百花齐放,市值 TOP10 游戏代币大盘点

深潮Опубліковано о 2024-09-24Востаннє оновлено о 2024-09-24

与加密游戏和各网络相关的代币已成为今年发行规模最大的赛道之一。

来源:Decrypt

编译:比推 BitpushNews Mary Liu

2024 年迄今,高市值的新发币种着实不少,其中不乏加密游戏类项目。随着币价整体反弹和空投活动层出不穷,与加密游戏和各网络相关的代币已成为今年发行规模最大的赛道之一。

Notcoin、Portal、Pixels…本文将按照撰稿时的数据介绍市值 TOP10 的游戏代币。

1. Notcoin(NOT)

峰值价格:0.02896 美元

峰值市值:29.7 亿美元

一个新的卫冕冠军,而且甩出其他项目好几条街。Notcoin 于 5 月在 The Open Network (TON) 上推出了其 NOT 代币,在向约 3500 万玩家提供空投的刺激下,其市值迅速飙升至近 15 亿美元。

当然,与许多新发行的代币一样,早期的价格走势波动很大,不久后就下跌了……但随后在 6 月份飙升至新高,市值达到近 30 亿美元的峰值,2024 年没有其他新游戏代币能与其竞争。不过,随着大量基于 Telegram 的新游戏的涌现并覆盖更广泛的受众,热度将集中在那些还未发币的项目上。

2.PIXEL(PIXEL)

峰值价格:1.02 美元

峰值市值:7.31 亿美元

以太坊目前最热门的游戏也是今年最大的代币之一。PIXEL 代币于 2 月下旬推出,用于以太坊扩展器 Ronin 上的休闲农场游戏,并帮助将更多加密原生元素引入网络游戏。它还在不到一天的时间内产生了价值超过 10 亿美元的交易。

Pixels 拥有数十万的日常用户,吸引了加密社区的关注,也帮助 Ronin 建立了一些强大的势头。3 月中旬,PIXEL 的价格突破 1 美元,占据了榜首位置,直到被 Notcoin 赶超。自那时以来,更多代币被解锁,尽管截至撰写本文时,PIXEL 的价格也大幅下跌。

3. Saga(SAGA)

峰值价格:7.60 美元

峰值市值:6.84 亿美元

虽然并非专门的游戏链,但第一层 Saga 网络最初的大部分推广都围绕游戏展开,包括开展「玩转空投」活动,以及公布内部游戏发行部门 Saga Origins 的计划。据 Saga 称,大约 80% 的测试网项目都集中在游戏上。

SAGA 代币引起了巨大轰动,首先是创纪录的币安新币活动,客户押注了价值超过 134 亿美元的资金来获得 SAGA 奖励,然后价格达到峰值,使该代币在今年到目前为止在榜单上排名第二。未来还会有更多空投奖励。

4. Portal(PORTAL)

峰值价格:3.36 美元

峰值市值:5.616 亿美元

Portal 于 2 月 29 日刚刚推出,其热度之高在加密游戏领域已久未见。部分原因是空投挖矿活动推动用户在 Twitter 上发推文,而当时创纪录的币安活动也推动用户押注价值超过 90 亿美元的加密货币,希望获得受益。

然而,价格下跌得相当快,截至最新更新,还远未恢复到原来的水平。即将推出的跨链游戏平台的这款基于以太坊的代币能否重新获得热度?

5.Xai(XAI)

峰值价格:1.59 美元

峰值市值:4.406 亿美元

以太坊扩容器 Arbitrum 上的 Xai 第 3 层游戏网络进行了今年的首次大型空投,奖励了网络守护节点的所有者和运营商以及某些 NFT 持有者。到目前为止,XAI 开局不错,最高价格比下跌时高出一倍多。

游戏开始在网络上推出,这应该会引起人们对代币的更多关注和兴奋,此外 Xai 最近也推出了权益奖励。

6. Catizen(CATI)

峰值价格:1.11 美元

峰值市值:3.386 亿美元

最后,另一款重要的 Telegram 游戏注入了新鲜血液。虽然 Catizen 的代币尚未达到 Telegram 先驱 Notcoin 的高度,但此次发布确实表明,一旦其代币进入市场,此类游戏将具有巨大的吸引力——尽管 Catizen 代币的分发方式在玩家中引起不小争议。

Catizen 是继 Notcoin 之后第二波 Telegram 游戏中最热门的游戏之一,但它的价格是否会维持在这一水平——或者会进一步上涨仍需观察,当然,还有其他大型 Telegram 游戏,如 Hamster Kombat 和 X Empire,它们很快就会在这个名单上争夺一席之地。

7. Heroes of Mavia (MAVIA)

峰值价格:10.59 美元

峰值市值:3.177 亿美元

Heroes of Mavia 是今年最大的新加密游戏发布之一。《部落冲突》克隆版在 iOS 和 Android 上吸引了数百万次下载,Skrice Studios 通过向 100,000 名早期玩家空投代币来庆祝发布,同时还向之前质押了 NFT 的虚拟土地所有者空投代币。

MAVIA 在 2 月份发布后价格大幅上涨,突破 10 美元,比开盘价上涨了 5 倍多。但这只是昙花一现,此后其价值缩水了 80% 以上,游戏团队选择推迟并削减一些代币解锁,以减轻对市场的潜在影响。

8. Gaimin(GMRX)

峰值价格:0.03937 美元

峰值市值:2.612 亿美元

Gaimin 旨在通过去中心化的云计算平台为加密游戏提供支持,让用户贡献闲置的计算资源来获得奖励。该平台的 GMRX 代币于 3 月底刚刚推出。

虽然单个代币的价格很低,但流通量却相当可观,推动市值峰值达到 2.61 亿美元。不过,截至撰写本文时,价格已下跌超过 95%,因此我们拭目以待 Gaimin 能否在短期内回到这一水平附近。

9.Zentry(ZENT)

峰值价格:0.045 美元

峰值市值:2.487 亿美元

ZENT 于 4 月下旬推出,是 Zentry 的原生代币,Zentry 是一个由加密游戏公会转型而来的游戏奖励平台,之前称为 GuildFi。随着品牌重塑,该公司推出了一种新的以太坊代币,并为现有的 GF 持有者提供转换率以过渡到 ZENT。

Zentry 的新代币在一个月后价格达到顶峰,将其市值推高至历史最高点,略低于 2.5 亿美元——尽管像许多游戏代币(以及广泛的加密代币)一样,它自那以后急剧下跌。

10. Apeiron(APRS)

峰值价格:1.88 美元

峰值市值:1.936 亿美元

Apeiron 是一款热门的 Ronin 策略游戏,目前正在举办游戏空投活动,并且最近还在网络的首次代币销售中推出了其 APRS 生态系统代币。

在发布之日,该代币的市值接近 2 亿美元,尽管与上文提到的 Gaimin 一样,其价格自发布之日起有所下跌。不过,其涨幅足以让它跻身此榜单——而且该游戏尚未完全发布。

Пов'язані матеріали

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the third-largest memory chip maker alongside Samsung and SK Hynix, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion. Founded in 1978 in Boise, Idaho, Micron survived brutal industry cycles while American peers and Japan's memory sector faltered. Its survival is attributed to a dual strategy: leveraging political and legal avenues for critical breathing room, coupled with relentless manufacturing cost control. Historically, Micron sought U.S. government intervention three times. In 1985, it filed an anti-dumping complaint against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which later became its toughest competitor. In 2002, Micron turned "whistleblower" in a DRAM price-fixing investigation, escaping penalties while rivals were fined. In 2017, it sued China's Fujian Jinhua, contributing to its placement on a U.S. entity list, stifling a nascent competitor. However, a major strategic misstep occurred in 2013 with the acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. Integrating Elpida's mobile-DRAM-focused technology diverted resources, causing Micron to miss the critical early decade of development for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)—the high-performance memory essential for AI chips like NVIDIA GPUs. By the time AI demand exploded in 2022, SK Hynix, which launched the first HBM in 2013, held about 85% of the HBM3 market, leaving Micron with roughly 3%. Micron now faces a triple squeeze. In the high-end HBM market, it lags significantly behind SK Hynix and Samsung. In the mid-to-low end DRAM market, it faces aggressive price competition from China's CXMT. Furthermore, a 2023 Chinese cybersecurity ban on its products slashed its revenue from China, a once-core market, from over 10% to just 7.1% by FY2025, causing it to exit China's data center server business. Beneath its political maneuvering lies Micron's core strength: exceptional manufacturing efficiency and cost control. Decades of engineering have yielded DRAM chips with a smaller cell area than rivals, meaning more chips per wafer and lower unit costs. This efficiency, not subsidies, has allowed it to withstand price wars. While political leverage bought time, Micron is now paying a "time debt" in the HBM race. It is racing to ramp up HBM3E production and develop HBM4, but catching up to competitors who started a decade earlier is a monumental challenge. Its future hinges on whether its expertise in cost control and political strategy can compensate for the lost time in a technology race where early-mover advantage is decisive.

链捕手21 хв тому

Samsung Relies on Technology Cycles, SK Hynix on HBM, How Did Micron Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

链捕手21 хв тому

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

AMD's new research challenges the conventional understanding of FP4 training instability. While reducing precision from FP8 to FP4 promises doubled computational throughput and is supported by new hardware like NVIDIA Blackwell and AMD MI350 series, training large language models natively with FP4 has been notoriously unstable, often attributed to insufficient stochasticity. The paper "Pretraining large language models with MXFP4 on Native FP4 Hardware" demonstrates successful end-to-end FP4 pre-training of Llama 3.1-8B on AMD MI355X GPUs using the MXFP4 format, achieving a 9-10% overall speedup over FP8. Crucially, it identifies the root cause of instability: not randomness, but the accumulation of *structural micro-scaling errors* along the sensitive weight gradient (Wgrad) path. Through controlled experiments, researchers found that quantizing the Wgrad operation to FP4 caused significant convergence degradation. Counterintuitively, common stochasticity-based mitigation techniques like stochastic rounding and randomized Hadamard transforms worsened performance. In contrast, applying a *deterministic* Hadamard transform successfully stabilized training by ensuring consistent error patterns, reducing the extra token cost from 26-27% to just 8-9%. This work has significant implications: 1) It provides a clear diagnostic for low-precision training instability, steering focus towards structural errors. 2) It pushes FP4 from a primarily inference-focused format into the realm of viable training. 3) It leverages the open OCP Microscaling (MX) standard, promoting cross-vendor compatibility. The research marks a critical step towards more economical large model training by further pushing the boundaries of low-precision computation.

marsbit41 хв тому

New AMD Paper Overturns Conventional Wisdom: FP4 Training Instability's Cause Is Not Insufficient Randomness

marsbit41 хв тому

Will ONDO's 'Tokenization Narrative' Change After Its CEO's Unexpected Passing?

Ondo Finance founder and CEO Nathan Allman has passed away unexpectedly. Allman, a Brown University graduate with a background in private credit and Goldman Sachs' digital asset team, was a key architect of Ondo's pivot from DeFi structured yield products to becoming a leading Real-World Asset (RWA) protocol. He drove the strategy to tokenize traditional financial assets like US Treasuries (OUSG), yield-generating dollar assets (USDY), and US stocks/ETFs (Ondo Global Markets) for on-chain accessibility. The company announced that President Ian De Bode, a former McKinsey partner with a strong institutional strategy and operations background, will succeed Allman as CEO. While Allman's sudden departure presents a near-term challenge, testing market confidence and Ondo's continuity, the project is seen as more than a founder-driven narrative. It has an established product suite and a management team with deep traditional finance experience. The long-term impact hinges on the new leadership's ability to execute. De Bode's expertise in compliance, distribution, and institutional partnerships aligns with RWA's next phase of scaling infrastructure. The core question is whether Ondo can maintain its product momentum and institutional relationships. Ondo's native ONDO token represents governance and RWA narrative value, not direct revenue from the underlying assets. Its future as a "top tokenization play" will depend on the team's continued delivery of product growth, asset scale, and real-world demand, moving beyond the initial emotional shock.

marsbit1 год тому

Will ONDO's 'Tokenization Narrative' Change After Its CEO's Unexpected Passing?

marsbit1 год тому

Bankless Co-founder's Confession on Selling Off ETH: Ethereum Did the Right Thing, but 'ETH as Money' Has No Future

Bankless co-founder David Hoffman recently sold his remaining ETH holdings, sparking debate within the Ethereum community. In a detailed explanation, Hoffman clarifies that his decision was not based on bearish sentiment towards Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about, but rather on the conclusion that the "ETH is Money" narrative has largely run its course. Hoffman argues that for ETH to achieve its envisioned status as global money, Ethereum needed to execute flawlessly across multiple layers—governance, technology, and market dominance—in a highly coordinated manner. He acknowledges Ethereum's significant successes and current justified valuation but suggests the window for a major revaluation based on this monetary narrative is closing. The post examines several challenges: the strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and native token value; the perceived failure of the "strong version" of crypto (user-owned, egalitarian systems) versus the rise of a "weak version" (efficient ledger technology for traditional finance); and the possibility that ETH's momentum as money was uniquely tied to the distorted conditions of the 2020-2021 period. Crucially, Hoffman highlights a structural tension: Ethereum is architected as a "giver, not a taker," providing critical infrastructure like secure block space and tokenization at cost. This ethos benefits the broader ecosystem (applications, L2s) but doesn't prioritize extracting maximum value for ETH itself. The "ETH is Money" thesis required Ethereum to win a war of overwhelming market dominance—a war its design philosophy refuses to explicitly fight. Therefore, while he sees continued immense success for the Ethereum network and its ecosystem (following a "fat application" theory where value accrues to apps and L2s), Hoffman finds it increasingly difficult to foresee a structural upward revaluation for the ETH asset based on the monetary narrative. His capital reallocation reflects a belief that this particular investment thesis has played out.

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Bankless Co-founder's Confession on Selling Off ETH: Ethereum Did the Right Thing, but 'ETH as Money' Has No Future

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片