哈里斯还是特朗普?Kevin O'Leary表示,两者都将带来加密货币监管

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-18Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-18

币界网报道:

Kevin O'Leary表示,当谈到美国未来的数字资产监管框架时,11月总统选举的获胜者并不那么重要。

“这正在成为两党合作,”奥利里在最近的一次采访中告诉《解密》,议员们正在推动立法。“无论谁入主白宫,我们都将制定加密货币政策。”

前总统唐纳德·特朗普在竞选活动中称自己为“加密货币总统”,通过大胆的承诺讨好加密货币所有者。另一方面,副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯(Kamala Harris)尚未概述她作为民主党推定候选人对新兴行业的愿景。

“我知道,特朗普支持加密货币,”奥利里说。“我有机会和他谈谈。”

虽然这位加拿大投资者和《创智赢家》明星渴望了解哈里斯可能会采取什么加密政策,但他认为迄今为止的沉默为哈里斯提供了新的机会。尽管一些加密货币倡导者对乔·拜登总统领导下的现任政府对数字资产的做法并不满意,但他表示,哈里斯可以设定一个新的基调

奥利里说:“她根本没有业绩记录,这在某种程度上可能对她有利。”。“她有一张白纸。她可以开始以任何她希望的方式制定政策。”

本周早些时候,参议院多数党领袖Chuck Schumer(D-NY)承诺在年底前通过加密货币监管。在基层组织Crypto4Harris组织的虚拟市政厅发表讲话时,他认为议员们不能继续“把头埋在沙子里”

众议院于5月通过了《21世纪金融创新与技术法案》(FIT21)。该法案概述了加密货币的市场结构,得到了71名民主党人的支持,而除三名共和党成员外,其他所有人都投票反对该措施。

O'Leary曾是失败的加密货币交易所FTX的发言人,于2022年在国会就加密货币问题作证。他说,他已经“在国会山上工作了三年”,处理了几项加密货币法案,立法的前景似乎越来越不可避免。

Crypto4Harris活动的与会者中有亿万富翁Mark Cuban,他是O'Leary在上述真人秀节目中的长期合作伙伴。此前,Cuban告诉Decrypt,Harris的竞选团队已经提出了几个与加密货币相关的问题。

O'Leary表示,这是一个受欢迎的迹象,希望这将导致一个具体的加密平台。

奥利里在谈到库班与哈里斯团队的互动时说:“我认为,他们用任何资源制定政策越多,就越好。”。“但国会已经制定了很多政策。”

由Ryan Ozawa编辑。

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit3 год тому

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片