盘点ARC-20热门资产:QUARK及SOPHON

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2024-01-23Востаннє оновлено о 2024-01-23

Анотація

对于ARC-20资产,社区正期待着两个利好消息落地。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Asher

编辑 | 秦晓峰

盘点ARC-20热门资产:QUARK及SOPHON

近期由于 BTC 的持续下跌使得铭文市场无论是一级打新,还是二级交易都相对冷清。但 ARC-20 板块的铭文仍存在一定热度,尤其是夸克(QUARK)、智子(SOPHON)。Odaily星球日报带大家详细了解 ARC-20 代币以及该生态的热门项目。温馨提示,市场波动巨大,投资前务必进行充分的研究。

盘点ARC-20热门资产:QUARK及SOPHON

ARC-20 资产

夸克与智子都属于 ARC-20 代币,ARC-20 代币是一种染色币模型,注册信息被刻入交易脚本,余额使用 UTXO 的 Satoshi 数量表示,转账功能完全由 BTC 主网处理。ARC-20 标准规定每个 ARC-20 代币的最小单位是 1 Satoshi。这不仅确保了代币的最低价值,还使得创建和管理 AEC-20 资产变得高效,灵活。值得一提的是,ARC-20 命名系统的唯一性降低了山寨代币带来的负面影响,使整个系统清晰和统一。下面,着重介绍该板块热度较高的两个项目——QUARK 与 SOPHON。

QUARK:持币地址最多

在 12 月的最后一周,比特币生态几乎全网都在挖夸克(QUARK),其英文含义 QUARK 是构成物质的基本单位,与组成 Bitcoin 的最小单位 SATS 类似,夸克在一定程度上具有 Meme 属性。由于夸克拥有持币地址多、基础共识强等特点,许多社区成员认为夸克有望成为 Atomicals 生态中能出圈的 Meme 币。

从参与度的角度来看,夸克的设计具有一定优势。一方面,夸克的总量为 50 万,每张夸克包含 2 万枚,这意味着需要相当长的时间才能铸造完毕。这样的设计可以吸引更多人参与,形成一定的共识。另一方面,夸克挖矿的难度为 6 ,相对于 Electron 和 Neutron 来说相对简单,能让更多的人参与一级的铸造过程。整个铸造过程,每张夸克的平均成本大约在 20-30 美元,下图为 BTC 网络 Gas 在 97 左右的铸造成本,约为 23.2 美元。

盘点ARC-20热门资产:QUARK及SOPHON

夸克铸造成本(Gas= 97)

在二级市场方面,夸克的价格最高为 17.4 SATS,折算成每张(即 2 万枚夸克)的价值为 0.00348 BTC,约为 139 美元,相较于一级铸造的平均成本,最高涨幅 450% ,目前价格为 8.73 SATS。夸克的持币地址高达 14181 ,为 ARC-20 资产中持币地址最多的代币。

盘点ARC-20热门资产:QUARK及SOPHON

夸克二级市场

二级市场购买链接:https://atomicalmarket.com/market/token/quark

SOPHON:每张需锁仓 10 万聪 BTC

简介

智子(SOPHON)与夸克不同。简而言之,每挖一张智子都需要锁定 10 万聪的 BTC,假设当前 BTC 价格为每枚 40000 美元,那么需要锁定相当于 40 美元价值的 BTC,并额外支付一笔 Gas 费用。考虑到智子的总量为 42 万张,根据挖智子的规则,全部智子挖完相对于锁仓 420 枚 BTC。

根据铸造智子的几天来看,除了每张智子必须锁定的 10 万聪 BTC 外,Gas 成本大约在 5 到 7 美元之间。因此,即便智子归零,本体依然价值 0.001 BTC。实际上,铸造或购买智子相当于以另一种形式储存 BTC。如果对未来市场看好,持有智子可能是一个不错的选择。

盘点ARC-20热门资产:QUARK及SOPHON

智子铸造时

在二级市场方面,智子的主要成交价格维持在 1.16 SATS 至 1.2 SATS 之间,折算成每张(即 10 万枚智子) 的价值约为 0.00116 BTC 至 0.0012 BTC,相当于 46.5 到 48 美元。24 小时交易量方面,智子目前仅次于 ATOM,为 2.35 BTC(约 9.4 万美元)。持币地址方面,智子目前仅次于夸克,为 7474 。因此,从二级市场表现来看,虽然持币地址多、交易量大,但是智子相较于一级铸造并没有明显的涨幅。

盘点ARC-20热门资产:QUARK及SOPHON

智子二级市场

二级市场购买链接:https://atomicalmarket.com/market/token/sophon

综述

对于 ARC-20 资产,社区普遍期待两个可能落地的利好:一是 OKX Web3 钱包会上线 ARC-20 市场;二是币安钱包若推出铭文市场,那么 ARC-20 也可能会同步推出。若利好兑现,夸克与智子将有机会成为 ARC-20 板块的焦点,或许会有一个不错的投资回报率。

Пов'язані матеріали

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

Behind the AI scorecards that dominate industry discussions—benchmarks like MMLU-Pro, MMMU, and MMMU-Pro—stands a Chinese-Canadian researcher: Wenhu Chen. As an assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of the TIGER Lab, Chen has become a key "exam-setter" for evaluating large language and multimodal models. Chen first gained broader recognition with MMLU-Pro, a more challenging and stable update to the popular MMLU benchmark. As top models like OpenAI’s o3 began achieving near-perfect scores on the original MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. MMLU-Pro introduced more complex reasoning questions, expanded answer choices, and filtered out ambiguous or simple items, effectively reintroducing differentiation among state-of-the-art models. His work on MMMU addressed the evaluation of multimodal models, requiring them to integrate visual information (like charts, diagrams, or tables) with textual knowledge across diverse academic subjects. Even the strongest models initially scored only around 56-59%, highlighting significant room for improvement in genuine multimodal reasoning. MMMU-Pro further refined this by preventing models from bypassing visual cues. Chen’s research focus has long been on complex information understanding and reasoning. His background—including a PhD at UC Santa Barbara, research at Google/DeepMind on Gemini, and now a role in Meta’s superintelligence lab—provides deep insight into model development and their potential weaknesses. His TIGER Lab also builds models (e.g., for video understanding and generation), ensuring his evaluation benchmarks are grounded in practical challenges. While AI headlines often spotlight company leaders and product launches, Chen’s work exemplifies the critical, behind-the-scenes contributions of researchers crafting the rigorous standards that define and drive progress in AI capabilities.

marsbit29 хв тому

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

marsbit29 хв тому

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

STRC, the perpetual preferred stock of MicroStrategy, is experiencing a persistent de-pegging from its target par value of $100, with the discount recently widening to over 11%. This de-anchoring challenges the core design of STRC, which was intended as a stable, income-oriented security operating near $100. As a crucial funding engine for MicroStrategy's Bitcoin acquisition strategy, STRC's price reflects market confidence in the company's entire capital model. The company's "capital flywheel" relies on issuing STRC at or above $100 via an At-the-Market (ATM) program to raise cash for buying Bitcoin, thereby boosting company equity and theoretically supporting STRC's value. A monthly adjustable dividend mechanism was designed to maintain this peg. Despite raising the dividend to 11.5% and increasing payment frequency, the de-pegging persists. Market concerns extend beyond technical factors like leveraged arbitrage unwinding. Analysts point to MicroStrategy's limited cash reserves relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation for preferred shares. While the company counters that its vast Bitcoin holdings could cover decades of payments, this argument hinges on the potential need to sell Bitcoin—a shift from its longstanding "hodl" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of BTC, framed as a test, amplified these liquidity and strategy concerns. If STRC remains discounted, impairing MicroStrategy's ability to raise cheap capital, fears may grow that the company could sell more Bitcoin to meet obligations. This scenario could transform MicroStrategy from a major market buyer into a potential seller, posing significant downside risk for Bitcoin. The re-pegging of STRC is thus a key indicator for the health of MicroStrategy's capital structure and its market impact.

Odaily星球日报43 хв тому

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

Odaily星球日报43 хв тому

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

Silicon Valley's New Most Wanted Job: The Rise of the Forward Deployment Engineer The AI industry is witnessing a significant shift. The focus has moved from developing cutting-edge models to deploying them effectively within enterprises. This has made the "Forward Deployment Engineer" (FDE) a critical and highly sought-after role at major firms like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. For the past three years, the industry prioritized model scientists. However, companies are now facing a harsh reality: purchasing powerful AI tools does not guarantee productivity gains or organizational change. The biggest hurdle is not the technology itself, but integrating it into complex legacy systems, workflows, and corporate cultures. This includes challenges like data silos, compliance requirements, and internal resistance. The FDE role, pioneered by Palantir Technologies, addresses this "last-mile" problem. FDEs are deployed on-site with clients for extended periods. Their job is to deeply understand the client's specific organizational structure, processes, and pain points, then tailor and implement the AI solution accordingly. They combine skills in technology, project management, and organizational change. A clear signal of this trend emerged in May 2026 when three AI giants made major moves. Anthropic launched a $1.5B joint venture for enterprise deployment. OpenAI formed an independent deployment subsidiary, DeployCo, with over $4B in commitments and acquired a deployment consultancy. Google Cloud's CEO publicly announced a large-scale recruitment drive for FDEs. This shift represents a fundamental change in the software business model: from selling tools to selling guaranteed outcomes. FDEs are the agents of this change, responsible for delivering a working system within the production environment, not just a demo. Real-world cases, such as challenges at Goldman Sachs (compliance barriers) and Target (internal cultural resistance), illustrate that the primary obstacles to AI adoption are organizational, not technical. An FDE's value lies in navigating these human and procedural complexities to facilitate a successful "AI migration." In essence, as core AI technology becomes more accessible and affordable, the true premium is shifting to the human expertise required to understand organizations and drive change—making the FDE role pivotal for the next phase of the AI revolution.

marsbit43 хв тому

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

marsbit43 хв тому

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

World Cup as a Catalyst for Agentic Wallets: From Web2 to Web3 This article explores how the World Cup provides a real-world scenario for observing the evolution of digital wallets from simple asset managers towards "Agentic Wallets"—intelligent, AI-powered interfaces. Using the example of prediction markets like Polymarket, it illustrates how AI Agents can lower the barrier to Web3 interaction. Instead of navigating complex DApps, users can express intent in natural language (e.g., "I think Portugal will win") within platforms like Discord or web pages. The Agent then interprets this intent, finds the relevant market, and seamlessly guides the user through the on-chain transaction via their wallet. The core shift is from wallets as mere "function menus" for signing transactions to "intent interpreters" that understand user goals. The article highlights parallel developments in traditional finance, such as Mastercard's "Agent Pay" and WeChat Pay's AI tests, which focus on granting AI controlled, authorized, and auditable payment capabilities. This underscores a broader trend of AI entering the financial layer. However, the article emphasizes that the primary challenge for Agentic Wallets in Web3 is not automation but establishing clear security boundaries. Unlike traditional systems with chargebacks, on-chain transactions are often irreversible. Therefore, future wallets must ensure users retain ultimate control and comprehension. They need to transparently communicate an Agent's permissions, spending limits, authorized durations, and provide easy ways to pause or revoke access. The World Cup experiments represent early steps toward wallets that are not just applications but ubiquitous, intelligent interfaces that simplify Web3 while keeping users securely in control.

marsbit2 год тому

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

marsbit2 год тому

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

For years, the prevailing view has been that options struggle to gain traction in DeFi due to complexity, fragmented liquidity, and lack of natural demand compared to products like perpetual futures. However, a recent algorithmic stablecoin design proposed by Vitalik Buterin presents a different perspective, using options not as a standalone trading product, but as foundational infrastructure for other financial instruments. In this design, one unit of ETH is split into two components: a "stable" side (P) that retains value up to a specified strike price, and an "upside" side (N) that captures all appreciation above that strike. Combined, they always equal one ETH, eliminating debt, margin, and liquidation risks inherent in typical collateralized debt position (CDP) stablecoins. The stable component essentially mimics the payoff of a covered call option. To function as a stablecoin, this structure requires continuously rolling deep in-the-money calls, which introduces challenges like rollover slippage, predictable transaction flow vulnerable to front-running, and persistent liquidity needs. A core hurdle is finding consistent buyers for the leveraged ETH upside exposure (N). While it offers leverage without funding rates or liquidation, it must compete with simpler alternatives like direct call options or perpetuals. The system's scalability depends on a sustained demand for this specific form of leverage. The author draws parallels to their experience with Rysk, where earlier versions of DeFi options protocols struggled. The breakthrough came with Rysk V12, which aligns incentives: asset holders generate yield by selling covered calls against their holdings, while market makers efficiently acquire the desired option exposure. This demonstrates that options can find product-market fit when embedded as a risk distribution and pricing engine within structured products, stablecoins, or yield-generating assets, rather than marketed as a complex direct trading instrument. Vitalik's proposal reinforces this architectural approach—using fully collateralized, non-custodial, and physically settled options as a fundamental building block. The real opportunity for options in DeFi may lie not in becoming the next perpetual swap, but in powering the next generation of on-chain financial products.

marsbit2 год тому

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片