DEXX 独家内幕:老板 94 年生,只有初中学历?

coinvoiceОпубліковано о 2024-11-18Востаннє оновлено о 2024-11-18

作者:加密情报橘

 

昨晚说什么来着?

正经人,谁他妈花钱买币啊?

前后有十个小时吗?这dexx不就正儿八经做给你看了么。

截止到目前大家丢的一个多亿美金的币,人家可不是花钱买的吧。

昨天文章里是不是又神预言了?再来一起复习一遍:

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

然后今天早晨一起来,一大帮韭菜在哭爹喊娘,说要刀了dexx的老板。

刀个毛啊,人家都不在国内了。

其实这个项目,今年九月份的时候已经有人联系过橘座了,从产品定位层面来说,其实挺好的。

但谁知道他是把用户的私钥明文储存的啊。

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

现在这个情况就难说了。

你说你是非托管钱包,但你的私钥都是明文的,一点加密都没有。

你说是黑客攻击的,但你怎么那个黑客不是你自己?

所以到目前为止,dexx这边就是黄泥巴掉到裤裆里,不是屎也是屎了。

然后一场针对dexx的开盒行动开始了,从上午到下午,扒出来的信息是越来越细了。

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

下午橘座不是也打听了一下他的信息么,确实拿到了一些比较细致的资料,包括他的身份信息,护照信息等等。

发一张全网独一份的图吧,你敢想吗?

捅出这么大篓子的楼老板,居然只是94年生人,初中学历。

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

随着打听的深入,也听知情人讲了一些dexx数据:

每天成交额超过5000万,每天利润超过30万刀。

至于是黑客攻击还是监守自盗,橘座也懒得去做判断了,让子弹飞一会。

不过金额确实没有网友传的那么离谱,5亿美金,慢雾统计了500多人,金额是1300万美金,如果全部算上,1个多亿美金差不多。

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

其实在9月份的时候,跟dexx走的比较近的人也找过橘座,我们聊的还比较深,当时橘座还从产品角度给了他们一些建议,包括一些风险提示。

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

后面的事情你们也知道了,橘座从来没在任何渠道推过dexx,甚至都没聊起过,所以这次针对于kol的维权,也没我什么事。

不是因为橘座运气好躲过一劫,而是橘座早就知道会发生这样的事情。

这个风险是摆在明面上的,而今日dexx危机的爆发方式,又不幸被橘座言中了。

当时橘座并不知道他们的技术逻辑,所以给他们建议要做好风险规避,且最好是肉身出海。

后来他还真是在前段时间去了日本。

腹黑一点的想法是:如果这次真的是黑客行为,你怎么知道不是某家看他们不顺眼的交易所点的炮呢?

橘座还是那句话,到底是监守自盗还是黑客攻击,我不去下判断,也不去带节奏,静静吃瓜就好。

但有一点是可以确定的,roy这哥们完犊子了。

首先,用户方面肯定不会放过他,因为他是明面上的最终兜底人(虽然也有人说他只是个站台的),dexx的所有问题都必须由他来做最后的责任人,那么多用户的钱丢了,谁能放得过他?

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

第二,现在很多双眼睛都在盯着他呢,不管是国内还是国外的。

下午跟一个朋友聊这个事情的时候,朋友说他来错地方了,国内不管怎样人身安全还是有保障的,泰国这边的警察可是黑的很,他能不能顺利出境都是个问题。

光是今天下午,橘座就收到了几个邀约,让我一起干他一炮。

但橘座想想还是算了,现在这么多人盯着,我们还是不搅和了吧。

DEXX独家内幕:老板只是94年初中学历?

这一幕像极了前几年bhx王小彬个事情,当时王小彬也说是被黑客攻击,但实际上就是监守自盗,后来闹了挺大动静,王小彬也被反复撸了很多回,不知道现在什么情况。

正是因为有王小彬的前车之鉴,所以橘座才说roy这辈子完犊子了。

所有人看他,都觉得他是个兜里有1.6亿美金行走的取款机。

哎,币圈这个江湖,水可深得很呐。

橘座这种小卡拉米,可搅不动浑水咯。

还是老老实实做我的资产找回业务吧,赚点零花钱就够了。


声明:本内容为作者独立观点,不代表 CoinVoice 立场,且不构成投资建议,请谨慎对待,如需报道或加入交流群,请联系微信:VOICE-V。

来源:加密情报橘

Пов'язані матеріали

Are the Frantic Acquisitions of Crypto Companies by Giants Good or Bad?

In a bear market, giants are actively acquiring crypto companies. Recent months have seen at least five major deals: Samsung Securities bought a 2% stake in Upbit operator Dunamu; Robinhood acquired WonderFi for $180 million to enter the Canadian market; Figure purchased Kiavi for $717 million to expand into on-chain real estate credit; Franklin Templeton bought 250Digital to launch Franklin Crypto; and Blockworks acquired data platform Messari at a steep discount—over 90% less than its 2022 $300 million valuation. These moves highlight a strategic shift. Cash-rich giants are consolidating resources at low cost, targeting companies with established compliance frameworks to navigate tightening global regulations. Acquisitions like WonderFi and the Upbit stake provide immediate market access and licensed user bases. Figure's deal signals real-world asset (RWA) tokenization moving from concept to large-scale implementation, with Kiavi's $7+ billion annual transaction volume being integrated into on-chain capital markets. Franklin Crypto's launch targets institutional investors like pension funds, offering them tailored, compliant crypto strategies. For these strategic players, bear markets present an ideal entry point: valuations are depressed, speculative noise is minimized, and they can acquire robust technology and compliance infrastructure at a fraction of the cost. This acquisition wave marks a transitional phase for crypto—from a wild frontier toward an institutional, regulated financial system. Giants are positioning themselves to capture future growth when macroeconomic conditions and liquidity improve, leaving latecomers behind.

marsbit1 год тому

Are the Frantic Acquisitions of Crypto Companies by Giants Good or Bad?

marsbit1 год тому

In the MiCA Era, Europe's New Cryptography Landscape: Why is Germany Taking Center Stage?

With MiCA's transitional arrangements concluding, Europe's crypto industry has undergone a regulatory consolidation. Post-MiCA, platforms must secure CASP authorization to operate compliantly within the EU. As of July 1st, only about 12% of crypto firms have received authorization, with Germany emerging as a key player, holding 57 authorizations (roughly 23% of the EU total). This positions Germany as a primary compliance gateway to the EU's unified market. Germany's advantage stems from its established, function-based regulatory framework, which integrated crypto activities into existing banking, securities, and payment systems pre-MiCA. This allowed a smoother transition and attracted both domestic platforms (like Bitcoin.de, BISON) and international ones (like Coinbase Germany). A distinctive trend is German banks becoming direct retail entry points for crypto services. Examples include DZ Bank integrating "meinKrypto" into its VR Banking App and the Sparkassen savings bank network planning to offer crypto trading via DekaBank. This mainstreams crypto access for ordinary users. Beyond trading, Germany is evolving into a digital asset infrastructure hub. Deutsche Börse Group's Clearstream is developing a next-generation platform for issuing, settling, and servicing both traditional and tokenized securities. Furthermore, German banks like DekaBank and DZ Bank are key participants in the Qivalis project, a European initiative for a regulated euro stablecoin, positioning Germany at the intersection of critical future capabilities like custody, settlement, and cross-border services.

marsbit2 год тому

In the MiCA Era, Europe's New Cryptography Landscape: Why is Germany Taking Center Stage?

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片