日报 | Grass 公布空投计划,将向符合资格的用户分配 1 亿枚 GRASS;Paradigm 联创:稳定币是 Crypto 行业的下一个杀手级应用

链捕手Опубліковано о 2024-10-22Востаннє оновлено о 2024-10-22

整理:栾鹏,ChainCatcher

 

重要资讯:

“过去24小时都发生了哪些重要事件”

Paradigm 联创:稳定币是 Crypto 行业的下一个杀手级应用

加密投资机构 Paradigm 联合创始人 Matt Huang 在社交媒体发文表示,“稳定币是 Crypto 行业的下一个杀手级应用——对于加密货币行业的每个人来说都是显而易见的,但对于外界来说却不那么明显。祝贺 Stripe 和 Bridge。”

早前,ChainCatcher 报道,支付公司 Stripe 已以 11 亿美元收购稳定币平台 Bridge,为加密货币领域最大收购。

Grass 公布空投计划,将向符合资格的用户分配 1 亿枚 GRASS

Grass 基金会在 X 公布空投计划,将向符合资格的用户分配 1 亿枚 GRASS,占总供应量的 10%。

  •  9% 给在第一阶段(网络快照)获得 Grass Points 的用户
  • 0.5% 给 GigaBuds NFT 持有者
  • 0.5% 授予安装桌面节点或 Saga 应用程序的用户。

为了确保公平并防止网络滥用,Grass 用强大的系统来识别网络滥用者。基于多种技术对用户进行过滤,包括用于识别可疑引用树的 Graph ML、设备指纹、类似的 IP 子网等。

Infinex 创始人:若特朗普在 2017 年推出 WLFI 能筹集到 10 亿美元

Infinex 创始人 Kain Warwick 表示,特朗普相关的 World Liberty Financial 项目销售平淡原因在于“市场风向已经转变”,不再是 ICO 式的代币融资,而是转向了 meme 币。

Warwick 指出:“如果特朗普在 2017 年推出 World Liberty Financial……这项目能筹集到 10 亿美元。加密原住民与特朗普核心支持者之间的重叠可能没有想象中那么大,这从需求不足中可见一斑。”

其补充说,这次销售的代币锁定期为一年,这可能是其表现不佳的部分原因,因为在目前的 Memecoin 市场狂热期,持有代币的时间通常比一年短得多,有时只有几个小时。

矿企 Ionic Digital 重启 IPO 计划,BTC 持仓超 1.35 亿美元

矿企 Ionic Digital 在任命 BDO USA 为其新审计师后,重新启动了 IPO 的计划。截至 2024 年 9 月 30 日,其持有 2102.29 枚 BTC,价值 1.353 亿美元。

此外,Ionic Digital 宣布在其德克萨斯州沃德县的设施启用第二栋建筑,将总负载能力提升到 140 兆瓦。新设施中容纳了 15,552 台比特币矿机。

Borderless Capital 推出 5000 万美元 LATAM 基金,推动拉丁美洲的 Web3创新

Borderless Capital 已推出一支规模达到 5000 万美元的 LATAM 基金,旨在推动拉丁美洲的 Web3 创新。该基金专注于拉丁美洲的 Web3 项目,以挖掘拉丁美洲地区采用区块链的独特机会以及当地创新解决全球挑战的潜力。

据悉,Avalanche 基金会财务和投资主管 Matias A. 也加入了该基金。

CFTC 主席:美国加密货币监管停滞不前,CFTC 面临“束缚”

据 Cointelegraph 报道,CFTC 主席罗斯廷-贝赫纳姆(Rostin Behnam)声称,随着美国加密货币监管谈判陷入僵局,该机构面临“束缚”。

Rostin Behnam 表示通过立法框架监管数字资产行业的努力 “迄今为止停滞不前”。不过,他仍然相信,新一届国会和总统能够取得更多进展。

Rostin Behnam表示:“我并不认为今年年底一定会发生什么,但我认为,这次选举对数字资产和技术产生了独特的影响。”其补充道,如果没有任何立法,该机构在“监管”加密货币市场方面“真的受到束缚”,这将使投资者“处于危险之中”。 

Matrixport:山寨币热潮尚未到来,散户投资者仍未大规模入场

Matrixport 发布研报称,比特币的市场主导率持续攀升,现已达到 58%,显示山寨币热潮尚未到来。虽然市面上已有超过 2 万种加密货币,但市场关注点依然高度集中在比特币。比特币的主导地位表明,ETF 资金流入对山寨币的带动作用不明显,同时暗示散户投资者仍然没有大规模入场。

比特币交易量从 2023 年的 100 亿至 200 亿美元,翻倍至 200 亿至 400 亿美元,进一步凸显了比特币影响力的增强。从风险调整的角度看,比特币仍是当前加密市场中最具吸引力的交易之一。

币安理财、一键买币、闪兑、杠杆、合约上线 Scroll(SCR)

据币安公告,Scroll(SCR)将全面上线币安多个产品和服务。SCR 保本赚币活期产品将于 10 月 22 日 17:00(东八区时间)开放申购;用户自 10 月 23 日 18:00 起,可通过信用卡、Google Pay、Apple Pay 等方式购买 SCR,或使用钱包余额进行买卖。同时,SCR 现货上线后一小时内可在闪兑平台免手续费兑换成 BTC、USDT 等资产。

此外,币安将于 10 月 22 日 19:00新增 SCR 杠杆交易对,并支持全仓和逐仓模式。同日 18:00,还将上线 SCR 1-75 倍 U 本位永续合约。

DAO 资金管理解决方案供应商 Karpatkey 完成 700 万美元融资,Wintermute Ventures 等参投

据 The Block 报道,为 DAO 提供链上资金管理解决方案的供应商 Karpatkey 宣布完成一轮 700 万美元的融资。本轮投资者包括 AppWorks Ventures 和 Wintermute Ventures,以及一批知名天使投资人,例如 ConsenSys 的 Joe Lubin、Avara 的 Stani Kuchelov 和 Balancer Labs 的 Fernando Martinelli 等。

据悉,Karpatkey 是一种非托管链上资产管理基础设施,为领先的 DAO 提供金融服务。新获得的资金将专门用于将 karpatkey 的服务范围扩展到更多的 DAO,并加速其向传统金融机构的拓展。

QCP Capital:短期隐含波动率在选举日到期时达到峰值,加密市场仍偏向看涨

新加坡加密投资机构 QCP Capital 发文称,短期隐含波动率在选举日到期时达到峰值,较上一到期日扩大了 10 个波动点,且偏斜度偏向看涨期权而非看跌期权,尽管比特币较其历史最高点低了约 8%。与此同时,股市呈现出不同的景象

标普500 指数创下历史新高,其中有 20% 的公司即将公布财报。期权市场则偏向看跌保护,预计在选举次日即 11 月 6 日,该指数可能波动 1.8%。股市与加密货币的相关性达到了历史高位的 0.83。鉴于其均值回归的趋势和期权市场定位的差异,这可能预示着转折点的到来。

选举为股市创造了一个零和博弈的场景,行业赢家将取决于选举结果。相比之下,两位美国总统候选人都比上一届政府更加支持加密货币,因此股市的任何疲软都可能促使资本重新分配到加密货币领域。

“过去24小时有哪些值得阅读的精彩文章”

SKY 要改回 Maker 了?品牌重塑怎么就这么难?

9 月 18 日,老牌 DeFi 龙头 Maker 正式完成了品牌升级与重塑,在更名为 Sky 的同时还启动了 “从 MKR 到 SKY”、“从 DAI 到 USDS”的代币迁移。

时隔一个多月,或是由于原品牌 Maker 早已深入人心,原代币 MKR 及 DAI 也早已累积了较为广泛的应用场景,该协议向新品牌及新代币的迁移进程似乎并不太顺利。

Dune 数据显示,截至发文约有 9 亿枚 DAI 已完成向 USDS 的迁移,仅占当前 DAI 总供应量(58 亿枚)的约 15.5%;约有 91880 枚 MKR 已完成向 SKY 的迁移,仅占当前 MKR 流通供应量(868478 枚)的 10.6%。

AI 币也有 Cult 文化?如何理解 AI 币的本质

AGI 的崛起将改变人类与货币的关系,塑造新的经济信仰体系,强调忠诚与信仰的重要性。部分加密货币热衷者认为 AI 代币不仅是货币形式,更是连接未来的桥梁。

复盘 Apechain 上线大戏:MEME、拉盘、自动收益,上演主网上线营销组合拳

一天半涨了135%,APE再一次回到加密主流视野当中,但这次却靠的是MEME。

10月20日4点27分,Bored Ape Yacht Club 官方推特发布了一条消息,宣布Apechain主网已经正式上线,十多分钟后,市场开始对这个新的L3作出回应,Apechain治理代币APE开始拉升。另一边,随着生态内一键发币平台Ape Express上CURTIS代币创建并开始拉升,APE的价格也同步上涨。截至10月21日,APE的价格从0.748一路涨至最高1.758,最大上涨幅度超过135%。

不少人惊呼,那个NFT的王者换了一个方式回来了,也有人并不看好,认为这只是一次市场短暂的盲目刺激,Apechain的命运仍未可知。无论接下来发展如何,从过去2天发生的事情来看,Apechain确实再一次用出色的运营能力,向世人展现了一出精彩的Web3经典营销战。

DeFi 衍生品主流玩法对比:真实资产支持 VS 合成资产交易

本文中将讨论硬流动性支持模型和合成模型。

价格暴跌 70%:AI 算力租赁泡沫是如何破灭的?

AI 算力成本下降,将激发初创公司利用低成本资源进行创新的热潮。

去年由于 AI 算力供应紧张,H100 的租赁价格高达每小时 8 美元,但现在市场上算力供应过剩,价格降到了每小时 2 美元以下。这是由于一些公司在早期签署了算力租赁合同,为了不让过剩的算力浪费,于是开始转售其预留的计算资源,而市场大多选择使用开源模型,导致新模型的需求减少。现在,市场上 H100 的供应量远超需求,因此租用 H100 比购买更划算,投资购买新的 H100 已不再具有收益。

Пов'язані матеріали

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

Collateral Dollars: How Does a "Second Layer of Dollars" Form on Top of Stablecoins? Most assume stablecoins replicate Eurodollar functions, expanding the offshore dollar system. However, stablecoins primarily replace specific functions like operational dollar balances for settlement. They do not inherently create new dollar credit; they substitute existing claims. The key question is: what happens when financial intermediaries use stablecoins as collateral to create a new layer of dollar-denominated claims? This "collateral dollar" channel operates through secured lending, not direct money creation. A money-like event only occurs when a liability issued against the controlled stablecoin is funded, rolled over, or accepted at near-par value by another balance sheet. The discount (haircut) prices the gap between "effective control over the token" and "reliable convertibility to bank dollars." Elasticity stems not from the stablecoin itself but from the liability issued against it and the willingness of third-party balance sheets to treat that liability as a near-par asset. Compared to the traditional Eurodollar system—where elasticity originates from bank deposit creation—the stablecoin collateral chain is structurally different. Eurodollar deposits are credit-expansive from inception. Stablecoins are initially substitutive; elasticity emerges later if an intermediary's liability against them gains monetary acceptance. Stablecoins disrupt specific tiers of the offshore dollar system, mainly replacing operational settlement balances. They do not replace the need for full dollar balance-sheet capacity (credit lines, hedging, maturity transformation). For systemic impact, the second-layer liability must pass three tests: transferability, funding capacity, and monetary acceptance (being fundable or held at par by others). Pressure transmission also differs. In the Eurodollar system, stress moves up a hierarchy of claims. In a stablecoin collateral chain, the second-layer liability can lose its money-like status well before the underlying stablecoin faces a run, often triggered by haircut increases and margin calls that create a dynamic spiral of falling token prices and rising discounts. In conclusion, the "collateral dollar" is not the stablecoin itself. It is the second-layer liability issued against a controlled token balance that is willing to be funded and maintained at near-par value. Its existence depends on that liability surviving the leap from "token liquidity" to "bank dollar liquidity."

marsbit5 хв тому

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

marsbit5 хв тому

Collateral Dollars: How the 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Takes Shape?

"Collateralized Dollars: How a 'Second Layer of Dollars' Forms on Top of Stablecoins" Most assume stablecoins replicate Eurodollars and expand the offshore dollar system, but this is not accurate. Stablecoins primarily replace certain functions within the existing system, especially operational dollar balances for daily settlement. The critical question is what happens when financial intermediaries create a new layer of dollar claims *on top of* stablecoins. This article explains how this new collateralized funding channel works. Stablecoins introduce tokenized private dollar claims. Even if issuers and reserves are within the US legal perimeter, their circulation and use as collateral can become economically "offshore." Enforceable control over collateral opens a secured credit channel but does not itself create a monetary claim. A true monetary event occurs only when another balance sheet funds, rolls over, or accepts a liability issued against the controlled token at near-par value. The discount prices the gap between "effective control over the token" and "reliable convertibility into bank dollars." Elasticity comes from the balance sheet issuing the liability against the token and from third-party willingness to treat that liability as a near-par asset. Collateralized Dollars are not the stablecoins themselves; they are the second-layer liability that another balance sheet is willing to issue, fund, and maintain at near-par against a controlled token balance. The Eurodollar system is a hierarchy of claims, with elasticity originating in expandable bank liabilities. In contrast, the stablecoin collateral chain starts with a tokenized asset. It gains systemic significance only when an intermediary's liability against that token is treated as money-like by other balance sheets. Key determining factors include: who has effective control, the legal/operational path to bank dollars, and whether the resulting claim can still be financed near-par under stress. Pressure in this new channel manifests differently. The upper-layer (intermediary) claim fails first, losing its money-like status, potentially while the underlying stablecoin remains solvent. Increased haircuts and forced sales can create a destructive feedback loop, widening the very gap the discount measures. In conclusion, the Eurodollar analogy has limits. Reserve quality supports the underlying token's solvency, but the leverage, credit, and liabilities built atop it face a separate test. Collateral eligibility is not monetary acceptance. Only when a claim built on stablecoins survives the leap from "token liquidity" to "bank dollar liquidity" do Collateralized Dollars truly exist.

链捕手11 хв тому

Collateral Dollars: How the 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Takes Shape?

链捕手11 хв тому

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25 Billion Cap: MicroStrategy's Three-Pronged Bitcoin Sale Pools Hide Massive Selling Pressure

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25B Cap: Strategy's Three-Tier Bitcoin Sales Plan Hides Massive Potential Selling Pressure Strategy recently sold 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to fund a dividend and replenish its dollar reserve, while claiming its $1.25B "reserve build" capacity remains fully available. This highlights a key nuance: the widely cited $1.25B limit applies only to sales for "Building" the reserve. Strategy's broader capital framework, however, allows Bitcoin sales for three primary purposes, each with different scales: 1. **Building the Reserve:** Selling BTC to raise up to $1.25B for the reserve. 2. **Covering Priority Share Expenses:** Selling BTC to pay dividends/interest or to replenish the reserve after such payments are made from it (no specified limit). 3. **Share Repurchase Funding:** Selling BTC to fund up to $1B each in convertible note and common stock repurchases (totaling $2B potential). Combined, just the capped "Build" and "Repurchase" channels could facilitate over $3B in Bitcoin sales, excluding the uncapped "Cover Expenses" channel. The accounting distinction between "Building" (adding cash before a payout) and "Replenishing" (adding cash after a payout) is operationally blurry but allows sales like the recent $216M transaction without touching the $1.25B "Build" quota. This gives Strategy significant flexibility. The move signifies a strategic shift: Strategy is transforming from a simple Bitcoin accumulator into an active capital manager, akin to a hedge fund. Bitcoin is now a financial lever to balance pressures between common stock, convertible notes, dollar reserves, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates inherent tensions—actions benefiting one part of the capital structure may harm another. Investors must understand that the potential Bitcoin sales are far greater than the surface-level $1.25B figure. Strategy has become a complex financial entity where every term in its disclosures matters. Betting on it now is a wager on its active capital management skill to navigate these internal contradictions without a systemic failure.

Foresight News18 хв тому

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25 Billion Cap: MicroStrategy's Three-Pronged Bitcoin Sale Pools Hide Massive Selling Pressure

Foresight News18 хв тому

When the Largest BTC Buyer Becomes a Seller, Who's Buying After MicroStrategy Sells 3,588 Bitcoin?

MicroStrategy, once the largest corporate buyer of Bitcoin, sold 3,588 BTC for approximately $216 million to fund its preferred stock dividends, marking a significant shift from buyer to seller. This move occurred after its market-to-NAV premium vanished, breaking its "print stock to buy Bitcoin" financial model. A roundtable discussion featuring Austin Campbell, Ram Ahluwalia, and Chris Perkins analyzed the implications. They noted that MicroStrategy's dominance has become a narrative bottleneck for the broader crypto market, with some speculating that Bitcoin's price might only surge significantly after the company's influence wanes. The conversation expanded to examine the capital structure conflict between traditional equity and crypto tokens, arguing that most current tokens will fail as they don't fit neatly into existing debt/equity frameworks. A "stablecoin war" was identified as a major trend, with entities like Tether, Robinhood, and the OUSD alliance competing. Tether's decision to abandon the European MiCA market highlights strategic divergences. The panelists argued that bank-issued stablecoins could revolutionize global finance by allowing US banks to capture net interest margins from international transactions, potentially making JPMorgan the first trillion-dollar bank. They concluded that while capital is currently being siphoned by AI/semiconductors, markets will eventually refocus on fundamentals and cash flow, which could benefit cryptocurrencies with real utility.

marsbit25 хв тому

When the Largest BTC Buyer Becomes a Seller, Who's Buying After MicroStrategy Sells 3,588 Bitcoin?

marsbit25 хв тому

Bitcoin’s path to $80K may hinge on THIS hidden trend

Bitcoin's potential path toward $80,000 is influenced by conflicting market signals. Data shows the Coinbase Bitcoin Premium Index has recorded its longest-ever streak of consecutive negative premiums, indicating muted institutional demand or net selling from U.S. institutions. While such a trend often signals short-term weakness, it doesn't necessarily forecast a long-term bear market. Additionally, a bearish crossover occurred in Bitcoin's Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL), with its short-term average falling below the longer-term average, suggesting declining investor profitability and waning market momentum. Historically, major bear market bottoms saw the 100-day NUPL drop below zero, but this cycle it remains positive, implying either an unprecedented bottom or a further decline is needed. Currently trading around $63,148, Bitcoin has seen weekly gains but remains below its May peak. Technical indicators present a mixed picture: the MACD shows bullish momentum, while the RSI signals bearish pressure. A positive development is the return of inflows to Bitcoin ETFs after eight weeks of outflows. Analysts hold divergent views; some highlight a key liquidity zone between $48,000-$50,000 where a market bottom could form, while others maintain a more optimistic long-term outlook. Ultimately, while some bullish signs exist, a strong push from institutional investors appears crucial for Bitcoin to challenge the $80,000 level.

ambcrypto1 год тому

Bitcoin’s path to $80K may hinge on THIS hidden trend

ambcrypto1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片