2023 Crypto 小展望

0xSorosОпубліковано о 2024-08-16Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-16

行业的信息流通程度和初入行业时已天差地别。中国大陆对加密货币的政策封杀,间接打通了推特作为币圈核心社交渠道。以往微博、微信、电报/推特各为封闭的不同圈层。推特大一统之。信息的流通变得畅通无阻、迅速有效。

国内外信息的红利差消失。币圈信息买办的生意变得难做。媒体类仍然是机械化的搬运与翻译内容。

推特让信息流通的同时。观点变得廉价。鲜有真知灼见。哪怕有,信息的分辨也变得艰难。既得利益者逐渐隐退和消失,哪怕发声也有所保留。很多选择退居幕后操盘。

同时代一起奋斗的从业者们,在一轮牛市后对自身有了新的目标和定位。在币圈的竞技状态很自然从一线跌至二三线。进取心不复从前。你方唱罢我登场。你所能见的全部是新人。

公链/L2/ZK的三大格局与方向的把握不要出错。市场的信息流通速率也体现在对龙头项目的合理估值上。只有在大盘下跌的趋势下,龙头项目才能有估值错配的机会。这样抄底的机会不常有。

APT/SUI/OP/ARB/Zksync/Startnet 五年时间,给到千亿估值不算过分。毕竟前有SOL在最高时打出了千亿美金。这些基础建设的估值又都是在可预测范围内的。好的标的不多,心甘情愿长拿的标的少之又少。大多数人又不愿意拿。因为价太贵,涨太慢。对于大方向和基础建设,做好配置就可以,再辅以择时和仓位的调整。

然而诸如DeFi的行业革命性创新和应用仍未出现,相比上述的基础建设,这些未知事物完全不可预测,同时也是巨额利润的来源。两者结合,攻守兼备。

币圈的发展的确有些慢。当Chatgpt大大提升了人类的工作效率并有可能带来新的技术革命时,币圈的人还在为自己开了一个撸毛工作室而沾沾自喜,或是为了几百美金的空投而争论的面红耳赤。不管怎样,我们需要乐观。

市场结构已然发生巨变,今后的市场就是要让大多数人时刻难受。不要期望能抄到大底。不要期望无论是短期或是长期的操作能顺心顺意。迷茫会是常态。看不懂市场情理之中。

目前仍然倾向于是场内的博弈。没有看到新资金流入行业的迹象。大家不相信银行,更不相信加密货币。不过市场并没有因为此而丧失活力,热点不断,新的基础建设接连不断的上线。以及本轮熊市Degen玩家的热情操作,是不同于以往熊市的。市场结构的变化和宏观经济对行业影响的加深,让大盘的K线无法和以往几轮周期照葫芦画瓢了。

明白自己的位置很重要。你在这个行业,是想靠资源赚钱,还是靠炒币赚钱。你的核心能力在哪里。想在台前还是幕后。了解你的欲望。你究竟想要多少。关于赚钱,你是否会在意道德。明白你的天花板。

如今韭菜的底牌还剩多少。个人以为,是在具备一定知识和素养的前提下,有适时义无反顾的梭哈的勇气。没有知识,只会梭哈,那是鲁莽。又有知识,又会梭哈,是种智慧。而知识需要学习与日常的积累。以及你要深刻明白作为散户你在勇气之外没有任何有优势的地方。

Пов'язані матеріали

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

"Glue Finance founder argues Ethereum's current price underperformance stems from its 'unfinished machine' status. Despite record usage and settlement value in 2026, ETH remains below its 2021 peak because the protocol's continued development creates a dependency on the Ethereum Foundation for guidance and fixes. Key issues include centralized L2 sequencers, governance-based freezes (as seen with Arbitrum), state bloat, a vulnerable public mempool, and looming quantum computing threats. This 'dependency discount' prevents ETH from accruing the 'ossification premium' that markets award to immutable, trustless systems like Bitcoin. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed escape paths: a 'war mode' shift towards centralization for speed (which would sacrifice Ethereum's core value), or simply replacing the EF with another governing body. The only solution is the 'Manhattan Plan' or 'Lean Ethereum': a concerted, accelerated effort to complete and then *freeze* the protocol's neutral core. This involves finalizing critical upgrades in consensus (Lean Consensus), scaling (targeting 1 trillion gas/sec), quantum resistance (leanXMSS signatures), and full ZK-provable execution. The goal is to pass the 'walk-away test'—where Ethereum could run forever, neutrally, without the EF. Success would transform Ethereum into the first programmable, quantum-resistant, immutable global settlement layer, flipping its current discount into a unique 'eternity premium' that surpasses Bitcoin's. Failure—stagnation or trading neutrality for speed—would relegate it to being a slower, less trustworthy competitor."

marsbit26 хв тому

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Coming

marsbit26 хв тому

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

Glue Finance founder argues that Ethereum's current price underperformance, despite high on-chain activity, stems from its incomplete state and lingering dependency on central stewards like the Ethereum Foundation. The core thesis is that the market is discounting ETH not for lack of use, but because the protocol remains a "machine under construction." Key unresolved issues include centralized L2 sequencers with limited escape hatches, state bloat, vulnerable public mempools, and the looming quantum computing threat. This perpetual "work-in-progress" status forces reliance on a small group of maintainers, undermining the network's promise of credible neutrality and immutability. The author, a self-described Ethereum maximalist, rejects two flawed paths: a "wartime mode" of centralizing for speed (surrendering Ethereum's unique value) or merely replacing the Foundation with another governing entity. The only solution is to complete and then "freeze" the protocol's neutral core through a focused "Manhattan Project" dubbed "Lean Ethereum." This project aims to bundle critical upgrades—consensus layer overhaul, massive scaling via ZK-proofs, quantum resistance, and statelessness—into a decisive push to finalize the base layer. Once the core rules are cryptographically solidified and beyond anyone's control (passing the "walk-away test"), Ethereum would shed its dependency discount and earn a "rigidity premium" for its credible neutrality and programmability, potentially surpassing Bitcoin's valuation. The race is between completing this hardening and the risks of protocol capture or stagnation.

链捕手28 хв тому

Glue Finance Founder: ETH Has Entered a Phase of Non-Consensus, an Inflection Point Is Approaching

链捕手28 хв тому

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit1 год тому

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit1 год тому

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit1 год тому

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片