稳定币之争:Terra 计划如何赢得这场与 MakerDAO 的“战争”

BanklessОпубліковано о 2022-04-11Востаннє оновлено о 2022-04-11

Анотація

对稳定币实力的更艰巨的考验将来自其对市场冲击、中心化和监管的抵御能力。

稳定币市值目前占据加密货币总市值的 10%以上 ,如果不包括 ETH 和 BTC的话,其占比将接近 25%。
为什么它们如此受到欢迎?

  • *波动率几乎接近于零
  • *很容易桥接到 TradFi
  • *是较为复杂的金融产品的基本构建模块
  • *广为人知的资本转移和储值的方法

稳定币是现实世界中具有产品市场契合度的案例。
而且它们之间正在酝酿一场战斗,这将是一场史诗般的市场份额争夺战。
市场份额之战
与 DeFi 中发生的许多事情一样,故事还要从流动性开始说起。
稳定币一向以一种明显或是隐含的方式深深地植根在每一个 DeFi 协议中。这意味着对稳定币深度流动性有很强烈的需求,也就是说能够定期转移数百万美元时不会出现滑点的状况。
Curve
Curve 3pool 是一个重要的 DeFi 构建模块。它是一个由 DAI、USDC 和 UDST 组成的稳定币流动性池,并拥有超过 30 亿的总锁仓价值。甚至其他一些稳定币也在使用 3pool 作为常用的基础交易对,FRAX -3CRV 就是其中一个例子。
作为最大的稳定币 Curve 池,3pool 享有大量 CRV 释放带来的好处,使其成为低风险的赚取稳定币收益的好地方,并进一步增加了流动性的深度,从而巩固了 3pool 在 DeFi 堆栈中的地位。
3pool 如此看来无懈可击。
这也是为什么 Do Kwon 宣布了新的 4pool之后令该行业感到意外的原因。
4pool 由 USDT、USDC、UST 和 FRAX 组成,旨在与 3pool 竞争。
通过合并 CVX 持有的资产,Terra、Frax Finance 和 Cartel 组成的联盟打算将释放的 CRV 转移到 4pool,并有效地较少 3pool 供应,并促使 LP 出于回报的原因,将资金存入 4pool。
值得注意的是,出于战略原因,在这个池子里还没有 DAI。
这是一种经典的战时策略——分而治之。
稳定币市场
去年,我们见证了稳定币的寒武纪爆发,特别是一些围绕算法稳定币的尝试。
目前已有超过 7 个稳定币的市值高过 10 亿美元,其竞争很激烈。今天,DAI 占据所有非法定抵押稳定币的 27.6%,而 UST 以 52% 的占比遥遥领先。

稳定币

最近,Terra 一直在采取重大举措来保护 UST 的挂钩。
3 月中旬,Terra 开始实施计划,购买了 100 亿美元比特币作为支持 UST 的储备金,除了两天前购买了 1 亿美元的 AVAX 之外,本周其又增持了 2.31 亿美元。
尽管有许多人对 UST 的长期安全性和去中心化前景持有怀疑态度,但不可否认这是一个精明的战时举措。通过用 BTC 和 AVAX 支持 UST, 可以在 Terra 与比特币及 Avalanche 社区之间建立联盟,从而激励更多人来采用。争夺市场份额仍然是 UST 当前的第一目标。
看到 UST 的成功之后,其他链也逐渐加入了竞争之列。本周 NEAR 协议宣布计划推出自己的 NEAR 支持的算法稳定币。我们接下来希望看到很多人可以效仿跟进。
与此同时,MakerDAO 并没有满足于现状。MakerDAO 一直奉行将其抵押品储备多元化的分散到现实世界资产的战略,并通过链下世界为 DAI 注入更多实用性。
本周,特斯拉与 MakerDAO 达成了780 万美元的融资协议,后者为特斯拉的维修设施提供了信贷额度。
谁是最后的赢家?
现在说还为时过早。
获得市场份额是对稳定币实力的一项重大考验。但更艰巨的考验将来自其对市场冲击、中心化和监管的抵御能力。
我们真的可以说这些新的稳定币中的任何一个都通过了这些考验吗?

Пов'язані матеріали

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

A founder at an energy investment forum advises bitcoin miners not to purchase GPUs for AI themselves, but to instead focus on infrastructure like power and data center space. Mike Alfred of Alpine Fox stated that while AI infrastructure demand is a long-term, 20-30 year trend, it presents a key choice for miners. The first, riskier model involves owning and operating GPUs, which requires financing expensive hardware that quickly becomes obsolete. The second, more conservative model is akin to real estate: providing colocation services where clients bring their own servers, and the miner sells space, power, cooling, and water. Alfred noted this model is easier to finance. Most existing bitcoin mining sites are difficult and expensive to convert for AI, as AI data centers require far higher construction costs, redundant fiber connections, backup power, complex cooling, and near 100% uptime. A hybrid model, where mining acts as a flexible load to use excess power during AI data center construction or from generation facilities, was discussed. However, participants concluded this is only viable with very cheap power; otherwise, developers are better off focusing solely on AI. Miners are increasingly being evaluated for their available power capacity and project portfolios rather than just bitcoin output. Panelists also warned of risks in the AI sector, predicting at least one major default or contract breach among AI tenants, lenders, or landlords before bitcoin's next halving in 2028.

cryptonews.ru3 хв тому

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

cryptonews.ru3 хв тому

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

"Millisecond 'Paid Queue-Jumping': How Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Became a Multi-Million Dollar Annual Business" In traditional finance, high-frequency trading firms spend millions on infrastructure for millisecond advantages. Hyperliquid has translated this race onto the blockchain with its "Priority Fee" system, creating an open economic game for speed. This system auctions two types of priority: **Gossip Priority** for faster data feeds (via a Dutch auction every 3 minutes), and **Order Priority** for front-of-queue trade execution (users bid a fee for lower latency). This converts a hardware race into a transparent, market-priced mechanism. Since launch, this feature has generated over $5M in protocol revenue. Projected annualized buybacks from this income exceed $30M, accounting for ~7% of total protocol revenue. The demand stems from large traders and market makers on Hyperliquid, for whom milliseconds can mean the difference between profit/loss or avoiding liquidation. Market makers pay these fees as "protection" to ensure their orders execute first, which in turn improves liquidity for all users. Crucially, Hyperliquid internalizes Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) that typically leaks to external validators or searchers, creating a new revenue stream beyond trading fees. The mechanism also strengthens HYPE's tokenomics. While 97% of trading fees fund secondary market buybacks (via the Assistance Fund), Priority Fees are **directly burned**, adding a second deflationary engine. Furthermore, fees for order priority are deducted from users' undelegated HYPE balances, encouraging large traders to hold and lock up tokens, reducing circulating supply. However, a key challenge remains: balancing the speed needs of institutional players with fair market access for retail users, as those who cannot pay high fees may suffer worse slippage during volatility. In summary, Hyperliquid's Priority Fee is a novel model that monetizes latency, captures MEV for the protocol, and enhances its native token's value through burning and lock-ups.

marsbit8 хв тому

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

marsbit8 хв тому

The Truth Behind Digital Banking: The Fragile Ecosystem Supporting 1.46 Billion Users

The article "The Truth About Digital Banks: The Fragile Ecosystem Behind 1.46 Billion Users" provides a data-driven analysis of the digital banking sector based on a verified list of 368 active neobanks as of July 2026. While these platforms collectively serve 1.46 billion users, with Asia (817 million users) and institutions like WeBank and Nubank dominating the landscape, the sector faces significant structural vulnerabilities. A key finding is that only 127 of the 368 neobanks hold full banking licenses. The majority operate atop third-party infrastructure providers like Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) platforms, creating systemic risk where the failure of a single provider, as seen in past cases like Wirecard and Synapse, can jeopardize multiple consumer brands. Furthermore, the industry experiences a steady, quiet stream of failures, mergers, and shutdowns that often go unreported. The analysis also examines the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), finding only 67 platforms (18%) have deployed AI at scale, with many innovators based in emerging markets like Nigeria and the Philippines. The infrastructure layer is highly concentrated, with 106 providers supporting the entire ecosystem of 368 consumer-facing brands. The article concludes with three predictions: the unlicensed gap will close through acquisitions or exits; an AI credit model is likely to fail in the next economic downturn; and a nascent but significant trend is the emergence of financial services designed for AI agents rather than humans.

marsbit23 хв тому

The Truth Behind Digital Banking: The Fragile Ecosystem Supporting 1.46 Billion Users

marsbit23 хв тому

Digital Asset Trading Platform Uphold Cuts 17% of Global Workforce Amid 'Crypto Winter'

Cryptocurrency trading platform Uphold has laid off approximately 17% of its global workforce, affecting 85 full-time employees and contractors. The cuts are part of a strategic shift to reallocate resources towards its rapidly growing corporate services business, as retail cryptocurrency trading activity has declined amid the ongoing market downturn. CEO Simon McLaughlin stated the company is restructuring after years of significant growth and remains confident in the long-term prospects of digital assets and blockchain technology. Founded in 2015, Uphold offers trading and custody services for cryptocurrencies, fiat, stocks, and precious metals. It has recently expanded to provide infrastructure for banks, fintech firms, and broker-dealers to integrate crypto services. The layoffs occur against a backdrop of a prolonged crypto market slump, with total market capitalization falling to around $2.1 trillion by Q2 2024. Factors include weakened trading volumes, reduced retail participation, interest rate hikes, geopolitical uncertainty, and net outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. Uphold clarified it is not shutting down its UK operations or any international offices. The company highlighted strong growth in its corporate platform and announced plans to evolve its consumer app into a broader blockchain-based financial assistant by 2026, offering U.S. stocks, tokenized securities, lending, credit cards, and DeFi yield opportunities.

cryptonews.ru23 хв тому

Digital Asset Trading Platform Uphold Cuts 17% of Global Workforce Amid 'Crypto Winter'

cryptonews.ru23 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片