盘点ETHGlobal旧金山黑客松决赛10个入围项目

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-10-22Востаннє оновлено о 2024-10-22

Анотація

入围决赛的项目涉及游戏、版权保护等领域,本文带你详览这10个项目。

原文作者:ETHGlobal

原文编译:Felix, PANews

10 月 21 日,ETHGlobal 公布入围 ETHGlobal 旧金山黑客松决赛项目,本次竞赛共有 223 个项目参赛,最终 10 个项目脱颖而出,包括 PumpRoyale、VVLDrizzy 和 IP Infinity 等,涉及游戏、版权保护等领域。

本文带你详览这 10 个项目。

PumpRoyale

PumpRoyale 让用户在全球健身挑战中投入 USDC,完成活动,并从失败者池中赢得奖励。

在 PumpRoyale 中,全球用户可以在定期举办的全球比赛中投入任意数量的 USDC。比赛期间,系统会随机提示用户在提示后的 10 分钟内记录自己完成一项基本健身活动的情况。在规定时间内成功完成体育活动的人将获得其押金,而未完成的人将失去押金,这将形成一个失败者池。每场比赛结束后,系统都会随机抽取少数完成健身活动的人,并将获得失败者池的分配。

盘点ETHGlobal旧金山黑客松决赛10个入围项目

VVLDrizzy

VVLDrizzy 让创作者可以铸造、加水印和授权病毒式视频,同时赚取收入。媒体机构可以轻松授权经过验证的内容。由 Story Protocol 和 Walrus 提供支持。

VVLDrizzy(病毒式视频授权商)旨在让内容创作者和媒体机构能够轻松获得报酬或支付视频内容授权费用,帮助弥合传统媒体机构在 Web3 采用方面的差距。

盘点ETHGlobal旧金山黑客松决赛10个入围项目

IP Infinity

IP Infinity 将 NFT 转变为具有统计数据的游戏对象,并使用虚幻引擎和 AI 驱动的分类将它们集成到程序生成的世界中。

IP-Landers 是使用 AI 模型、区块链集成和游戏开发工具构建。Meta 的 Llama 3.2 视觉模型分析 NFT 图像,生成由 DeBERTa 零样本分类模型分类的文本描述,将它们分类为不同类型的对象。虚幻引擎为游戏提供动力,以程序生成的景观和地牢为特色,带来动态体验。Story Protocol 的平台允许协作创造,而不会产生 IP 纠纷。

OmiSwap

OmiSwap 使用 AI 可穿戴设备实现语音激活的区块链交易,支持跨链传输和无 gas USDC 发送,实现无缝加密交互。

该平台利用由 OpenAI 的 GPT 模型提供支持的高级 AI 来解释自然语言命令。该系统支持多个区块链网络,包括 Base、Polygon、Arbitrum 和以太坊。OmiSwap 使用 Coinbase CDP(加密开发平台)SDK 为不同区块链网络上的用户创建和管理钱包。OmiSwap 支持两种主要类型的交易:向平台上的其他用户转移加密货币(ETH 或 USDC),以及在 Base 网络上在 ETH 和 USDC 之间进行货币互换。

HelloACAI

HelloACAI 是基于代理的链上协作 AI 基础设施。

当前的通用 AI 有助于提出建议,但实际上并不能节省执行时间。AI 缺乏根据请求采取适当行动的能力。多个 AI 代理专注于研究、与网站交互、API、日历、付款等功能。当 AI 协作时,如何确保良好的互动?HelloACAI 通过智能合约做到这一点。与 AI 代理之间的交互受这些合约的约束。HelloACAI 还为通过智能合约构建的 AI 代理提供了注册表。

盘点ETHGlobal旧金山黑客松决赛10个入围项目

DAOsaster

DAOsaster 是一个去中心化的灾难响应系统,使用人工智能代理、无人机和区块链进行自主检测和协调,而不依赖于传统基础设施。

项目的初始阶段涉及使用无人机从本地和全球代理收集数据,无人机会调查并收集受灾地区的关键信息。这些数据(包括高分辨率视频文件和照片)存储在 Walrus 上。

为了将这些有价值的内容货币化并分发,利用 Story Protocol,使新闻记者等实体能够铸造和使用这些数据。通过此过程产生的任何利润都会汇回 DAO 合约,AI 代理会使用该合约来管理供应链。当灾难发生时,AI 代理会通过 SKALE 链发起彼此之间的通信,自主分配角色和协调行动。他们利用 Graph 协议快速查询和处理数据,确保响应迅速且高效的操作。

为了增强由 AI 代理管理的 DAO 的流动性和资金,用户可以将任何 AI 资产(从无人机到全能凝胶设备)代币化,从而为社区资源做出贡献。

Chain Waves

Chain Waves 允许用户在区块链上为音频文件添加水印并保护其安全,从而确保为创作者提供所有权证明、版税跟踪和自动争议解决。

工作原理:

  • 铸造您的 IP:上传内容并将其铸造为 NFT。

  • 收取版税:根据您设置的条款,在使用您的 IP 时自动收到版税。

  • 争议解决:如果发现未经授权的使用,请启动由具有法律约束力的合同支持的争议程序。

  • 使用 IP 作为贷款抵押品

主要优势:

  • 法律支持:Story Protocol 的智能合约为知识产权提供法律基础。

  • 透明跟踪:所有使用和版税交易都记录在区块链上,以实现完全透明。

  • 高效的争议处理:利用争议系统快速处理和解决知识产权侵权问题。

盘点ETHGlobal旧金山黑客松决赛10个入围项目

BuildBlocks

BuildBlocks 创建了拖放式(drag-and-drop)智能合约组件,任何人都可以在 Rootstock 上开发、编译和部署经过审计的合约,从而使 Web3 开发变得简单而安全。

BuildBlocks 使用标准的 NextJS、Tailwind 堆栈构建,还使用了可注入钱包、Rootstock 部署和测试网络、用于自动 Solidity 合约编译的 SolC 编译器,以及 SIDAI 的 RAG 管道生成服务。

盘点ETHGlobal旧金山黑客松决赛10个入围项目

Uni V4 Backtester

Uni V4 Backtester 是一个机构级的 Uni V4 回测器,可以准确地重播 Uni V3 事件(Swap、Mint、Burn),以查看假定头寸在一段时间内的表现。

Uni V4 Backtester 使用了多种技术来制作这个回测器:Viem(NodeJS)用于获取 Uni V3 池事件;Foundry 用于分叉 Sepolia 测试网并执行回测。

Betsy

Betsy 是 Skale 上的 Web3 投注平台,具有 XMTP 驱动的团体投注消息传递功能。USDC 资金通过智能合约透明处理,AI 帮助确定结果。投注在链上完成和解决,确保安全、无需信任且有吸引力的团体投注。

创建赌注后,小组成员可以在平台内聊天、同意或不同意预测并下注。一旦赌注最终确定,智能合约就会自动转移资金。此外,该平台使用 AI 分析实时体育数据并帮助确定每笔赌注的结果。比赛结束后,AI 会检查预测是否正确,智能合约会相应地分配赢利或损失。

Пов'язані матеріали

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

Collateral Dollars: How Does a "Second Layer of Dollars" Form on Top of Stablecoins? Most assume stablecoins replicate Eurodollar functions, expanding the offshore dollar system. However, stablecoins primarily replace specific functions like operational dollar balances for settlement. They do not inherently create new dollar credit; they substitute existing claims. The key question is: what happens when financial intermediaries use stablecoins as collateral to create a new layer of dollar-denominated claims? This "collateral dollar" channel operates through secured lending, not direct money creation. A money-like event only occurs when a liability issued against the controlled stablecoin is funded, rolled over, or accepted at near-par value by another balance sheet. The discount (haircut) prices the gap between "effective control over the token" and "reliable convertibility to bank dollars." Elasticity stems not from the stablecoin itself but from the liability issued against it and the willingness of third-party balance sheets to treat that liability as a near-par asset. Compared to the traditional Eurodollar system—where elasticity originates from bank deposit creation—the stablecoin collateral chain is structurally different. Eurodollar deposits are credit-expansive from inception. Stablecoins are initially substitutive; elasticity emerges later if an intermediary's liability against them gains monetary acceptance. Stablecoins disrupt specific tiers of the offshore dollar system, mainly replacing operational settlement balances. They do not replace the need for full dollar balance-sheet capacity (credit lines, hedging, maturity transformation). For systemic impact, the second-layer liability must pass three tests: transferability, funding capacity, and monetary acceptance (being fundable or held at par by others). Pressure transmission also differs. In the Eurodollar system, stress moves up a hierarchy of claims. In a stablecoin collateral chain, the second-layer liability can lose its money-like status well before the underlying stablecoin faces a run, often triggered by haircut increases and margin calls that create a dynamic spiral of falling token prices and rising discounts. In conclusion, the "collateral dollar" is not the stablecoin itself. It is the second-layer liability issued against a controlled token balance that is willing to be funded and maintained at near-par value. Its existence depends on that liability surviving the leap from "token liquidity" to "bank dollar liquidity."

marsbit4 хв тому

Collateral Dollars: How Does a 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Form?

marsbit4 хв тому

Collateral Dollars: How the 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Takes Shape?

"Collateralized Dollars: How a 'Second Layer of Dollars' Forms on Top of Stablecoins" Most assume stablecoins replicate Eurodollars and expand the offshore dollar system, but this is not accurate. Stablecoins primarily replace certain functions within the existing system, especially operational dollar balances for daily settlement. The critical question is what happens when financial intermediaries create a new layer of dollar claims *on top of* stablecoins. This article explains how this new collateralized funding channel works. Stablecoins introduce tokenized private dollar claims. Even if issuers and reserves are within the US legal perimeter, their circulation and use as collateral can become economically "offshore." Enforceable control over collateral opens a secured credit channel but does not itself create a monetary claim. A true monetary event occurs only when another balance sheet funds, rolls over, or accepts a liability issued against the controlled token at near-par value. The discount prices the gap between "effective control over the token" and "reliable convertibility into bank dollars." Elasticity comes from the balance sheet issuing the liability against the token and from third-party willingness to treat that liability as a near-par asset. Collateralized Dollars are not the stablecoins themselves; they are the second-layer liability that another balance sheet is willing to issue, fund, and maintain at near-par against a controlled token balance. The Eurodollar system is a hierarchy of claims, with elasticity originating in expandable bank liabilities. In contrast, the stablecoin collateral chain starts with a tokenized asset. It gains systemic significance only when an intermediary's liability against that token is treated as money-like by other balance sheets. Key determining factors include: who has effective control, the legal/operational path to bank dollars, and whether the resulting claim can still be financed near-par under stress. Pressure in this new channel manifests differently. The upper-layer (intermediary) claim fails first, losing its money-like status, potentially while the underlying stablecoin remains solvent. Increased haircuts and forced sales can create a destructive feedback loop, widening the very gap the discount measures. In conclusion, the Eurodollar analogy has limits. Reserve quality supports the underlying token's solvency, but the leverage, credit, and liabilities built atop it face a separate test. Collateral eligibility is not monetary acceptance. Only when a claim built on stablecoins survives the leap from "token liquidity" to "bank dollar liquidity" do Collateralized Dollars truly exist.

链捕手10 хв тому

Collateral Dollars: How the 'Second-Layer Dollar' Above Stablecoins Takes Shape?

链捕手10 хв тому

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25 Billion Cap: MicroStrategy's Three-Pronged Bitcoin Sale Pools Hide Massive Selling Pressure

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25B Cap: Strategy's Three-Tier Bitcoin Sales Plan Hides Massive Potential Selling Pressure Strategy recently sold 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to fund a dividend and replenish its dollar reserve, while claiming its $1.25B "reserve build" capacity remains fully available. This highlights a key nuance: the widely cited $1.25B limit applies only to sales for "Building" the reserve. Strategy's broader capital framework, however, allows Bitcoin sales for three primary purposes, each with different scales: 1. **Building the Reserve:** Selling BTC to raise up to $1.25B for the reserve. 2. **Covering Priority Share Expenses:** Selling BTC to pay dividends/interest or to replenish the reserve after such payments are made from it (no specified limit). 3. **Share Repurchase Funding:** Selling BTC to fund up to $1B each in convertible note and common stock repurchases (totaling $2B potential). Combined, just the capped "Build" and "Repurchase" channels could facilitate over $3B in Bitcoin sales, excluding the uncapped "Cover Expenses" channel. The accounting distinction between "Building" (adding cash before a payout) and "Replenishing" (adding cash after a payout) is operationally blurry but allows sales like the recent $216M transaction without touching the $1.25B "Build" quota. This gives Strategy significant flexibility. The move signifies a strategic shift: Strategy is transforming from a simple Bitcoin accumulator into an active capital manager, akin to a hedge fund. Bitcoin is now a financial lever to balance pressures between common stock, convertible notes, dollar reserves, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates inherent tensions—actions benefiting one part of the capital structure may harm another. Investors must understand that the potential Bitcoin sales are far greater than the surface-level $1.25B figure. Strategy has become a complex financial entity where every term in its disclosures matters. Betting on it now is a wager on its active capital management skill to navigate these internal contradictions without a systemic failure.

Foresight News17 хв тому

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25 Billion Cap: MicroStrategy's Three-Pronged Bitcoin Sale Pools Hide Massive Selling Pressure

Foresight News17 хв тому

When the Largest BTC Buyer Becomes a Seller, Who's Buying After MicroStrategy Sells 3,588 Bitcoin?

MicroStrategy, once the largest corporate buyer of Bitcoin, sold 3,588 BTC for approximately $216 million to fund its preferred stock dividends, marking a significant shift from buyer to seller. This move occurred after its market-to-NAV premium vanished, breaking its "print stock to buy Bitcoin" financial model. A roundtable discussion featuring Austin Campbell, Ram Ahluwalia, and Chris Perkins analyzed the implications. They noted that MicroStrategy's dominance has become a narrative bottleneck for the broader crypto market, with some speculating that Bitcoin's price might only surge significantly after the company's influence wanes. The conversation expanded to examine the capital structure conflict between traditional equity and crypto tokens, arguing that most current tokens will fail as they don't fit neatly into existing debt/equity frameworks. A "stablecoin war" was identified as a major trend, with entities like Tether, Robinhood, and the OUSD alliance competing. Tether's decision to abandon the European MiCA market highlights strategic divergences. The panelists argued that bank-issued stablecoins could revolutionize global finance by allowing US banks to capture net interest margins from international transactions, potentially making JPMorgan the first trillion-dollar bank. They concluded that while capital is currently being siphoned by AI/semiconductors, markets will eventually refocus on fundamentals and cash flow, which could benefit cryptocurrencies with real utility.

marsbit23 хв тому

When the Largest BTC Buyer Becomes a Seller, Who's Buying After MicroStrategy Sells 3,588 Bitcoin?

marsbit23 хв тому

Bitcoin’s path to $80K may hinge on THIS hidden trend

Bitcoin's potential path toward $80,000 is influenced by conflicting market signals. Data shows the Coinbase Bitcoin Premium Index has recorded its longest-ever streak of consecutive negative premiums, indicating muted institutional demand or net selling from U.S. institutions. While such a trend often signals short-term weakness, it doesn't necessarily forecast a long-term bear market. Additionally, a bearish crossover occurred in Bitcoin's Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL), with its short-term average falling below the longer-term average, suggesting declining investor profitability and waning market momentum. Historically, major bear market bottoms saw the 100-day NUPL drop below zero, but this cycle it remains positive, implying either an unprecedented bottom or a further decline is needed. Currently trading around $63,148, Bitcoin has seen weekly gains but remains below its May peak. Technical indicators present a mixed picture: the MACD shows bullish momentum, while the RSI signals bearish pressure. A positive development is the return of inflows to Bitcoin ETFs after eight weeks of outflows. Analysts hold divergent views; some highlight a key liquidity zone between $48,000-$50,000 where a market bottom could form, while others maintain a more optimistic long-term outlook. Ultimately, while some bullish signs exist, a strong push from institutional investors appears crucial for Bitcoin to challenge the $80,000 level.

ambcrypto1 год тому

Bitcoin’s path to $80K may hinge on THIS hidden trend

ambcrypto1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片