早报 | 计划于下周推出经济政策平台经济衰退仍是美国经济最有可能出现的结果

币界网Опубліковано о 2024-08-11Востаннє оновлено о 2024-08-11

币界网报道：

头条

▌哈里斯：计划于下周推出经济政策平台

美国副总统哈里斯表示，计划于下周推出经济政策平台，在美联储独立性问题上与特朗普的观点完全相左。作为总统绝不会干预美联储的决策。

▌摩根大通CEO：经济衰退仍是美国经济最有可能出现的结果

摩根大通首席执行官Jamie Dimon重申，经济衰退仍是美国经济最有可能出现的结果，他坚持认为“软着陆”的可能性仅为 35% 至 40%。Jamie Dimon在接受 CNBC 采访时强调了市场面临的持续不确定性，指出了地缘政治、住房、赤字、支出、量化紧缩、选举，所有这些都会引起市场的恐慌。尽管他持谨慎态度，但他承认经济表现好于预期。

行情

截至发稿，据Coingecko数据显示：

BTC最近成交价61,056.3美元，日内涨跌幅+0.5%；

ETH最近成交价2,624.02元，日内涨跌幅+0.9%；

BNB最近成交价525.44美元，日内涨跌幅+2.9%；

SOL最近成交价154.19美元，日内涨跌幅-1.3%；

DOGE最近成交价0.1067美元，日内涨跌幅+2.4%；

XPR最近成交价0.5884美元，日内涨跌幅+1.1%。

政策

▌美国国税局公布改革后的加密税表，不再要求披露地址

美国国税局 (IRS) 公布了用于报告数字资产交易的最新1099-DA表格，其中引入了一些关键变化，可能解决过去受到的批评和隐私问题。据报道，新版本将于2025年部分实施，删除了早期草案中的几个有争议的元素。

▌前美国SEC官员：摩根士丹利推销比特币ETF或面临更严格的监管审查

前美国证券交易委员会（SEC）互联网执法部门负责人约翰·里德·斯塔克 (John Reed Stark) 表示，摩根士丹利向其客户大规模推销比特币交易所交易基金 (ETF) 的最新举措可能会导致这家美国银行受到更严格的监管审查。本周早些时候，这家华尔街巨头宣布计划允许其15000名持牌金融顾问开始向客户推销比特币现货ETF。包括贝莱德的IBIT和富达的FBTC。但仅限于净资产在150万美元及以上、风险承受能力高的高净值个人。

区块链应用

▌Gala生态宣布引入Telegram单点登录SSO

据官方消息，Gala生态系统已添加使用Telegram登录凭据的单点登录 (SSO) 选项，此次集成简化了注册流程，让新用户更容易加入Gala生态，据悉，Telegram用户可以随时创建和连接Web3钱包，从而访问Gala提供的所有功能。

▌Runecoin：计划开启Season 2，优先考虑机制和时机

Runecoin 于 X 发文表示，其计划开启 Season 2，优先考虑机制和时机。

▌Maker 社区提议调整多个 vault 类型参数，拟将 DSR 下调至 6%

Maker 发文表示，Block Analitica 团队提议对各种 vault 类型参数进行调整，将在接下来的执行投票中加以考虑。拟议稳定费（SF）变更：ETH-A：降至 6.25%；ETH-B：降至 6.75%；ETH-C：降至 6%；WSTETH-A：降至 7.25%；WSTETH-B：降至 7%；WBTC-A：降至 7.75%；WBTC-B：降至 8.25%；WBTC-C：降至 7.5%；有效 DAI 借款 APY 下调至 7%；；DSR（Dai Savings Rate）下调至 6%。

加密货币

▌QCP Capital：高波动行情已清理市场杠杆，BTC或将在Q4创下历史新高

8月10日消息，QCP Capital在官方频道发文表示，ETH相对于BTC的流动性状况发生了根本性转变，BTC越来越多地融入主流宏观资本市场，但ETH却越来越被边缘化。BTC的数字黄金叙事非常吸引投资者，而ETH则缺乏这样的叙事。不过这不一定只对ETH价格产生负面影响。此外，期权交易上观察到BTC与ETH相比具有相同的结构性看涨趋势，过去两个月资金主要流入BTC，特别是长期看涨资金，而ETH资金主要集中在短期投机。其认为，本周BTC的走势是一次清理杠杆行为，以便在第四季度创下历史新高。

▌拜登前顾问：哈里斯需要非常明确、公开地表达加密货币观点、立场和计划

拜登前顾问Moe Vela表示，哈里斯需要非常明确、非常公开地表达加密货币观点、立场和计划，并且需要建立一个绝对的加密货币平台，加密行业需要了解她的观点，以及知道她对此有何感受。美国民主党要对加密货币有所觉醒，重新审视加密货币的优势，以及加密货币如何真正帮助在美国选举中实现一些目标。据悉，哈里斯拟定于9月10日在美国广播公司 (ABC) 的电视辩论中与特朗普对决，不过有报道称9月4日和9月25日可能还会有额外辩论。

重要经济动态

▌美联储理事鲍曼：对降息保持谨慎

美联储理事鲍曼表示，通胀存在上行风险，劳动力市场持续走强，这表明她可能不准备在9月份美国央行官员下次会议上支持降息。她称，5月和6月在降低通胀方面取得的进展是受欢迎的，但通胀仍高于委员会2%的目标，这令人不安，在考虑调整目前的政策立场时，我将保持谨慎的态度。她还表示，美国的财政政策、移民给房地产市场带来的压力以及地缘政治风险，都可能给房价带来上行压力，且最近失业率跃升至4.3%可能夸大了劳动力市场降温的程度。

▌美国前财长：9月降息50个基点是合适的

报道，美国前财政部长劳伦斯·萨默斯警告不要让总统干预货币政策制定，否则随着时间的推移最终只会损害经济。萨默斯周五表示，「让政客参与进来是愚蠢的游戏，最终结果是更高的通胀和更弱的经济。」萨默斯发表这番言论的前一天，共和党总统候选人唐纳德·特朗普表示，他认为总统应该在美联储政策制定上有一定「发言权」。至于美联储的政策决定，萨默斯表示，鉴于周一以来市场波动和股市下挫已经缓和，「就当前事实而言」，任何紧急降息都站不住脚。尽管如此，萨默斯表示在 9 月的政策会议上「降息 50 个基点可能是合适的」。

百科

▌什么是反向期货合约？

反向期货合约是一种金融安排，要求卖方在合约到期时向买方支付约定价格与当前价格之间的差额。与传统期货不同，卖方从价格下跌中获益。反向期货合约的性质是非线性的。当交易者做多 BTC/USD 反向期货合约时，他们就是在做空美元。由于合约是反向的，交易者的头寸在比特币中的价值较低，比特币的价值越高，相对于美元的价值就越高。

免责声明：作为区块链资讯平台，所发布的文章内容仅供信息参考，不作为实际投资建议。请大家树立正确投资理念，务必提高风险意识。

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit2 год тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit2 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手2 год тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手2 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit4 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit4 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手5 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手5 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit6 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'