SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231212):数字货币价格回稳,前端IV走跌

Odaily星球日报Опубліковано о 2023-12-12Востаннє оновлено о 2023-12-12

Анотація

数字货币方面,BTC再度下跌挑战40000美元关口,于亚盘开始之前收复失地,回到42000下方震荡,隐含波动率也在波动平息之后逐步调整回归。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231212):数字货币价格回稳,前端IV走跌

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231212):数字货币价格回稳,前端IV走跌

昨日(11 Dec)美债收益率在 10 年期美债标售后回吐日内涨幅并持续下跌,十年期收益率跌破 4.2% 关口,报 4.192% ,对政策较为敏感的两年期美债也来到 4.7 以下,现报 4.683% 。美国三大股指小幅上涨,纳指/SP 500/道指分别收涨 0.2% /0.39% /0.4% 。今晚 21: 30 (UTC+ 8)将迎来 CPI 数据,为宏观周正式拉开序幕。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231212):数字货币价格回稳,前端IV走跌

Source: SignalPlus, Economic Calendar

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231212):数字货币价格回稳,前端IV走跌

Source: SignalPlus & TradingView

数字货币方面,BTC 再度下跌挑战 40000 美元关口,于亚盘开始之前收复失地,回到 42000 下方震荡。隐含波动率也在波动平息之后逐步调整回归,BTC/ETH 中前端分别维持在 48% /51% 左右的水平附近,曲线形状以年底为分界点呈现前平后陡的形状。交易方面,BTC 短期限上较为活跃,十二月上的 40000-P 延续了昨日的买入,同时,作为前段时间的阻力位, 15 Dec 23 44000 行权价上的看涨期权也遭到大量抛售;另一方面,在价格回调并暂时恢复稳定之时,大宗上的 Long Call Spread 交易也有所回归,其中 BTC 的大单多集中在 12 月附近,而 ETH 则是偏向更远的明年一二月份。

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231212):数字货币价格回稳,前端IV走跌

Source: Deribit (截至 1 2D EC 16: 00 UTC+ 8)

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231212):数字货币价格回稳,前端IV走跌

Source: SignalPlus

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231212):数字货币价格回稳,前端IV走跌

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231212):数字货币价格回稳,前端IV走跌

Source: Deribit Block Trade

SignalPlus波动率专栏(20231212):数字货币价格回稳,前端IV走跌

您可在 ChatGPT 4.0 的 Plugin Store 搜索 SignalPlus ,获取实时加密资讯。如果想即时收到我们的更新,欢迎关注我们的推特账号@SignalPlus_Web3 ,或者加入我们的微信群(添加小助手微信:xdengalin)、Telegram 群以及 Discord 社群,和更多朋友一起交流互动。

SignalPlus Official Website:https://www.signalplus.com

Пов'язані матеріали

Following the KelpDAO Hack: $40 Billion in Assets Flee LayerZero, Chainlink Emerges as the Primary 'Beneficiary'

Following a major security breach in April where KelpDAO's bridge using LayerZero was attacked for approximately $292 million, a significant shift is underway in the cross-chain infrastructure landscape. An estimated $40 billion in assets is in the process of migrating or has already migrated from LayerZero to Chainlink's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP). The attack exploited a single-point-of-failure vulnerability due to KelpDAO's 1-of-1 validator configuration within the LayerZero network. Attackers corrupted RPC nodes and used DDoS attacks to force the system to rely on compromised nodes, allowing fraudulent messages. While LayerZero acknowledged a serious error in allowing its validator network to service high-value transactions with such a configuration, the incident highlighted critical security risks. This triggered a rapid migration wave. Starting with KelpDAO on May 6th, several major protocols—including Solv Protocol, Re, Tydro, Kraken, and Lombard—announced switching their cross-chain infrastructure exclusively to Chainlink CCIP. The combined value of these migrations is estimated to be around $40 billion. This movement followed earlier major adoptions by Coinbase (in late 2025) and Circle (in early 2024). Market sentiment reflected this shift, with LINK's price showing relative stability while ZRO (LayerZero's token) declined significantly. Data indicates a net outflow of approximately $20.1 billion from the LayerZero network over 30 days. The migration is largely driven by perceived security differences. Chainlink CCIP employs a decentralized oracle network as its default consensus layer, featuring multiple independent node operators, a separate Risk Management Network, and built-in safeguards like rate limits. In contrast, LayerZero's highly modular architecture offers flexibility but places more responsibility on application developers to configure security settings, a risk underscored by the KelpDAO incident. LayerZero has since apologized for its communication handling post-attack and stated the protocol itself was not compromised, but rather its Labs DVN's internal RPC was poisoned. An official post-mortem report with external security partners is forthcoming.

marsbit42 хв тому

Following the KelpDAO Hack: $40 Billion in Assets Flee LayerZero, Chainlink Emerges as the Primary 'Beneficiary'

marsbit42 хв тому

Making AI Products Is No Longer the Hard Part; Being Seen Is: Developers, Web3, and Chinese AI Opportunities at mu Shanghai

The article discusses the shifting challenges of AI entrepreneurship, based on insights from the mu Shanghai AI WEEK event in May 2026. As AI tools drastically lower the barrier to creating product prototypes, the core difficulty for startups has moved from "how to build" to "who to build for"—finding real users, sustainable business models, and community engagement. The event itself was structured as an extended, immersive developer community space rather than a traditional conference, attracting a global mix of participants (40% AI, 20-30% Web3). This format emphasized deep networking and collaborative creation over one-way presentations. A key observation is that with powerful models and coding assistants becoming ubiquitous, execution is less of a moat. The new scarce resource is judgment—identifying valuable, defensible scenarios where an application won't be quickly rendered obsolete by the next model update. This pushes competition downstream to distribution, user acquisition, and commercialization. Notably, many Web3 practitioners are migrating into AI, bringing with them expertise in community building, global collaboration, and grassroots marketing—skills highly relevant as AI apps fight for visibility. Meanwhile, opportunities in AI hardware, robotics, and embodied intelligence are seen as more durable, leveraging China's robust manufacturing and supply chain ecosystem as a key advantage. The article notes that major Chinese model companies (like MiniMax) are now actively competing for developer mindshare through community programs, hackathons, and improved tooling, recognizing developers as core users. Ultimately, the conclusion is that while AI simplifies building, the harder part of the journey is ensuring a product is truly needed, understood, and retained by its users.

marsbit1 год тому

Making AI Products Is No Longer the Hard Part; Being Seen Is: Developers, Web3, and Chinese AI Opportunities at mu Shanghai

marsbit1 год тому

Why is the RWA Boom Failing to Benefit DeFi?

The rapid growth of the tokenized real-world assets (RWA) market, now nearing $30 billion on-chain, has largely bypassed the DeFi ecosystem. Only about $2.47 billion is actively locked in DeFi protocols, indicating a penetration rate of just 9%. A major barrier is the "permissioned" architecture of most RWA products, like BlackRock's BUIDL fund, which are designed for institutional compliance. They require whitelisting, off-chain settlement, and strict investor accreditation, making them incompatible with open, permissionless DeFi applications like Aave or Uniswap. This is evident in categories like bonds/money market funds ($16.6B on-chain, $920M in DeFi) and tokenized equities ($2.7B on-chain, $78M in DeFi). Notable exceptions are private credit protocols (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge) and assets like Ondo's USDY, which were designed from inception for DeFi composability, allowing them to be used freely as collateral. Morpho and Aave Horizon also demonstrate successful RWA lending integrations. However, industry reports (IOSCO, ECB) warn that growth may remain confined within traditional financial systems due to fragmented regulations, lack of unified standards, and inherent conflicts between DeFi's open logic and compliance requirements like minimum investments and fixed redemption windows. The RWA sector is effectively split into two markets: a compliant, permissioned on-chain finance market and a smaller DeFi-native market focused on composability. For DeFi penetration to rise significantly, asset issuers must prioritize designs that enable permissionless circulation from the start, moving away from models centered solely on institutional compliance.

marsbit1 год тому

Why is the RWA Boom Failing to Benefit DeFi?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片