Everclear主网启动:扩展链抽象,最新代币机制亮相

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-09-19Востаннє оновлено о 2024-09-19

Анотація

主网上线,vbNEXT投票绑定代币机制开启,Everclear发力链抽象。

Everclear主网启动:扩展链抽象,最新代币机制亮相

Web3 清算层 Everclear 现已启动主网,此举旨在解决模块化区块链的流动性分散问题,搭建链抽象技术栈基础。Everclear 主网在上线最初几周将以测试版本运行。此外,Everclear DAO 正在为其代币 NEXT 引入新的投票绑定代币机制。

链抽象机制可以有效简化用户与多个区块链交互体验,该设计模式逐渐获得了高度关注,但目前该模式受到某一特定限制:跨链桥及其运营商(Solvers)难以有效地平衡其流动性并维持必要的平衡以继续运营。随着L2 网络运行速度更快、运行成本更低、启动更容易,新区块链网络的数量呈指数级增长——目前已有 74 条L2链上线,还有更多网络即将推出。这导致了流动性和用户体验的高度分散,由此,跨链意图系统越来越受欢迎,但由于跨链资金再平衡仍然遭遇瓶颈期限制,操作成本昂贵且复杂。因此,目前只有少数 Solvers 承担这一任务,他们几乎无利可图且高度中心化,无法支持链抽象蓬勃发展所需的多种资产和区块链网络。

Everclear 通过解决链间流动性结算协调的挑战,为链抽象的扩展提供了基础。其通过双向流动性净化以及资金再平衡,解决了 Solvers、跨链桥和协议面临的共同问题。因此,所有实体都将以更低成本实现链抽象体验,使任何跨链意图对用户来说都是无缝衔接且隐藏式地进行。

流动性再质押提供商 Renzo 在与 Everclear 集成后,推出了“Restake from Anywhere”活动,最终额外锁定了超 10 亿美元的总锁仓价值(TVL)。在完成集成之前,用户须将 ETH 发送至以太坊主网进行再质押,这既麻烦又昂贵;集成之后,这一过程有了极大改观。目前,Everclear 早期生态系统合作伙伴包括 Metamask、Renzo、Puffer、Safe、Near、Router Protocol、Synapse、Aori、LiFi、Socket、Tokka Labs、Dialectic、Rhino.fi、Symbiosis 等协议及应用。此外,Everclear 还与 Eigenlayer、Arbitrum、Hyperlane、Gelato 和 The Graph 等行业巨头合作紧密,为他们提供多样化技术支持。

Everclear 联合创始人 Arjun Bhuptani 表示:“在拥有数千条区块链网络的加密世界里,应用程序开发的未来是链抽象。开发者应该能够在任何链上打造自己的产品,或者在他们自己的应用程序进行链上建设,而无须考虑用户在哪里。要实现这一点,众多区块链网络需要一个底层协调系统,即清算层,以高效地抵消和结算不同网络之间的用户资金流。Everclear 及其最新的投票绑定机制将通过解决每个新区块链网络和对应资产的相关问题,推动一个更健康、更统一的生态系统的产生。”

新机制将推动大规模高效流动性结算的实现

根据社区 DAO 组织投票,Everclear 正在升级其 NEXT 代币,以激励 Solvers、区块链和协议保持其系统平衡。NEXT 代币持有者可以质押并获得 vbNEXT,后者可用于指导代币供应流通。这一方法鼓励 Solvers 和意图协议通过 Everclear 进行相关结算活动,以此增加网络流动性并提高了网络运行效率。奖励系统将提前设置完成,以平衡代币供应增长并确保对再平衡活动的大力激励,防止大型流动性提供者垄断相关奖励。

关于 Everclear

Everclear 正在构建 Web3 领域首个清算层。通过协调区块链网络之间全球流动性的结算,Everclear 旨在解决模块化区块链的分散问题,以此构建一个开放且可访问的未来网络。用户可以在无需专业知识或承担不必要风险的情况下享受区块链网络的相应好处。如需了解更多信息,请访问官方网站:https://everclear.org

Пов'язані матеріали

To Those Ordinary People Who Haven't Invested in AI: You Think You're Late, You're Just Lacking Your Own Worldview

**Summary:** The article argues that ordinary investors feeling FOMO over missing the AI investment boom lack not timing, but their own independent worldview. Most people chase "what to buy" based on others' opinions (FOMO, envy) rather than fundamental analysis. This leads to costly mistakes: not knowing when to exit winning trades or cut losses on losing ones. The core solution is to develop a personal, long-term (5-10 year) worldview about societal shifts and technological bottlenecks. For most, building this from scratch (Path A) is too demanding. A practical alternative (Path B) is to follow the **capital expenditures (capex)** and strategic investments of visionary leaders, as their money reveals true conviction more reliably than their words. Five key figures to track for different AI perspectives are highlighted: Jensen Huang (NVIDIA, infrastructure), Elon Musk (Tesla/SpaceX/xAI, capex signals), Sam Altman (OpenAI, commercialization, but beware hype), Dario Amodei (Anthropic, technical/safety focus), and Liang Wenfeng (DeepSeek, efficiency/anti-consensus view). The article details how to read capex signals from hyperscalers' financial reports, NVIDIA's revenue breakdown, and strategic investments. It maps the complete AI产业链 (supply chain) from raw materials/energy to models/applications, explaining value flow and inter-dependencies (e.g., how a model release triggers demand across chips, memory, and optics). Finally, it provides an action plan: secure personal finances first, allocate a limited portfolio percentage (max 25%) to the theme, prefer broad ETFs (like QQQ), use dollar-cost averaging over 6-12 months, and write down strict investment rules beforehand to combat emotional errors during market volatility. The conclusion is that a stable, personally-held worldview enables disciplined, long-term investment far more than chasing short-term trends.

marsbit12 хв тому

To Those Ordinary People Who Haven't Invested in AI: You Think You're Late, You're Just Lacking Your Own Worldview

marsbit12 хв тому

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

Microsoft has halted the widespread internal use of Claude Code, withdrawing licenses from most employees by the end of its fiscal year, June 30, 2026. This reversal comes just six months after actively promoting the AI coding tool to boost productivity via "vibe coding"—where developers describe intent in natural language and let the LLM generate code. The core issue isn't the tool's effectiveness; internal reports suggest employees preferred Claude Code over Microsoft's own Copilot CLI. The problem is financial: the "copilot mode" adds a variable, consumption-based token cost on top of existing employee salaries without a proportional revenue increase. As usage grew, the token bills became unsustainable, leading to what sources describe as a cost-structure failure. Similar overruns have been reported at other firms like Uber. The article contrasts this with the approach of AI-native startups, exemplified by Y Combinator's philosophy. Here, high token consumption is strategic—it replaces, rather than supplements, human labor. Startups operate with tiny teams where AI agents handle work previously done by many, making the high token bill financially viable as it offsets much larger personnel costs. The conclusion is that "vibe coding" isn't dead, but its economics fail within traditional corporate structures that treat AI as a productivity add-on for existing staff. Success requires a foundational shift to an AI-native organization, where processes are built to be "legible to AI," and the company's core knowledge and assets reside in documented, AI-accessible systems rather than solely in employees' minds. The future divide will be between companies that merely add AI tools and those that redesign their organizations around them.

marsbit31 хв тому

Microsoft Halts Vibe Coding: "Burning Tokens" Is Now More Expensive Than Employees

marsbit31 хв тому

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

In the past month, the market has been actively trading contrasting expectations, balancing global supply chain disruptions fueling re-inflation against both actual and anticipated (Walsh) interest rate hikes. This volatility has impacted commodities and most equities, though tech has temporarily benefited from concentrated short-term liquidity. Fundamentally, as previously analyzed regarding the Strait of Hormuz situation, the US faces deep-seated balance sheet issues beyond what any single Fed chair can resolve. Hypotheses around a figure like Walsh could only materialize if AI fundamentally reshapes production relations. Until then, most non-AI-leading nations (effectively all except the US and China) risk fiscal and monetary policy collapse, rendering the identity of the Fed chair ultimately irrelevant. For crypto assets, there is currently no clear role in these dominant narratives. The market remains strongly capped by the 200-day moving average. While trends may shift from "anything but AI" to "anything but mines," this phase is dominated by the silicon vs. carbon (AI vs. traditional) dichotomy, leaving little room for crypto—though its time will come. **Market Overview & Commentary** The crypto market lacks significant catalysts beyond hype, plagued by low volume and scarce innovation, with clear technical resistance. Currently, crypto struggles for attention as global focus lies elsewhere. Assets like gold, oil, and grains are more direct hedges against supply-chain-driven inflation/stagflation. Bitcoin needs more time for capitulation and consolidation; this reset is expected to last until at least Q4 2026. Looking ahead, three factors will likely drive future market volatility: 1. Whether Walsh repeats the patterns of predecessors like Bassant or Musk, shifting stance into a new policy cycle. 2. The market underestimates the severity of global supply chain damage and the prolonged time needed for repair, which will eventually lead to recognition of acute resource shortages and price swings. 3. AI non-beneficiary, high-inflation nations (e.g., UK, Japan) will face severe fiscal and monetary crises. Rapid AI-driven displacement could trigger a collapse of existing credit and welfare systems. Ultimately, the market may realize that an AI bubble burst could spark contagious sovereign credit crises. The monetary and fiscal responses to such a scenario could serve as the ultimate catalyst for Bitcoin's next major bull run.

marsbit1 год тому

Metrics Ventures Market Watch: The Brewing Storm

marsbit1 год тому

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

The largest IPO in history is imminent as SpaceX, led by Elon Musk, is set to price its offering on June 12. At a targeted valuation near $2 trillion, this event will mint new billionaires from Musk's inner circle of long-time allies, rewarding their loyalty with unprecedented returns. Key beneficiaries include Antonio Gracias, Musk's close friend and confidant, who holds a 7.3% stake potentially worth over $140 billion, making him the second-largest individual shareholder. Gwynne Shotwell, President and COO since 2002, holds shares valued at roughly $2 billion. Bret Johnsen, the CFO, holds stock worth approximately $1.4 billion. Luke Nosek, a PayPal co-founder and early investor, stands to gain about $5.3 billion. The IPO filing also reveals complex and controversial financial arrangements. SpaceX has guaranteed nearly $20 billion in payments from xAI's subsidiary to Gracias's Valor Equity Partners for AI hardware leases—deals auditors flagged as "failed sale-leaseback" transactions, forcing SpaceX to record them as debt. Despite rapid revenue growth, SpaceX is not profitable, posting a $49 billion loss in 2025 and a $4.3 billion loss in Q1 2026. Capital expenditures are soaring, with over 60% directed toward AI. Public investors will inherit these losses, significant debts, and a governance structure heavily controlled by insiders, including a provision granting Musk up to a billion additional shares if one million people live on Mars.

链捕手1 год тому

Insiders Betting on Musk Are Reaping 'Historic Returns'

链捕手1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片