长推:BTC Stamps NFT 超详细图文攻略

MarsBitОпубліковано о 2023-05-23Востаннє оновлено о 2023-05-23

Анотація

如何查询所mint SRC-20的有效性? 等交易确认后(自己发送的只是转到分发器,需要等分发器验证后再发起交易给自己的钱包,一般1-24小时到账不等) 进入如下网站,填写地址可以查看钱包内的stamp NFT(包括SRC-20) https://stampchain.io

注:原文来自@DaMian2848发布长推。

本线程将从以下几个方面剖析STAMP协议 & SRC-20协议生态:

1)Stamp协议与SRC-20协议是?

2)如何购买一个有价值且经验证的Stamp NFT?

3)有价值的SRC-20有哪些?如何mint?如何看余量?

4)个人观点与项目推荐(DYOR)

5)番外/资料

1)Stamp协议与SRC-20协议是什么?

BTC Stamps协议由@mikeinspace提出,BTC Stamps 的实现机制为将base64 格式的图像数据嵌入到比特币链上的交易输出之中,从而永久地在比特币链上保存相应的图片数据。

你可以在他提交的github中获得对Stamps协议的详细信息:

SRC-20协议是在3月BRC-20生态爆发之际,mike参照BRC-20范本所创建的,并于5月17日更新至SRC-21,大幅降低了单次mint的gas费(80u → 30u),并对获取项目余量的API进行了优化。

你可以在他提交的github中获得对SRC-20协议的详细信息:

与ordinals序数协议的区别? Stamp邮票协议与ordinals序数协议之争在比特币开发论坛已经进行了有些时日了。 ordinals繁荣之际,在比特币核心开发论坛上,多位核心开发并不希望在btc交易中嵌入如此多“没有价值的”垃圾信息,并有过拒绝签署此类交易的争论,矿工有拒绝同步此类交易的权利。

基于此争论,mike提出了Stamps协议,旨在使用Counterparty协议将整段文本内容广播到比特币链上,并利用base64编码机制及“stamp:”前缀使相应Counterparty交易识别为P2SH类型的交易,该类型交易需要将数据分拆并嵌入至多笔交易输出之中,且无法被比特币全节点“删除”,从而就实现了对图片数据的永久保存。

BTC Stamps邮票协议相较于Ordinals序数协议最大的优势在于,其数据保存基于最简单的交易输出完成,因此比特币全节点们“别无选择”,只能选择去保存BTC Stamps,而OP_RETURN 和“见证数据”(Ordinals 采用的方案)则存在被全节点“删减”的可能性。 这也是SRC-20比BRC-20交易有效性确认更长的原因。

以下是截取自币安关于BRC20的研究中第21页的叙述: SRC-20令牌存储的数据的方式与 BRC-20令牌不同,这可能使SRC-20令牌在技术规范上比 BRC-20令牌更加安全,但可存储的数据并没有BRC-20那么丰富。

2)如何购买一个有价值且经验证的Stamp NFT?

Stamp NFT大多都依然属于早期阶段,其不可修改,永久保存的属性更引人瞩目。

mike参与开发的NFT交易平台(类似 http://ordswap.io )

http://rarestamp.xyz

该平台经验证的就只有以下三个系列: @the_pixel_gods ,像素之神、像素守卫、像素仆人三个系列。 3GGS,蛋蛋系列,暂未找到项目方。 EnterAI,平台官方@Universelle_io推出的类似OG系列卡,据说会有赋能,价格也从0.003B涨到0.13至0.3B。 还有类似于4#的Punks、巫师、青蛙等也都属于早期阶段。

那么该如何在rarestamp上购买一个NFT呢? 以官方OG系列为例:

①进入藏品详情页

②掌握这个系列NFT的信息

③点击付款 注意:千万不要用bc1p开头的地址向分发器打款,不然无法找回。

3)有价值的SRC-20有哪些?如何mint?如何看余量?如何查询有效性?

官方SRC-20 mint网站:https://stampchain.io/src20/

实验文档: https://github.com/hydren-crypto/stampchain/blob/main/docs/src20.md…

代打网站: https://rarestamp.xyz/minting

SRC-20 Dashboard(obi开发,用于查余量): https://crypt0biwan.github.io/src20/

如何mint SRC-20?

如何查询所mint SRC-20的有效性? 等交易确认后(自己发送的只是转到分发器,需要等分发器验证后再发起交易给自己的钱包,一般1-24小时到账不等) 进入如下网站,填写地址可以查看钱包内的stamp NFT(包括SRC-20) https://stampchain.io

拿到上述SRC-20的序号后,前往余量查询面板: https://crypt0biwan.github.io/src20/ 点击相应项目mint旁边的

能看到mint信息,然后下来,寻找最后一条mint满额的记录,查看序号,与自己的序号比对。 可以看到,Stamp的最后一条有效序号为35260,而自己的为40840,则为无效序号,简单说就是打废了。

4)个人观点与项目推荐 ordinals序数协议所推动的BTC变革属于历史趋势,而Stamp邮票协议可能会以其独特的生成机制,和永久保存,矿工无法拒绝等特点成为下一轮热点。这都属于推动BTC生态不断繁荣发展的催化剂。再加上目前BRC20已经被OKX扶持,而作为宇宙第一所的bn极有可能为这个协议背书。

笔者自己接盘的项目(DYOR):

提醒:所有加密货币交易均为极高风险交易,所有交易均可能归零损失本金,仅供参考。

Пов'язані матеріали

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit39 хв тому

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit39 хв тому

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit59 хв тому

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit59 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片