一亿美元的空投盛宴!Gnosis 生态准备崛起了吗?

老雅痞Опубліковано о 2022-03-31Востаннє оновлено о 2022-03-31

Анотація

本周Gnosis(GNO)价格迅速上涨50%以上,主要原因之一便是CowSwap(COW)代币的发布。

本周Gnosis(GNO)价格迅速上涨50%以上,主要原因之一便是CowSwap(COW)代币的发布。该代币总量10亿枚,空投数量占比10%,在撰写此文时代币价格为1.04$,也就是说这是一笔总量价值超1亿美元的大型空投。根据用户反馈,只要在该协议上交互过一次最少也可领取到108个$cow,可以说非常良心了。下面本文将介绍其具体空投标准以及帮助大家在酸柠檬(我也没领到)的同时了解该项目的优势所在还有其所采用的批量拍卖和巧合需求技术。

空投标准:

CoWPOAP:从测试会话、批量拍卖、CowStars或用户研究会话中获得POAP。并不是所有的POAP都同样有价值。其中一些最特别的是CowStars和用户测试参与者。注意,项目方说的是“授予”而不是“拥有”,因为他们知道这些POAPS存在二级市场,所以只考虑获奖者。

超级交易员:超级交易员是指在以太坊主网(区块13974427之前)或Gnosis链(区块20024195)上进行了至少3次交易,在第一次和最后一次交易之间至少14天,并且至少进行了3次交易的人1K总交易量。(注意,稳定币到稳定币的交易仅按因子0.1)

交易者:交易者是指在以太坊主网(区块13974427之前)或Gnosis链(区块20024195)上至少进行过一次交易,总价值为1000美元或至少进行了5次交易的人。(注意,稳定币到稳定币的交易仅按因子0.1)

GNO持有者:GNO持有者是指在以太坊主网(区块13974427之前)或Gnosis链(区块20024195)上持有至少0.1个GNO的人。他们有资格在主网或GnosisChain上持有GNO,并有资格运行GBC验证器。

CoW协议简介

CoW协议是一种完全无需许可的交易协议,它利用批量拍卖作为其价格发现机制。CoW协议除了在需要时利用所有可用的链上流动性外,还允许批量拍卖通过需求巧合(CoWs)最大化流动性。批次拍卖由协议持续运行,因为负责为批次寻找最佳解决方案的解决方正在竞争解决它。获胜的解决者将是通过拥有最佳CoW、找到最佳流动性来源或将两者结合在一个单一结算中来最大化交易者盈余的解决者。

需求巧合(CoWs)是协议中最具创新性的方面之一,但它们到底是什么?CoW是在所有具有匹配限价的订单之间共享流动性的结算。CoW协议不是AMM或CLOB,而是使用批量拍卖作为促进CoW的核心机制。使用批量拍卖可以为个人交易者带来更好的价格,并在汽油费优化和流动性提供者费用方面节省大量资金。此外,由于批量拍卖统一的清算价格和CoW不需要访问链上流动性,CoW协议能够为用户提供任何其他协议无法实现的MEV保护级别。

CowSwap是第一个建立在CoW协议之上的交易界面。它充当MetaDEX聚合器,为用户提供跨聚合器或AMM的最优惠价格,具体取决于哪一个是批次内交易最具流动性的场所。

CoW协议没有使用中央运营商或恒定功能做市商来确定交易结算,而是使用称为求解器的“一方”,即负责为批量拍卖提供结算解决方案的一方。求解器相互竞争以提交最优的批量结算解决方案,每次求解器提交成功的批量结算解决方案时,协议都会用代币奖励他们,这意味着协议奖励求解器解决批量拍卖优化问题。任何人都可以成为解算者,但要成为解算者,有一定的要求:

要成为求解器,以太坊地址需要以代币的形式存入保证金。资产类型和数量有待GnosisDAO或CowDAO定义。

一旦代币被质押(锁定),GnosisDAO/CowDAO必须投票批准或拒绝将识别求解者的以太坊地址。如果投票成功,求解器以太坊地址将被包含在白名单(验证)求解器合约中。

此外,求解器必须具备技术知识来创建适当的批量结算解决方案,否则会冒着被GnosisDAO/CowDAO罚没的风险。

项目优势

完全无需许可的MetaDEX聚合器,任何人都可以在其上交易任何代币并构建集成;

首次实施促进公平统一清算价格的批量拍卖(第二次迭代);

交易受到不同类型的MEV的保护;

可获得所有链上流动性;找到COW时的最佳价格,至少与最佳DEX聚合器价格一样好所有代币对均可交易,链下订单提交实现无gas交易

公平、去中心化的结算,其中订单匹配的公开竞争取代了中央运营商或恒定功能的做市商。

代币经济学确保求解者相互竞争,为交易者提供最佳的订单结算解决方案,以换取每批拍卖的奖励。

批量拍卖

在CoW协议上,订单是在链下下达的,不会立即执行,而是收集和汇总以分批结算。CoW协议通过开放的求解器竞争来代替中央操作员以进行订单匹配,求解器指的是提交批次订单结算解决方案的组件。一旦批次“关闭订单”意味着它不考虑任何新订单,这些求解器就可以竞争以提供与该关闭批次中的订单匹配的优化解决方案。

但是,为什么要使用批量拍卖作为DEX的价格发现机制呢?主要是两个原因:

让以太坊中的DeFi空间有机会在同一区块中建立任何代币对的相同价格。

通过将统一清算价格和需求巧合等新经济机制相结合,改进DEX交易价格提供。

即使以太坊交易在同一个区块内同时以原子方式执行,但由于AMM的设计,在同一个区块上交易相同的代币不会获得不同但相同的交易,相同的价格。这是因为恒定函数做市商(CFMM)的设计不允许在一个区块中同时进行交易。为了让CFMM工作,它需要按顺序处理交易,以便池可以知道其中代币的比例是多少,并根据它执行价格的交易。即使该块将具有相同代币对的多笔交易,但每笔交易将获得不同的价格,具体取决于它们与流动性池进行交易的顺序。因此,交易的顺序变得非常重要。

借助利用批量拍卖的CoW协议,以太坊的交易者现在可以为他们在完全相同的区块交易的相同代币对获得相同的价格。矿工重新排序交易毫无意义,利用批量拍卖的CoW协议,以太坊的交易者现在可以为他们在完全相同的区块交易的相同代币对获得相同的价格。

除了能够为批次内发生的交易建立统一的清算价格外,CoW协议批量拍卖价格发现机制还旨在提供其他CFMM无法提供的更好价格。

巧合需求

CoW协议由于使用了批量拍卖,因此针对在批次内的交易以及环形交易中寻找需求的一致性(CoW)进行了优化。

巧合需求可以解释为“两方各自持有对方想要的物品,因此直接交换这些物品的经济现象。这意味着在CoW协议上,当两个或更多交易时,每个人都持有对方想要的资产,他们的订单可以直接在所有人之间进行结算,无需外部做市商或流动性提供者。CowProtocol可以在二维订单簿中创建CoW,也可以在多维订单簿上创建它们。

使用批量拍卖的优点之一是用户不仅可以找到完美的需求巧合匹配,还可以创建环交易。本质上,环交易在所有订单中共享流动性,而不是单个代币对。此功能允许协议为交易者提供更好的价格,因为他们无需等待交易之间的完美匹配,因为他们可以将交易分解成碎片以改善交易结果。环形交易是解决分散流动性的解决方案之一。

总体而言,通过利用为需求巧合量身定制的批量拍卖,CoW协议能够为交易提供更好的价格,因为批量交易会导致更低的价差,并为用户提供更优化的交易管理。

代币效用

COW代币将赋予其持有者在CowDAO内的投票权。CowDAO的主要目的是管理和管理CoW协议生态系统的基本基础设施组件,包括:

系统参数:CowDAO将负责所有系统参数,例如解决方案评分的目标函数和求解器削减条件。

国库控股和协议收入:国库控股的分配、协议收入的分配和对生态系统项目的投资。

质押:激励CoW协议解决者通过获取参与价值来竞争提供最佳解决方案。这可能以交易费、解决方案代币奖励或两者兼而有之的形式出现。求解者可能需要质押COW才能参与解决方案提交。CoW协议用户将能够锁定COW代币以获得交易费用折扣。这为有利于所有CoW交易的代币提供了切实的效用。

费用和奖励:交易者、求解器、前端、开发人员和其他生态系统参与者应始终保持足够的激励,以继续贡献和维护一个强大的生态系统。激励措施可能以批量解决方案奖励、交易者激励、生态系统赠款等形式出现。

数据分析

根据duneanalytics数据显示,当前CowSwap每日交易量在50M-100M美元幅度波动,交易者数量在500-1k左右波动。交易量和交易额主要集中在低频、小额度之上,与Uniswap等知名去中心化交易所相比还有较大差距。

结语

梳理完本文之后,最大的感受就是在区块链行业要要足够的执行力和勤奋。面对新鲜事物要保持足够好奇心,去探究其存在的意义和所要解决的问题是什么。如同本项目CowSwap,其特色便在于允许用户使用点对点结算,从而实现无gas订单买卖Token,或者在提供MEV保护的同时进入任何链上流动性来源。即使从当前数据上来看仍处于早期阶段,但随着1kx和DelphiVentures等投资机构的入局,或许CowSwap也能凭借其独特的技术方法实现属于自己的Defi王国。

Пов'язані матеріали

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

A founder at an energy investment forum advises bitcoin miners not to purchase GPUs for AI themselves, but to instead focus on infrastructure like power and data center space. Mike Alfred of Alpine Fox stated that while AI infrastructure demand is a long-term, 20-30 year trend, it presents a key choice for miners. The first, riskier model involves owning and operating GPUs, which requires financing expensive hardware that quickly becomes obsolete. The second, more conservative model is akin to real estate: providing colocation services where clients bring their own servers, and the miner sells space, power, cooling, and water. Alfred noted this model is easier to finance. Most existing bitcoin mining sites are difficult and expensive to convert for AI, as AI data centers require far higher construction costs, redundant fiber connections, backup power, complex cooling, and near 100% uptime. A hybrid model, where mining acts as a flexible load to use excess power during AI data center construction or from generation facilities, was discussed. However, participants concluded this is only viable with very cheap power; otherwise, developers are better off focusing solely on AI. Miners are increasingly being evaluated for their available power capacity and project portfolios rather than just bitcoin output. Panelists also warned of risks in the AI sector, predicting at least one major default or contract breach among AI tenants, lenders, or landlords before bitcoin's next halving in 2028.

cryptonews.ru3 хв тому

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

cryptonews.ru3 хв тому

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

"Millisecond 'Paid Queue-Jumping': How Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Became a Multi-Million Dollar Annual Business" In traditional finance, high-frequency trading firms spend millions on infrastructure for millisecond advantages. Hyperliquid has translated this race onto the blockchain with its "Priority Fee" system, creating an open economic game for speed. This system auctions two types of priority: **Gossip Priority** for faster data feeds (via a Dutch auction every 3 minutes), and **Order Priority** for front-of-queue trade execution (users bid a fee for lower latency). This converts a hardware race into a transparent, market-priced mechanism. Since launch, this feature has generated over $5M in protocol revenue. Projected annualized buybacks from this income exceed $30M, accounting for ~7% of total protocol revenue. The demand stems from large traders and market makers on Hyperliquid, for whom milliseconds can mean the difference between profit/loss or avoiding liquidation. Market makers pay these fees as "protection" to ensure their orders execute first, which in turn improves liquidity for all users. Crucially, Hyperliquid internalizes Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) that typically leaks to external validators or searchers, creating a new revenue stream beyond trading fees. The mechanism also strengthens HYPE's tokenomics. While 97% of trading fees fund secondary market buybacks (via the Assistance Fund), Priority Fees are **directly burned**, adding a second deflationary engine. Furthermore, fees for order priority are deducted from users' undelegated HYPE balances, encouraging large traders to hold and lock up tokens, reducing circulating supply. However, a key challenge remains: balancing the speed needs of institutional players with fair market access for retail users, as those who cannot pay high fees may suffer worse slippage during volatility. In summary, Hyperliquid's Priority Fee is a novel model that monetizes latency, captures MEV for the protocol, and enhances its native token's value through burning and lock-ups.

marsbit8 хв тому

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

marsbit8 хв тому

The Truth Behind Digital Banking: The Fragile Ecosystem Supporting 1.46 Billion Users

The article "The Truth About Digital Banks: The Fragile Ecosystem Behind 1.46 Billion Users" provides a data-driven analysis of the digital banking sector based on a verified list of 368 active neobanks as of July 2026. While these platforms collectively serve 1.46 billion users, with Asia (817 million users) and institutions like WeBank and Nubank dominating the landscape, the sector faces significant structural vulnerabilities. A key finding is that only 127 of the 368 neobanks hold full banking licenses. The majority operate atop third-party infrastructure providers like Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) platforms, creating systemic risk where the failure of a single provider, as seen in past cases like Wirecard and Synapse, can jeopardize multiple consumer brands. Furthermore, the industry experiences a steady, quiet stream of failures, mergers, and shutdowns that often go unreported. The analysis also examines the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), finding only 67 platforms (18%) have deployed AI at scale, with many innovators based in emerging markets like Nigeria and the Philippines. The infrastructure layer is highly concentrated, with 106 providers supporting the entire ecosystem of 368 consumer-facing brands. The article concludes with three predictions: the unlicensed gap will close through acquisitions or exits; an AI credit model is likely to fail in the next economic downturn; and a nascent but significant trend is the emergence of financial services designed for AI agents rather than humans.

marsbit23 хв тому

The Truth Behind Digital Banking: The Fragile Ecosystem Supporting 1.46 Billion Users

marsbit23 хв тому

Digital Asset Trading Platform Uphold Cuts 17% of Global Workforce Amid 'Crypto Winter'

Cryptocurrency trading platform Uphold has laid off approximately 17% of its global workforce, affecting 85 full-time employees and contractors. The cuts are part of a strategic shift to reallocate resources towards its rapidly growing corporate services business, as retail cryptocurrency trading activity has declined amid the ongoing market downturn. CEO Simon McLaughlin stated the company is restructuring after years of significant growth and remains confident in the long-term prospects of digital assets and blockchain technology. Founded in 2015, Uphold offers trading and custody services for cryptocurrencies, fiat, stocks, and precious metals. It has recently expanded to provide infrastructure for banks, fintech firms, and broker-dealers to integrate crypto services. The layoffs occur against a backdrop of a prolonged crypto market slump, with total market capitalization falling to around $2.1 trillion by Q2 2024. Factors include weakened trading volumes, reduced retail participation, interest rate hikes, geopolitical uncertainty, and net outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. Uphold clarified it is not shutting down its UK operations or any international offices. The company highlighted strong growth in its corporate platform and announced plans to evolve its consumer app into a broader blockchain-based financial assistant by 2026, offering U.S. stocks, tokenized securities, lending, credit cards, and DeFi yield opportunities.

cryptonews.ru23 хв тому

Digital Asset Trading Platform Uphold Cuts 17% of Global Workforce Amid 'Crypto Winter'

cryptonews.ru23 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片