浅谈Restaking赛道后续发展:AVS落地赋能为正途?

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-05-10Востаннє оновлено о 2024-05-10

Анотація

如何看待Restaking行业现状以及后续可能性的变局?

原文作者:Haotian(X:@tmel0211

最近,一系列因素包括: @eigenlayer  的空投预期落地、 @RenzoProtocol 上线后表现不及预期,以及其他 Restaking 的 Fomo 情绪降低,都无疑给 Restaking 再质押赛道降了降温。如何看待 Restaking 行业现状以及后续可能性的变局?接下来,我简单分享几个观点:

1)Restaking 赛道确实经历了一段很长时间的非理性繁荣发展,从积分大战到 ETHFI、Renzo、Puffer、Swell 等被寄予高市场厚望,再质押赛道陷入了一个抢夺原生 ETH 和 LST 凭证的“锁流动性”数据秀场模式,仿佛谁能吸引更多的资产锁入,谁就能在未来创造更大的预期价值,因此得到一个进入市场的更高估值?

在我看来,这个价值估算标准离大谱,都忽略了一个本质,锁 LST 凭证这类资产给积分创造了不了增量价值,背后的 AVS 网络市场局面能够打开,真正创造出收益才是价值显现的开始。很显然,非理性情绪下,大家的预期和焦点并没有放在 AVS 的落地应用层面,取而代之用吸引流量和资产的方式换来的高预期,并得不到有效支撑;

2)Eigenlayer 的仓促发 Token,而且提出了 intersubjective 的创新范式,实在说这个 Token 发行在我看来像是专门为“灭火降温”而来。因为若 Restaking 积分乐高大战进一步妖魔化,带给 Eigenlayer 的压力也会被指数级放大,一旦 Eigenlayer 在未来发展过程中风吹草动都会引发再质押行业诱发连锁共振危机。

Eigenlayer 发 Token 预期的落地,会明显让积分大战这类 Fomo 风气降温,让市场把注意力聚焦到再质押的支撑点 AVS 网络效应的增长本质上。

3)AVS(主动验证服务),简单而言,是从以太坊的上万个节点运维商当中筛选出部分节点,做一些相应的软硬件及技术服务能力增强,进而让这些 Validators 在维持其原本以太坊共识的基础上,新增拓展一些维系其他 Rollup 等网络安全的服务能力,进而获得额外收益的可能性。(相当于从大量“矿工”中抽象出一些“矿池”然后做一些业务拓展)

AVS 网络可以理解成在以太坊基础 Infra 层当中做了一些“中间件”服务强化,让一些节点联合起来,可以做去中心化 Sequencer、去中心化 Oracle 等等服务能力的“封装”以及商品化输出。理论上,只要 AVS 所辖节点的能力边界足够大,只要在以太坊的大共识框架内,可以拓展的应用落地场景将非常可观。

再通俗理解,原先这些中间件网络需要外部共识构建来接入,现在直接让以太坊的底层基础设施可兼备这样的服务能力,而且其又能代表一定以太坊安全共识。AVS 节点强化应用范式,可以视为一次给以太坊增加业务拓展能力的潜力方向,但它的重点在节点服务能力增强,以及 AVS 网络服务能力的真正落地并产生效益转化。而并非 AVS 带来的附属质押再质押以及积分 War 预期属性。

4)事实上,AVS 节点强化应用范式,在以太坊网络之外,也都有所体现:比如: @MarlinProtocol 通过分布式节点增强,可以实现为一些 AI 模型训练需求方提供租用算力支持;又比如: @FlareNetworks 通过增强其链下分布式 Oracle 节点能力,可以让 Oracle 节点直接集成 EVM 网络和链上生态打通,开辟 Oracle As A Service 的叙事方向。(抽空再详细跟进分析解读)

这些原本在幕后在底层的节点运维方进行能力强化增强后,可以为原链带来更广泛的业务增长能力。

回过头来来看,原本 Eigenlayer 原本做再质押只是为了给其 EigenDA(首个 AVS)提供基础安全能力,却不曾想却打开了再质押的“潘多拉魔盒”:消极面看,若不加引导和控制,再质押的虚假繁荣会进一步放大以太坊网络潜在的流动性危机;积极面看,从 AVS 节点能力增强视角来解读,Restaking 确实会给区块链生态系统注入全新的叙事方向和想象空间。

这才是再质押赛道的未来吧,无它。

Note:若您对 Restaking 再质押赛道缺乏系统了解,推荐订阅参考web3 caff 的万字研报,全景式拆解 Eigenlayer 引领的再叙事赛道情况,背后的原理以及发展趋势等等。

Пов'язані матеріали

DRAM ETF Issuer: Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron All Surpass $1 Trillion, the AI Era of Memory Chips Has Only Just Begun

Authors: Dave Mazza, Thomas DiFazio | Source: Deep Tide TechFlow The article, written by Roundhill Investments (issuer of the DRAM ETF), responds to Morningstar's caution about investing in memory chip stocks. Morningstar warns of the sector's history of boom-bust cycles, a lack of economic moats, and potential momentum-driven overvaluation. Roundhill argues the current situation is structurally different due to AI. Key points in Roundhill's rebuttal include: * **Changed Demand & Supply Dynamics:** AI infrastructure, not consumer electronics, is now the primary growth driver for memory demand. New, strict long-term supply agreements with hyperscalers reflect the high capital intensity of advanced manufacturing. * **Existence of a Moat:** High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), essential for AI, has extremely high manufacturing barriers. The market is dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, with new entrants blocked by technological complexity and long lead times for equipment like ASML's EUV machines. * **Strong Fundamental Outlook:** Analyst consensus projects the three companies will rank among the world's most profitable by 2027, with combined profits of $704 billion on over $1 trillion in revenue. Their operating margins have already reached record highs. * **Valuation Re-rating:** Despite significant stock price gains, memory stocks trade at attractive valuations (e.g., a median NTM P/E of 8.37x for the DRAM ETF) relative to projected explosive EPS growth. Roundhill suggests historical valuation frameworks may no longer apply given the new profitability paradigm. Conclusion: Roundhill contends the rally is justified by fundamentals, marking a structural shift for the memory industry into a new era of sustained, AI-driven demand against constrained supply, rather than a repeat of past cycles.

marsbit16 хв тому

DRAM ETF Issuer: Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron All Surpass $1 Trillion, the AI Era of Memory Chips Has Only Just Begun

marsbit16 хв тому

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major organizational restructuring, involving a 20% staff reduction (approx. 54 employees) and a division into functional clusters like Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional layers. Co-founder Vitalik Buterin further revealed plans to cut the EF's budget by around 40% over the coming years, aiming to reduce its annual spending rate from about 15% to roughly 5% by 2030, transitioning to an endowment-driven model. This overhaul is seen as a long-overdue correction to the EF's ambiguous role. As Ethereum grew, the foundation faced persistent criticism over ETH sales, perceived lack of execution, and unclear strategy, often becoming a focal point for community frustration amid ETH's price stagnation. The reform aims to redefine the EF's boundaries, narrowing its focus to core protocol research, public goods funding, and ecosystem coordination, while offloading more applied development work to the broader market. Concurrently, ecosystem forces like the newly formed Ethlabs (founded by ex-EF researchers) and other independent groups are stepping in to fill the space, signaling a shift from a centralized model to a more distributed, collaborative ecosystem structure. The move was notably praised by Solana co-founder toly, who viewed a "leaner" EF as potentially more decisive and agile.

Odaily星球日报57 хв тому

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

Odaily星球日报57 хв тому

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

Dragonfly partner Haseeb explores the distorted economics of AI model pricing, drawing parallels to tax policy. He notes that startups and small teams (under 150 users) enjoy heavily subsidized, fixed-price AI subscriptions (like Claude Code), where the marginal cost of an additional token is effectively zero. This creates a powerful incentive for them to maximize token usage ("token-maxxing") and innovate aggressively with AI automation. In contrast, large enterprises (over 150 users) are forced onto "Enterprise" plans, paying per-token API fees with high (~75%) markups. This acts like a steep "tax" on AI-powered labor, disincentivizing marginal automation and experimental use, and encouraging them to retain more human workers. Haseeb argues this pricing creates a "150-person cliff," a regulatory notch similar to labor laws in France that discourage firms from growing past 50 employees. He predicts the fastest-growing future companies may deliberately cap their headcount at 149 to avoid the punitive enterprise pricing. This would foster an "AI-first" management philosophy obsessed with automation and outsourcing to stay lean. While not intentionally designed, this bifurcated pricing could become one of the most influential de facto tax policies, shaping how AI replaces labor—not through mass layoffs at big firms, but through agile, AI-native startups outcompeting them.

marsbit1 год тому

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

marsbit1 год тому

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

xBubble: Addressing the Structural Gap in the VC-Backed OPC Economy The concept of OPC (One Person Company) is evolving from a buzzword to a significant AI-driven market. While AI coding tools like Replit and Lovable have validated demand from non-technical users wanting to build applications, a key gap remains: the leap from creating a demo to running a stable, evolving business. These tools still require users to manage the development process, including technical judgments for integrations, modifications, and deployments—a major hurdle for OPCs. xBubble, by DAPPOS, tackles this by shifting from "Prompt-to-Code" to "SOP-to-Business." Instead of generating code from instructions, its core is a system of pre-organized SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) that translate business goals—like "sell World Cup merchandise"—into complete, executable workflows. This includes generating cohesive assets, pages, payment systems, and backend logic. The platform is augmented by a network of third-party service providers who handle infrastructure (hosting, domains, payment setup), acting like "on-site service engineers." Users can pay for these services directly with xBubble credits, simplifying onboarding. This ecosystem aims to deliver not just an app, but a complete, modifiable business launch path. xBubble targets a clear OPC segment: small commercial nodes (e.g., creators, merchants) with existing products, customers, or channels, but for whom a full tech team is unjustifiable. Its potential lies in SOPs accumulating expertise from real cases, improving reliability and reducing delivery costs over time. Additionally, its native support for crypto payments caters to global or digital-native OPCs. In summary, as AI democratizes software creation, xBubble's opportunity is to prove that "SOP-to-Business" provides more immediate value for launching a real, operational business than a powerful but unstructured AI coding tool.

链捕手1 год тому

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

链捕手1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片