Ripple CEO Says Trump’s Pro-Crypto Shift Sparked US Deal Surge

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2025-03-25Востаннє оновлено о 2025-03-25

Анотація

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse confirmed in an interview with FOX Business that financial institutions, particularly banks, are increasing their engagement...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse confirmed in an interview with FOX Business that financial institutions, particularly banks, are increasing their engagement with Ripple and XRP following the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) decision to end its investigation into the company. The development marks a significant turning point for Ripple and potentially the broader digital asset sector in the United States.

Ripple CEO: US Market Reawakens

Garlinghouse, reflecting on Ripple’s multi-year legal battle with the SEC, described the conclusion as an industry-wide win. “Ripple is really amongst the very first crypto companies to get sued by the SEC. We said then, when it started, that the SEC was going to be on the wrong side of the law as well as on the wrong side of history. It took longer than we would have liked… more than $150 million of legal bills, but we’re thrilled with the ultimate outcome. It allows us to really unlock the US market,” Garlinghouse stated.

Ripple, which has traditionally focused on cross-border payments, faced significant headwinds in the US market during the regulatory uncertainty. According to Garlinghouse, about 95% of Ripple’s current customer base consists of non-US financial institutions, including global giants like HSBC and BBVA. However, the conclusion of the SEC investigation is now prompting a noticeable shift in domestic engagement.

“In the six weeks after President Trump was elected, we signed more deals in the United States than we had in the previous six months. These are very innovative technologies. I think they’re going to play out over 10, even 20 years in terms of how they integrate and rewire the financial infrastructure of the United States. That’s across payments, that’s across even the settlement of maybe real estate transactions, securities transactions. […] I think people are underestimating how big that change is,” Garlinghouse disclosed.

The increased interest follows two major executive orders signed by President Trump as part of his pro-crypto agenda. These include initiatives aimed at “strengthening American leadership in digital financial technology” and establishing a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and US digital asset stockpile”. Speaking at the Digital Asset Summit in New York City last week, President Trump told attendees, “You will unleash an explosion of economic growth, and with the dollar-backed stablecoins, you’ll help expand the dominance of the US dollar.”

Garlinghouse called the shift in sentiment a profound “unlock” for US financial institutions. He remarked, “Banks that were really hesitant and nervous about touching crypto technologies or even helping their customers, those banks and those financial institutions are leaning in now, and that’s a big deal—not just for Ripple, but for the whole industry.”

The conversation also turned toward the ongoing regulatory framework discussions in Washington. Garlinghouse praised the efforts of lawmakers such as Senator Cynthia Lummis and Congressman French Hill, who are leading initiatives to clarify how digital assets are classified and regulated under US law. “It can’t just be executive orders. It needs to be codified with legislative efforts by Congress,” he stated, referencing progress on both a stablecoin bill and a market structure bill that could provide the clarity the industry has long sought.

Garlinghouse reiterated that XRP’s legal status has already received validation from the federal judiciary: “XRP was deemed to be a commodity or not a security by a federal judge, which is the opposite of what the SEC had said.” This ruling, coupled with pending legislation, is expected to strengthen Ripple’s position both domestically and internationally.

With trillions of dollars still flowing through outdated global payment systems like SWIFT, Garlinghouse sees the modernization opportunity as massive. “That’s a technology architecture developed 50 years ago. There’s an opportunity to modernize that […] The US is finally unlocked, and I think people are underestimating how big that change is.”

As Ripple moves forward, the company anticipates that regulatory clarity will accelerate the integration of blockchain technologies into mainstream financial services, ranging from payments to securities settlement. Garlinghouse concluded, “That will allow this innovation, allow more job creation, more innovation, and frankly capital formation here in the United States.”

At press time, XRP traded at $2.4295.

XRP price
XRP retests the trend line, 1-day chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image from YouTube, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

Пов'язані матеріали

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the third-largest memory chip maker alongside Samsung and SK Hynix, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion. Founded in 1978 in Boise, Idaho, Micron survived brutal industry cycles while American peers and Japan's memory sector faltered. Its survival is attributed to a dual strategy: leveraging political and legal avenues for critical breathing room, coupled with relentless manufacturing cost control. Historically, Micron sought U.S. government intervention three times. In 1985, it filed an anti-dumping complaint against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which later became its toughest competitor. In 2002, Micron turned "whistleblower" in a DRAM price-fixing investigation, escaping penalties while rivals were fined. In 2017, it sued China's Fujian Jinhua, contributing to its placement on a U.S. entity list, stifling a nascent competitor. However, a major strategic misstep occurred in 2013 with the acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. Integrating Elpida's mobile-DRAM-focused technology diverted resources, causing Micron to miss the critical early decade of development for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)—the high-performance memory essential for AI chips like NVIDIA GPUs. By the time AI demand exploded in 2022, SK Hynix, which launched the first HBM in 2013, held about 85% of the HBM3 market, leaving Micron with roughly 3%. Micron now faces a triple squeeze. In the high-end HBM market, it lags significantly behind SK Hynix and Samsung. In the mid-to-low end DRAM market, it faces aggressive price competition from China's CXMT. Furthermore, a 2023 Chinese cybersecurity ban on its products slashed its revenue from China, a once-core market, from over 10% to just 7.1% by FY2025, causing it to exit China's data center server business. Beneath its political maneuvering lies Micron's core strength: exceptional manufacturing efficiency and cost control. Decades of engineering have yielded DRAM chips with a smaller cell area than rivals, meaning more chips per wafer and lower unit costs. This efficiency, not subsidies, has allowed it to withstand price wars. While political leverage bought time, Micron is now paying a "time debt" in the HBM race. It is racing to ramp up HBM3E production and develop HBM4, but catching up to competitors who started a decade earlier is a monumental challenge. Its future hinges on whether its expertise in cost control and political strategy can compensate for the lost time in a technology race where early-mover advantage is decisive.

链捕手21 хв тому

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

链捕手21 хв тому

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

AMD's new research challenges the conventional understanding of FP4 training instability. While reducing precision from FP8 to FP4 promises doubled computational throughput and is supported by new hardware like NVIDIA Blackwell and AMD MI350 series, training large language models natively with FP4 has been notoriously unstable, often attributed to insufficient stochasticity. The paper "Pretraining large language models with MXFP4 on Native FP4 Hardware" demonstrates successful end-to-end FP4 pre-training of Llama 3.1-8B on AMD MI355X GPUs using the MXFP4 format, achieving a 9-10% overall speedup over FP8. Crucially, it identifies the root cause of instability: not randomness, but the accumulation of *structural micro-scaling errors* along the sensitive weight gradient (Wgrad) path. Through controlled experiments, researchers found that quantizing the Wgrad operation to FP4 caused significant convergence degradation. Counterintuitively, common stochasticity-based mitigation techniques like stochastic rounding and randomized Hadamard transforms worsened performance. In contrast, applying a *deterministic* Hadamard transform successfully stabilized training by ensuring consistent error patterns, reducing the extra token cost from 26-27% to just 8-9%. This work has significant implications: 1) It provides a clear diagnostic for low-precision training instability, steering focus towards structural errors. 2) It pushes FP4 from a primarily inference-focused format into the realm of viable training. 3) It leverages the open OCP Microscaling (MX) standard, promoting cross-vendor compatibility. The research marks a critical step towards more economical large model training by further pushing the boundaries of low-precision computation.

marsbit40 хв тому

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

marsbit40 хв тому

Will ONDO's 'Tokenization Narrative' Change After Its CEO's Unexpected Passing?

Ondo Finance founder and CEO Nathan Allman has passed away unexpectedly. Allman, a Brown University graduate with a background in private credit and Goldman Sachs' digital asset team, was a key architect of Ondo's pivot from DeFi structured yield products to becoming a leading Real-World Asset (RWA) protocol. He drove the strategy to tokenize traditional financial assets like US Treasuries (OUSG), yield-generating dollar assets (USDY), and US stocks/ETFs (Ondo Global Markets) for on-chain accessibility. The company announced that President Ian De Bode, a former McKinsey partner with a strong institutional strategy and operations background, will succeed Allman as CEO. While Allman's sudden departure presents a near-term challenge, testing market confidence and Ondo's continuity, the project is seen as more than a founder-driven narrative. It has an established product suite and a management team with deep traditional finance experience. The long-term impact hinges on the new leadership's ability to execute. De Bode's expertise in compliance, distribution, and institutional partnerships aligns with RWA's next phase of scaling infrastructure. The core question is whether Ondo can maintain its product momentum and institutional relationships. Ondo's native ONDO token represents governance and RWA narrative value, not direct revenue from the underlying assets. Its future as a "top tokenization play" will depend on the team's continued delivery of product growth, asset scale, and real-world demand, moving beyond the initial emotional shock.

marsbit1 год тому

Will ONDO's 'Tokenization Narrative' Change After Its CEO's Unexpected Passing?

marsbit1 год тому

Bankless Co-founder's Confession on Selling Off ETH: Ethereum Did the Right Thing, but 'ETH as Money' Has No Future

Bankless co-founder David Hoffman recently sold his remaining ETH holdings, sparking debate within the Ethereum community. In a detailed explanation, Hoffman clarifies that his decision was not based on bearish sentiment towards Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about, but rather on the conclusion that the "ETH is Money" narrative has largely run its course. Hoffman argues that for ETH to achieve its envisioned status as global money, Ethereum needed to execute flawlessly across multiple layers—governance, technology, and market dominance—in a highly coordinated manner. He acknowledges Ethereum's significant successes and current justified valuation but suggests the window for a major revaluation based on this monetary narrative is closing. The post examines several challenges: the strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and native token value; the perceived failure of the "strong version" of crypto (user-owned, egalitarian systems) versus the rise of a "weak version" (efficient ledger technology for traditional finance); and the possibility that ETH's momentum as money was uniquely tied to the distorted conditions of the 2020-2021 period. Crucially, Hoffman highlights a structural tension: Ethereum is architected as a "giver, not a taker," providing critical infrastructure like secure block space and tokenization at cost. This ethos benefits the broader ecosystem (applications, L2s) but doesn't prioritize extracting maximum value for ETH itself. The "ETH is Money" thesis required Ethereum to win a war of overwhelming market dominance—a war its design philosophy refuses to explicitly fight. Therefore, while he sees continued immense success for the Ethereum network and its ecosystem (following a "fat application" theory where value accrues to apps and L2s), Hoffman finds it increasingly difficult to foresee a structural upward revaluation for the ETH asset based on the monetary narrative. His capital reallocation reflects a belief that this particular investment thesis has played out.

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Bankless Co-founder's Confession on Selling Off ETH: Ethereum Did the Right Thing, but 'ETH as Money' Has No Future

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片