简析Solana生态第三人称FPS游戏Nyan Heroes

PanewsОпубліковано о 2024-05-21Востаннє оновлено о 2024-05-21

Анотація

Nyan Heroes 是一个第三人称 FPS 射击游戏,玩家可以控制由 Nyan 和其驾驶的机甲与对手战斗。

作者:雨中狂睡
之前曾经聊的,也让大家 0 撸刷分的 @nyanheroes 马上要在 5 月 21 日 TGE 了。

简析Solana生态第三人称FPS游戏Nyan Heroes


这意味着,撸分的朋友要有空投了。
下面我就来和大家简单聊一下这个项目,以及我个人对于这个游戏的观点。
让我们一起潜入⬇️
1/ 游戏简介和背景
Nyan Heroes 是一个第三人称 FPS 射击游戏,玩家可以控制由 Nyan 和其驾驶的机甲与对手战斗。游戏使用的是虚幻 5 引擎。
$NYAN 由 Mechanism Capital 领投,参投的还有 AK 和 Solana Ventures,Solana 官号也转过。从其游戏品质和下载数量来看,Nyan 算是给匮乏的 Solana 游戏生态注入了一个强心剂(Nyan 还与 G2、Team Liquid 有一些合作)。在 TGE 后, $NYAN 将会上线 Bybit 和 Backpack。
虽然 $NYAN 在 Jupiter LFG 的第二次投票中没有胜出,但其游戏品质和背景都还不错,值得关注。
2/ 游戏游玩体验
Nyan 如今已经在 Epic 上线。
为了得到更加准确的游戏体验反馈,我采访了几个群友,以下是我个人的一些总结。
整体来看,游戏 UI/UX 和传统射击游戏类似(还是有些粗糙,但游戏画面还行),对于之前玩过射击游戏,特别是玩过守望先锋的玩家而言,其上手难度不高。它和守望先锋一样,都是小技能 + 大招的模式,人物特色也类似。
上文提到过,游戏的核心玩法是「玩家通过控制 Nyan 和其驾驶的机甲与对手战斗」。这意味着,当机甲死亡时,玩家还可以控制 Nyan 进行战斗,当达成复活机甲的条件后,玩家就可以重新召唤机甲进行战斗(类似于守望先锋中的 DVA)。
与守望先锋的区别是,游戏的枪械是自选,同样的角色(角色自带技能)可以使用不同的武器。玩家可以依据自身习惯和经验来选择适合自身角色技能的武器。如此下来,游戏的可玩性和策略性会更高一些。
不过游戏需要完善的点也比较多,比如平衡性、在 UI/UX 上的优化、对角色和枪械更加详细的说明、地图不够完善、游戏内操作不够丝滑等等。这些问题都不算是大问题,目前游戏处于 EA(测试)阶段,几个版本的更新优化便可解决这些问题。完整版游戏将会在明年初之前发布。
3/ 游戏数据
据 Block 报道,在上线 Epic 商店之后,有 200K 玩家下载了 Nyan 这款游戏,同时游戏也跻身进入 Epic 商店 top 30 most-played games。
4/ 代币经济学(总量应该是 1B)
其中 50% 的代币将被用于 Community/Incentives 和 Ecosystem。
3% 会给到做市商和 Liquidity。
47% 会给到投资者、顾问和团队。

简析Solana生态第三人称FPS游戏Nyan Heroes


游戏 Utility⬇️

  • 激活 Web3 模式,以获得更多的奖励
  • 购买高级物品和皮肤,在市场上交易稀有物品和皮肤
  • 通过出租资产来获得费用收入
  • 锦标赛的报名费
  • And more

另外白皮书中提到,玩家 maybe 可以锁定 $NYAN 来获得特殊的访问权限和奖励。

简析Solana生态第三人称FPS游戏Nyan Heroes


从这张图就可以看到 Nyan 想做的事情:
1、通过游戏中的虚拟代币 CATNIP 区分 Web2 和 Web3 玩家,Web2 玩家可以在不接触到 Token/NFT 的情况下游玩游戏。
2、根据玩家的实际付出(免费和付费)给到活跃玩家奖励和激励。
3、除了赛季奖励,玩家拥有多种获得收入的来源(市场交易)。
4、团队可以在游戏活跃度玩家身上赚到钱,这也是让其好好做游戏的动力。
总体看下来,这个游戏的基本面在 Web3 游戏当中还是不错的,上线的 CEX 也是除 Binance 和 OKX 外的 Top CEX(参考 $MAVIA )。Backpack 上线的币一开始表现也都不错,我会考虑在开盘后买入。具体的空投规则还不清楚,到时候我们再聊一下。
补充一句: $NYAN 将会是整个游戏生态的核心,基本上与 Web3 相关的地方都是使用 $NYAN 作为媒介。 该游戏团队来自于命运、光环、质量效应、刺客信条、堡垒之夜等游戏制作团队。 游戏工作室同样可以参与进来。 我比较看重的点是,Nyan 能否有机会吸引更多的 Web2 玩家进来。

简析Solana生态第三人称FPS游戏Nyan Heroes


对比一下其他游戏的估值:

  • Pixels Online 1.7B
  • Mavia 841M
  • Illuvium 795M
  • Shrapnel 297M

我觉得 Solana 上的游戏估值可能会贵一些,而且 Nyan 的基本面不错,可能 300M-500M 估值可能会是一个很好的买入区间?我猜。NFA

Пов'язані матеріали

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

On August 19, 2026, the U.S. Treasury unexpectedly announced it would at least double the size of its long-term Treasury buyback operations, starting September 9. The move triggered an immediate market reaction, with the 30-year yield falling 9 basis points. This intervention came against a backdrop of the 30-year yield hitting a 19-year high of 5.34% the previous day, driven by persistent inflation, high oil prices, deteriorating U.S. fiscal health with public debt surpassing $40 trillion, and a global "buyers' strike" for long-dated bonds. Treasury buybacks involve the government repurchasing older, less liquid bonds from the market via reverse auctions to improve market functioning, not to reduce overall debt. While the action provided tactical relief and signaled the Treasury's willingness to intervene, analysts caution it does not address core structural issues: massive fiscal deficits, high borrowing needs, and fading demand from traditional buyers like foreign central banks. For investors, the announcement offered short-term support for long-duration bond ETFs and boosted assets like gold, which rose 2.7%. However, it's unlikely to significantly lower mortgage rates or alter the challenging environment for long-term bonds. The key takeaway is the distinction between a tactical market operation and the unresolved structural pressures that continue to push yields higher, requiring close monitoring of upcoming economic data, Treasury auctions, and potential signals of more aggressive policy measures.

marsbit6 хв тому

Government Intervention in the Bond Market: What Does It Mean?

marsbit6 хв тому

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

Following an unscheduled announcement from the U.S. Treasury Department on August 19th, investor discussions have intensified regarding the potential for future policy interventions in long-term bond markets. The Treasury increased the maximum size of its regular buyback operations for 10-to-30 year bonds from $2 billion to $4 billion, citing a desire to improve liquidity. This move came shortly after a surge in long-term yields, with the 30-year Treasury yield briefly touching 5.34%. Market analysts, rather than focusing on the modest operational size, have interpreted the timing—outside the normal quarterly communication window—as a significant signal. The move has been dubbed the "Bessent Put," implying the market's growing expectation that Treasury officials, led by Deputy Secretary Josh Bessent, may act to prevent a disorderly rise in long-term borrowing costs. This perception represents a potential shift in the market's view of the government's "policy reaction function." The underlying pressures on long-term bonds are multifaceted, including large fiscal deficits, increased Treasury supply, a rise in corporate debt issuance for AI infrastructure (creating a "crowding out" effect), and uncertainty around foreign holdings, particularly from Japan. Geopolitical risks in the Middle East further complicate the policy landscape, potentially creating conflicting pressures between fighting inflation and managing financing costs. However, the article clarifies that this Treasury buyback program is distinct from Quantitative Easing (QE). It is a debt management operation, not a Federal Reserve balance sheet expansion. While the announcement opens the door for market speculation about more forceful tools like Yield Curve Control (YCC) or a return to QE, analysts note that conditions would need to deteriorate significantly for such measures to be implemented. For now, the "Bessent Put" reflects a change in market expectations about possible policy boundaries, not an imminent launch of new monetary stimulus.

marsbit6 хв тому

After 'Bessent Put', How Far Is the U.S. from Restarting QE?

marsbit6 хв тому

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

"Is Stablecoin Truly Necessary for Cross-Border Payments? While stablecoins are often praised as superior for cross-border transfers—especially if the recipient desires crypto—their advantage is less clear in traditional cross-currency scenarios (e.g., USD to Mexican Peso). The existing correspondent banking system is slow and costly (≈15% fees) due to multiple intermediaries. Modern fintech solutions like Wise have dramatically improved this by using a netting model: they hold local currency pools and settle payments domestically, avoiding actual cross-border fund movement. This offers near-instant transfers with low, transparent fees (averaging ~0.52%). The 'stablecoin sandwich' model (convert fiat to stablecoin, transfer on-chain, convert to local fiat) offers similar user experience but doesn't inherently provide major cost or speed advantages over fintech. Its on-chain transfer is cheap, but fiat conversion spreads remain. Stablecoin's real innovation is 'unbundling' the cross-border payment stack. Instead of requiring a proprietary global network like Wise, businesses only need reliable on- and off-ramps in specific corridors. This lowers market entry barriers, fosters competition among local providers, and can drive down costs, particularly for niche or underserved corridors (e.g., US to Africa). While vertical integration may reoccur, the open, permissionless nature of the underlying blockchain layer makes monopolistic pricing difficult. The long-term benefit is the potential redistribution of value—previously captured as intermediary rents—to consumers through lower costs."

marsbit10 хв тому

Is Stablecoin Really Necessary for Cross-border Payments?

marsbit10 хв тому

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

Ethereum has surged above $2,300, a level not seen in over three months, marking a significant recovery and technical breakthrough by reclaiming key resistance levels, including the weekly EMA50 for the first time in the current bear market. The rally has been fueled by a combination of factors: improved market risk appetite, positive regulatory sentiment, and a major short squeeze where over 88% of recent ETH liquidations were short positions. The ETH/BTC ratio has also broken its long-term downtrend, indicating renewed strength for Ethereum relative to Bitcoin. Fundamentally, Ethereum spot ETFs have shown strong inflows, outperforming their Bitcoin counterparts in recent months. Wall Street institutions like Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan have notably increased their ETH exposure, while several banks have added or expanded positions in ETH ETFs. On-chain fundamentals remain robust, with the proportion of staked ETH reaching a new all-time high of nearly 33.7%. Data indicates long-term holding sentiment, as small wallet holdings increased while large outflows were often directed towards staking or contracts, not selling. However, potential headwinds include declining staking yields and community debate over proposals to adjust staking rewards at high participation levels. The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade, featuring improvements to validator exit efficiency, could enhance liquidity and further attract institutional stakers. While the rebound is supported by sentiment, capital flows, and fundamentals, its sustainability hinges on continued positive developments.

marsbit10 хв тому

Ethereum Finally 'Bounces Back'! ETH Returns to the Golden Line, What's Different About This Rally?

marsbit10 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片