第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-06-19Востаннє оновлено о 2024-06-19

Анотація

商店买材料回家交任务、抢不到地种植、背包空间不足、任务板代币奖励少的可怜……

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Asher

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

千呼万唤始出来,推迟多次 Pixels 第二章在今日上午正式上线。作为 Ron 生态日活用户最多的链游,当第二章上线的消息一出,海内外社区瞬间热闹起来,探讨最新的打金策略,赢在起跑线。但随着用户的不断体验,社区氛围充满了怨气:

  • “设计有点非人类,任务板在家,但买东西要跑出来去商店买,溜人玩呢?”

  • “本来材料分的级别多就占背包格子,但每个格子竟然改成了最多放 99 个,没干啥背包就满了,怎么玩,要一直跑来跑去吗?”

  • “直接屯的材料,除了棉花,其他约等于归零,屯货党亏麻了。”

  • “花了不少金币刷任务板,结果奖励好几个就给 0.2、0.25 个币,怎么越奖励越少呢,不是说清除了很多机器号吗?”

  • ……

虽然团队多次在 AMA 中强调第二章花费了大量的精力,但从当前的社区反馈来看,大部分真实玩家很不满意,游戏改动大并且收益少。下面,Odaily星球日报根据实践体验,社区反馈等解析 Pixels 第二章。

简介

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

图源:官推

Pixels 游戏是 2021 年推出的一款元宇宙农场游戏,重现了经典 16 位角色扮演冒险的氛围,让玩家在像素艺术世界中导航,相互互动、耕种土地、玩迷你游戏并获得代币奖励。它还允许精选 NFT 个人资料图片(PFP)收藏品的持有者在游戏中使用他们拥有的头像。

融资方面,目前 Pixels 已完成二次融资,分别为:

  • 2022 年 2 月 11 日,宣布完成 240 万美元种子轮融资,Animoca Brands 与 PKO Investments 领投,OpenSea、Untapped Capital 和 Leonis Capital 参投;

  • 2024 年 2 月 8 日,宣布完成 480 万美元战略轮融资

并且,Pixels 已于 2024 年 02 月 09 日 08: 00 (UTC+ 8)上线币安开启挖矿,持续 10 天,并在 2024 年 02 月 19 日 18: 00 (UTC+ 8)上线交易。

第二章变动大汇总

大变动一:新增技能与原有技能合并

技能中新增了石材加工(Stoneshaping)和金属加工(Metalworking),升级曲线已调整,级别之间的经验值已改变。并且,对第一章中多个技能进行合并,分别为:农业(Farming)、林业(Forestry)、烹饪(Cooking)、矿业(Mining)、手工业(Woodwork)、动物护理(Animal Care)、商业(Business)、探险(Exploration)。

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

Pixels 第二章技能一览

各技能所能生产的材料、当前市场价格、收益情况等可在 pixels.tips 中“Resources”与“Crafting”中查看。

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

pixels.tips

大变动二:任务板改在玩家自己的 Speck 内

进入“My Speck”后,进入入下图所示的主房间内,点击“Infinifunnel”即可查看任务板

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

根据社区反馈,任务板中的代币奖励明显少于第一章,并且多次出现 0.2、 0.25、 0.5 等带有小数点的 Pixels 代币奖励。

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

最新任务板

大变动三:Speck 与主房间均可以进行升级(起初升级花费金币,之后需要花费 Pixels 代币)

Speck 升级:点击 Speck 中的 Home 后,点击“Upgrade”即可升级;

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

主房间升级:进入房间后,点击“House Manager”,再点击“Upgrade”即可升级。

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

大变动四:种植作物时间大幅减少并且每块土地同一时间仅能一人种植、树木可以通过商店购买在 Speck 上种植并种植时间大幅度减少。

一方面,如同所示,每块土地同一时间仅能一人种植。并且,值得注意的是,需要满足对于技能级别才能种植对应植物(对应关系见下表)。

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

另一方面,如下图所示,树木不再稀有,树木可以通过商店购买在 Speck 上种植并种植时间大幅度减少。

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

除此之外,也有背包增加到 12 个格子、单个格子上限下降为 99 个、主房间可以通过睡觉恢复能量等。

更多游戏策略方面内容,Odaily星球日报在实战策略有效后也会第一时间分享给大家。

团队反馈

本次第二章版本大升级,国内外社区在社交媒体中发布了各种抱怨的情绪。Pixels 创始人 Luke 在 X 平台发文表示,对于能量消耗过快、代币奖励过少的反馈已经记录,第二章希望真正的用户获得更多的奖励。因此,团队愿意尝试明天就对版本进行更新改变代币奖励,并且在未来的几周内持续调整,已确保真实用户的收益。

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

Pixels 创始人 Luke 对社区反馈的回应

小结

总的来说,用户翘首以盼的第二章不仅没有带来令人耳目一新的玩法创新,甚至连收益也不如第一章。从服务器拥挤程度也可以看出,当前持续体验第二章的用户热情不够高涨(拥挤频道仅有 8 个)。

第二章大改动收恶评,Pixels还值得参与吗?

服务器拥挤程度

在创始人 Luke 多次 AMA 中承诺确保真实用户收益的情况下,尽管封禁了许多机器人,真实用户的收益却不增反减。同时,团队一直强调的公会碎片也未能为玩家带来更多收益,确实令忠实玩家感到失望。唯一值得欣慰的是,团队对社区的负面反馈作出了迅速且正面的回应,并表示愿意立即改进和持续优化。那么,对于团队之后对第二章的更新,你是否充满期待?

Пов'язані матеріали

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手7 хв тому

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手7 хв тому

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbit35 хв тому

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbit35 хв тому

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

The article investigates Sam Altman's personal wealth strategy, centered around his investments in approximately 400 companies while serving as OpenAI's CEO. Despite not holding direct equity in OpenAI, Altman has built a vast portfolio, with at least 10 of his investments having commercial ties or ongoing negotiations with OpenAI. This creates a complex network of potential conflicts of interest, drawing scrutiny from U.S. congressional committees and state attorneys general. Key investments highlighted include the anti-aging startup Retro Biosciences (valued at $258 million for his stake as of late last year) and the chipmaker Cerebras, whose value soared following an OpenAI procurement deal. His most significant financial gain is linked to the nuclear fusion company Helion, where a recent funding round reportedly increased his stake's value to at least $4.1 billion. The article details a decade-long relationship between Altman, Helion, and OpenAI, including a controversial non-binding power purchase agreement and Altman's efforts to secure investments from OpenAI and its backer SoftBank for Helion. Other points include internal investigations at Tools for Humanity (developer of Worldcoin) and OpenAI's massive contracts with tech giants like Nvidia. According to Forbes, Altman's net worth is around $3.4 billion, ranking him 1251st globally—a rise of over 1400 places since 2024. OpenAI's board states that Altman's external dealings are transparent and potential conflicts are carefully managed.

Odaily星球日报56 хв тому

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

Odaily星球日报56 хв тому

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System Using First Principles

Former SpaceX engineer Lex Li applies "First Principles Thinking" to financial infrastructure with Plan Execution Lab, recently raising angel funding at a $50M post-money valuation. The team argues that the core function of finance is capital allocation, and the critical gap is not in trading but in execution, which remains highly manual and fragmented. While assets, liquidity, and settlement have migrated on-chain, execution workflows (monitoring, risk management, liquidity coordination) are still human-native. In an era of accelerating AI agents, strategy decay is rapid, shifting the competitive edge from having the best strategy to having the most robust execution network. Plan Execution Lab introduces two core components: 1. **PlanX**: A Financial Execution Protocol designed as infrastructure for the migration from CEX to DEX, providing on-chain execution capabilities, liquidity access, risk management, and capital orchestration. 2. **Xgent**: An Autonomous Financial Runtime. Users define investment intents, risk preferences, and constraints; Xgent automatically constructs an execution graph, verifies it, and handles ongoing execution and optimization—streamlining the process from Intent to Autonomous Execution. The long-term vision is to create the "Bloomberg Terminal for Autonomous Finance"—a shared operating environment and execution network built collectively by participants like execution nodes, liquidity providers, and autonomous agents. The future of finance, they contend, belongs not to isolated algorithms but to open, collaborative execution networks.

marsbit1 год тому

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System Using First Principles

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片