Basel Committee Seeks to Consult on Stablecoins Risk Treatment

CoinDeskPolicyОпубліковано о 2023-12-06Востаннє оновлено о 2023-12-07

Анотація

Regulators have been looking to regulate crypto and mitigate against the risks posed by banks exposure to crypto.

The Basel Committee, a global standard-setter for banks, has said it plans to consult on potential revisions to its criteria for stablecoins on Thursday.

The news came after the committee took stock of its review of elements of the prudential standard for banks' exposure to crypto that it published in December last year.

8.3K

Regulators have been looking to regulate crypto and mitigate against the risks posed by banks exposure to crypto. Recently Silvergate Bank and Silicon Valley Bank – which had links with crypto – collapsed, causing regulators to more closely scrutinize bank involvement with crypto.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Basel Committee wants to consult on the criteria for stablecoins to receive group 1b regulatory treatment, referring to "cryptoassets with effective stabilization mechanisms," it said.

The initial December report separated its criteria for the treatment of crypto into two groups. Group one cryptos would meet the full set of classification conditions and would be subject to capital requirements. Group two cryptocurrencies that do not meet classification conditions, and so needs newly prescribed capital treatment.

"The committee concluded that crypto assets that use permissionless blockchains create risks that cannot be sufficiently mitigated at present and therefore agreed to retain the existing treatment for such cryptoassets," the report said.

It also agreed to continue to monitor the evolution of banks crypto custody activities and consider if additional work needs to be done.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.



Пов'язані матеріали

Robinhood Chain's DeFi Long March: Replicating the Ethereum Classic, Reshaping the RWA Financial Landscape

Robinhood Chain is evolving from a primary hub for meme coins into a diversified DeFi ecosystem. Core DeFi primitives—AMM, CLOB, lending, perpetual contracts, ve(3,3), and OHM-style protocols—are being deployed and adapted for new assets, particularly tokenized stocks and RWAs. Key developments include Uniswap (V2/V3/V4) dominating as the core AMM and liquidity layer, with V4 enabling programmable pools. Deepstate introduces a fully on-chain order book (CLOB) model for efficient price discovery, suited for traditional assets. Lending protocols like Morpho and Arrow Finance allow users to earn yield on stablecoins and use tokenized stocks as collateral for loans. Perpetual DEXs like Lighter and Arcus support crypto and tokenized stocks as both trading pairs and margin collateral, with Arcus further tokenizing positions for DeFi composability. The ve(3,3) model is implemented by protocols like UponRH, which ties token emissions to actual trading fees, and Fables, which uses Uniswap V4 hooks for dynamic fee markets tailored to RWAs. NetNet offers an OHM-style reserve currency protocol with code-enforced parameters and a Risk-Free Value (RFV) backed by stable assets. The overarching trend is the growing composability of traditional financial assets (like stocks) within Robinhood Chain's DeFi landscape, moving beyond mere replication of existing models to create tailored financial infrastructure for RWAs.

marsbit43 хв тому

Robinhood Chain's DeFi Long March: Replicating the Ethereum Classic, Reshaping the RWA Financial Landscape

marsbit43 хв тому

The Battle for Control of the Tracks Enters the Second Half: Banks vs. Crypto, Who Will Have the Last Laugh?

The competition for control over the tokenization infrastructure, or the "rails," is intensifying, moving beyond initial asset listing to dominance over settlement, custody, and regulatory layers. Recent developments signal a shift in power towards traditional finance. Key evidence includes: the formation of the BankChain Alliance by 39 U.S. state banking associations to launch a banking-owned blockchain network; moves by market infrastructure giants like DTCC, ICE, and Citadel Securities to establish their own institutional-grade on-chain systems; the struggle of crypto-native custodians like ZeroHash (re-applying for a bank charter) and Copper (facing a severe valuation drop), highlighting that regulatory "license moats" are now more critical than technical advantages; and the launch of stablecoin USD1 by licensed trust bank BitGo on the permissioned Canton network, showing convergence of stablecoin issuance towards regulated entities. The analysis concludes this is not a simple "banks vs. crypto" battle but a redefinition of the foundational infrastructure. A clear division of labor is emerging: open public chains for DeFi and innovation, while bank-led consortium chains and licensed entities capture institutional settlement, tokenized deposits, and regulated custody. The defining question is no longer *if* an asset is tokenized, but *on which rails* it runs and *who controls* those rails, with regulation and牌照 providing the ultimate backstop.

marsbit1 год тому

The Battle for Control of the Tracks Enters the Second Half: Banks vs. Crypto, Who Will Have the Last Laugh?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片