网宣布因被 Telegram 屏蔽，将正式停止运营。

写在最后

汇旺支付(HuionePay) 在 TRON 链上的资金流动情况、交易频次、活跃地址为进一步理解其链上活动提供了基础数据支持。

Пов'язані матеріали

Anthropic Employees Leave to Start a Business, Valued at $1 Billion, Also Focused on 'Recursive Self-Improvement'

Former Anthropic employees Behnam Neyshabur and Harsh Mehta have founded a startup named Mirendil, securing $200 million in seed funding at a $1 billion valuation from investors including Andreessen Horowitz, Kleiner Perkins, and NVIDIA. The company, staffed by researchers from Anthropic, xAI, Google DeepMind, and OpenAI, aims to accelerate scientific discovery by focusing on "recursive self-improvement" for AI. Their vision, described as "AI for AI for Science," is to build a platform enabling research labs in fields like medicine and materials science to develop and iteratively improve their own specialized AI models, rather than relying on general-purpose models from large tech firms. Neyshabur argues this approach, involving AI that can optimize its own code under human supervision, is the fastest path to AI-accelerated science. The founders believe a market opportunity exists because major AI companies, while increasingly using AI to advance their own research, restrict external developers from using their models to train competing products. Mirendil plans to release its first models soon to gather early user feedback, with the goal of empowering thousands of labs to tackle critical scientific challenges.

marsbit21 хв тому

Anthropic Employees Leave to Start a Business, Valued at $1 Billion, Also Focused on 'Recursive Self-Improvement'

marsbit21 хв тому

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

Franklin Templeton has filed to launch two ETFs that embed a "default configuration" logic into Bitcoin investment, aiming to tap into massive pension fund flows. These "Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment Index ETFs" will initially hold 95% equities and 5% Bitcoin, automatically reinvesting stock dividends to buy Bitcoin. However, a quarterly rebalancing rule forces selling of Bitcoin if its allocation exceeds 5%, capping its maximum holding at 20%. While the product cleverly circumvents advisor reluctance and compliance hurdles by labeling itself as a U.S. equity product, its actual Bitcoin buying power is minimal. Given low dividend yields (e.g., ~1% for broad market indices), annual Bitcoin purchases from a fund the size of Franklin's existing Bitcoin ETF would be a mere $3.6 million—negligible against Bitcoin's daily trading volume. Crucially, during bull markets, the fund becomes a programmed, passive *seller* of Bitcoin, potentially creating sustained sell pressure if many similar funds emerge. The strategy leverages investor inertia and automatic enrollment, similar to the success of target-date funds in 401(k) plans. It also uses an offshore Cayman subsidiary for holding Bitcoin and raises a tax complication where investors must pay taxes on dividends they never receive as cash. Although recent U.S. regulatory changes allow crypto in retirement plans, widespread adoption as a default option faces legal hurdles. The core premise remains: the system doesn't need to convince anyone to buy Bitcoin actively; it simply relies on people doing nothing.

marsbit30 хв тому

Trillion-Dollar Pension Fund Entry? Franklin Bitcoin Dividend Reinvestment ETF Comes with a Built-in Selling Pressure Ceiling

marsbit30 хв тому

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Major Bull Loses $15 Billion On June 25th, Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a low of $58,030—its lowest level since October 2024. The sell-off triggered over $1 billion in leveraged liquidations in 24 hours, with longs accounting for $788 million. This marks a more than 53% decline from the October 2025 all-time high of $126,198. A critical factor in the downturn is the weakening position of MicroStrategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. With 847,363 BTC at an average cost of $75,651, the company now faces over $14.6 billion in unrealized losses. Its core financing flywheel—raising capital to buy Bitcoin—is stalling. Its variable-rate preferred shares (STRC), a key fundraising tool, have fallen 25% below their $100 target. This raises doubts about its ability to continue providing steady institutional demand for Bitcoin. Simultaneously, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are experiencing significant outflows, with a single-day net outflow of $469 million on June 24th. This represents the most severe sustained capital flight since their launch. The macroeconomic backdrop remains restrictive, with persistent inflation delaying expected Fed rate cuts. Analysts note a shift in capital allocation, with institutional funds moving away from crypto towards AI infrastructure stocks. Immediate pressure comes from approximately $10 billion worth of Bitcoin options expiring on June 26th, which could increase market volatility. The combined effect of these factors—eroding core demand pillars, macro headwinds, and capital rotation—has decisively broken the $60,000 support level.

Foresight News36 хв тому

Bitcoin Hits 20-Month Low as Largest Bull Suffers $15 Billion Paper Loss

Foresight News36 хв тому

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

The article analyzes whether the STRC (a perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy) presents a buying opportunity after its price fell below its $100 par value to around $80, offering a seemingly high yield of 13-15%. The core argument is that STRC's discount reflects market skepticism about the sustainability of MicroStrategy's capital structure model, not just temporary panic. This model relies on issuing securities (like STRC) to raise funds to buy more Bitcoin, a "flywheel" that works in a bull market. The recent small sale of BTC to fund dividends, while minor, broke the psychological "never sell" anchor and signaled potential strain. Key risks identified are not a traditional Ponzi collapse but a potential breakdown in the financing narrative: 1) If Bitcoin enters a deep bear market, crushing MicroStrategy's stock premium (mNAV), its ability to raise cheap capital weakens. 2) If STRC remains deeply discounted, it signifies permanently higher funding costs. 3) The high cash dividend yield represents a significant ongoing expense. 4) If selling BTC to pay dividends becomes routine, the bullish narrative reverses. The conclusion is that STRC is not a risk-free high-yield asset. It is a high-coupon bet on whether MicroStrategy's BTC treasury financing model can withstand a bear market. Buying it is a wager that the market will continue to believe in and fund this structure at acceptable costs. The current price asks if this cycle's "casualty" might be a BTC treasury company's融资 model itself.

marsbit52 хв тому

STRC Falls Below $80, Can Conservative Investors Still Buy the Dip?

marsbit52 хв тому

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

**Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Names?** In the crypto world, changing a project's name is common—over 16% of projects have done so, including major ones like Polygon (formerly Matic Network). This contrasts sharply with traditional businesses, which fiercely protect brand equity. The core reason is that in crypto, brand loyalty is often weak. Users are frequently investors, airdrop hunters, or yield seekers, not traditional consumers. A name associated with price crashes, hacks, or failed narratives becomes a liability, not an asset. Renaming can be a strategic reset to shed this baggage. Name changes serve as a potent marketing tool. They can signal a genuine pivot in strategy or scope (e.g., EthSign dropping "Eth" as it expanded). However, they are often used to "narrative surf," rebranding to align with hot trends like AI, RWA, or the metaverse (e.g., Elrond → MultiversX). Critically, renaming is also a PR tactic to distance a project from past failures like security breaches (e.g., Anyswap → Multichain). The most significant risk emerges when a name change is coupled with a token migration or swap. This process can allow projects to reset exchange price charts, erase visible historical downtrends, and create an illusion of a fresh start. It often facilitates liquidity resets, where low float can be exploited for pumps. More alarmingly, migrations sometimes mask overhauls to tokenomics, introducing substantial new token supply through "ecosystem funds" or "node rewards," effectively diluting existing holders. The fundamental issue isn't renaming itself, which can be valid for strategic evolution. The problem is when it functions as an escape from history—a way to avoid accountability for past mistakes, failed promises, and poor performance. When a project announces a rebrand, the critical questions are: What tangible new capability or strategy does it represent? Has the tokenomics changed? And what part of its past is it most trying to make users forget?

marsbit58 хв тому

Why Do Crypto Projects Keep Changing Their Names?

marsbit58 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси