Which Cryptos Are Best Positioned To Follow The Same Trajectory As Hyperliquid (HYPE)?

bitcoinist2026-06-01 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-06-01 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The article discusses cryptocurrencies that could potentially follow the remarkable trajectory of Hyperliquid (HYPE), which saw its token surge over 60% in a bear market. It identifies two main competitors in the perpetual decentralized exchange (DEX) space: ASTER, the token of the Aster DEX, and LIT from the Lighter DEX. While ASTER has achieved billions in open interest like Hyperliquid, its token price remains around 70% below its all-time high. Similarly, LIT has also fallen more than 66% from its peak despite some trading volume success. The article suggests these significant declines create speculation for potential recovery rallies similar to HYPE's performance. In contrast, Hyperliquid continues to dominate, holding a $17.3 billion market cap and ranking among the top 10 cryptocurrencies. The search is on for the next token that can defy the bear market and replicate such success.

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has managed to break the ceiling on what was thought possible in a crypto bear market. During a time when the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum have struggled to hold up, the perpetual decentralized exchange (DEX) saw its native token price explode by more than 60% in only one month. Following this rise, the hunt seems to be on for the next familiar token that could repeat this trajectory and hit a new all-time high despite the bear market.

ASTER And LIGHTER Are Hyperliquid’s Biggest Crypto Competitors

Following the success of Hyperliquid after its token launch in 2024, competitors quickly followed, making the rounds in the crypto community. So far, the biggest of these cryptos has been ASTER, which is the native token of the Aster decentralized perpetual exchange.

While its growth is still a long way from that of Hyperliquid, ASTER has grown rapidly, with its open interest climbing into the billions. This makes it the only decentralized perpetual exchange besides Hyperliquid that has managed to maintain an open interest in the billions of dollars.

Despite its popularity, though, the ASTER cryptocurrency has not performed as well as expected. Whereas the Hyperliquid price has already rallied to new all-time highs, the ASTER token price is approximately 70% below its $2.4 all-time high that was set back in September 2024. As a result, investors are expecting that the ASTER price could pull a similar stunt to Hyperliquid and rally again.

Coming up behind ASTER is the LIT token, which is the native token of the Lighter decentralized perpetual exchange. While Lighter has seen some success, it has not been able to move into the billions of dollars in open interest like Hyperliquid and ASTER.

For now, it remains in the fourth position when it comes to perpetual decentralized exchanges in terms of open interest. However, in terms of trading volume, it comes third, moving ahead of Variational Omni despite it $959 million in open interest, according to data from the CoinCodex website.

On the price side, Lighter’s LIT token has performed similarly to that of ASTER. The LIT token had seen an initial run-up following its launch, reaching an all-time high of $4. However, it has fallen more than 66% from this peak, giving room for speculation that a recovery rally might be around the corner.

As for Hyperliquid, the token continues to command a tremendous mindshare in the crypto market. At its current price, it boasts an outstanding $17.3 billion market cap, making it the 9th-largest cryptocurrency by market cap, ahead of the likes of Dogecoin and Cash (ZEC).

HYPE bulls push for new highs | Source: HYPEUSDT on Tradingview.com

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, which cryptocurrency token is the main focus for potentially replicating Hyperliquid's (HYPE) success trajectory?

AThe main focus for potentially replicating Hyperliquid's success is the ASTER token, the native token of the Aster decentralized perpetual exchange.

QWhat is the main reason given for investor optimism regarding the ASTER token's future price?

AInvestors are optimistic because, despite its popularity and high open interest, the ASTER token price is approximately 70% below its all-time high, creating room for a potential recovery rally similar to Hyperliquid's.

QHow does the LIT token's performance compare to that of the ASTER token, according to the article?

AThe LIT token's performance has been similar to ASTER's. Both saw an initial run-up to an all-time high and have since fallen significantly from that peak, with LIT down more than 66%.

QWhat metric is used in the article to rank perpetual decentralized exchanges, and what is Lighter's (LIT) position in this ranking?

AThe article uses open interest to rank perpetual decentralized exchanges. According to this metric, Lighter (LIT) is in the fourth position.

QWhat significant market cap milestone has the Hyperliquid (HYPE) token achieved?

AHyperliquid (HYPE) has achieved a market cap of $17.3 billion, making it the 9th-largest cryptocurrency by market cap, ahead of Dogecoin and Zcash (ZEC).

İlgili Okumalar

Vitalik: Building Index-Tracking Assets Based on Options Rather Than Debt

Vitalik Buterin proposes constructing index-tracking assets using synthetic options rather than debt-based mechanisms. The core problem is enabling exposure to a price index (T, e.g., USD/ETH) in a trust-minimized environment where only ETH is a trustless asset, relying solely on a decentralized oracle. Traditional approaches, like algorithmic stablecoins, use debt positions and require real-time, binding oracles for liquidations, which are difficult to secure. This article suggests a paradigm shift: eliminating liquidation and using options as the fundamental building block, requiring only a "slow" oracle. The design defines two synthetic assets, P and N, with parameters for the index T, a strike price S, and an expiry M. At any time, 1 ETH can be split to create a (P, N) pair or merged back. At expiry M, the oracle determines T's value x. P receives min(1, S/x) ETH, and N receives max(0, 1 - S/x) ETH. This structure inherently avoids insolvency risk (P+N=1) and can share an oracle with prediction markets. To gain stable exposure to T (e.g., USD), a user would hold deeply "in-the-money" P options (with S significantly below the current price) and periodically "roll" them to lower strikes as the price approaches the current strike, rebalancing their portfolio. This transfers the decision of *when* to act from a protocol-enforced liquidation (requiring a real-time oracle) to the user or an automated wrapper. Users can manage MEV risk and oracle dependency by choosing their rebalancing timing and data sources. A key trade-off is accepting some quadratic drift (deviation from perfect peg), estimated at 1-4% annualized volatility. Buterin argues this cost is reasonable compared to fiat currency volatility or equilibrium shifts in other stablecoins. The success of this model depends heavily on designing low-slippage market mechanisms for the rebalancing process, leveraging users' low time preference to execute trades patiently.

marsbit42 dk önce

Vitalik: Building Index-Tracking Assets Based on Options Rather Than Debt

marsbit42 dk önce

Peter Thiel Behind Palantir: Why Is He Preparing an Exit in Argentina?

Peter Thiel, chairman and ideological core of Palantir (a company that builds predictive surveillance systems for US agencies), has reportedly moved his family to Argentina and purchased property there. While framed by associates as a hedge against potential tax increases or geopolitical risk, the article argues the move is highly significant given Thiel's unique position. His wealth is built on the promise that data can predict the future, and his company's systems are deeply embedded in US government enforcement. Therefore, his act of securing an exit route—in a country with a historical reputation as a haven for those fleeing accountability, like Nazi war criminals—is interpreted as a damning signal. The author suggests Thiel may be acting on superior data indicating one of several unfavorable futures: a MAGA political decline, impending legal accountability for Palantir's role, systemic American collapse, or simply personal doomsday beliefs. The juxtaposition of Palantir's recent manifesto praising America with Thiel's Argentine "backdoor" is seen as revealing. The conclusion is that such an exit strategy, from a man whose product is foresight, indicates a loss of confidence in the very system he helped build.

marsbit1 saat önce

Peter Thiel Behind Palantir: Why Is He Preparing an Exit in Argentina?

marsbit1 saat önce

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

“Water Scarcity: The Hidden Vulnerability of AI Infrastructure” In June 2026, SpaceX revised its IPO prospectus to highlight a core resource constraint alongside power and processors: water. This move signals a pivotal shift where water scarcity has transformed from an operational cost to a major, uncontrollable investment risk, directly threatening AI data center expansion. The scale of the problem is immense. U.S. data centers consumed an estimated 17 billion gallons of water for direct cooling in 2023, with indirect water use for power generation exceeding 211 billion gallons. Giants like Google alone use billions of gallons annually, with single sites consuming volumes equivalent to a medium-sized city. This water is largely “consumptive,” evaporated into the atmosphere and lost. This massive demand is colliding with scarcity. Tech companies are building “water tigers” in arid regions, sparking community protests in places like Mexico and Arizona, where data centers can legally use millions of gallons daily—enough for tens of thousands of residents. These conflicts are not about illegality, but about a mismatch between historic water allocation frameworks and new, colossal demand. The consequences are real. Community opposition, largely centered on water, has reportedly stalled or canceled $64 billion in U.S. data center projects over two years. Simultaneously, investors are pressuring companies for greater water footprint transparency, viewing it as a financial risk, not just an ESG metric. Technological solutions like air or liquid cooling involve trade-offs between water and electricity use, with final choices dictated by local constraints. The irony is stark: while industry leaders envision AI as a utility “like water,” its physical infrastructure is straining real-world water supplies. The race for AI supremacy may ultimately be governed not by the fastest chip, but by the slowest water meter.

marsbit1 saat önce

"Water Scarcity": The Hidden Fatal Flaw of AI Infrastructure

marsbit1 saat önce

Zhou Hang: How Much is SpaceX Really Worth?

Summary: Author Zhou Hang argues that while SpaceX is arguably one of the greatest industrial companies of the past 50 years, its anticipated IPO valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion is likely overvalued by about $1.25 trillion. The analysis acknowledges SpaceX's monumental success in slashing launch costs, achieving near-monopoly in commercial launches, and building the Starlink satellite internet constellation. However, using a projected 2030 revenue of $50-80 billion and applying a generous tech company valuation multiple yields a "reasonable" valuation range of only $500 billion to $1.2 trillion. The $1.25 trillion gap stems from premiums for its long-term vision (e.g., Starship, space-based computing), its status as a U.S. strategic national asset, and retail investor enthusiasm driven by the Elon Musk narrative. The article outlines three post-IPO scenarios: valuation solidification (25% probability), sideways consolidation (50%), or a correction to fundamental value (25%). The probability-weighted expected valuation is $1.3-1.5 trillion, suggesting negative expected returns for buyers at the IPO price. The conclusion cautions investors to separate the company's undeniable greatness from the stock's price, advising against chasing the IPO and to wait for key milestones or a lower entry point.

marsbit1 saat önce

Zhou Hang: How Much is SpaceX Really Worth?

marsbit1 saat önce

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

Global card issuance is entering a compliance-driven era, with WasabiCard building next-generation payment infrastructure. The platform asserts that as stablecoins increasingly enter cross-border payments, corporate settlements, and global commerce, the industry is shifting focus from "availability" and "growth-driven" models to long-term, compliant operation under global frameworks. Competition will center on sustainable compliance and global infrastructure capabilities. Stablecoins are evolving from on-chain assets into key payment tools in global business, with card issuance acting as critical infrastructure connecting digital assets to traditional payment networks like Visa and Mastercard. This expansion has revealed structural issues, including cross-regional issuance, BIN resource management, and insufficient AML and risk controls. In response, the industry is moving away from reliance on "grey efficiency" towards prioritizing compliance, risk management, and long-term operational stability. WasabiCard outlines its strategy: collaborating with licensed principals and local partners for localized operations, building robust KYC/AML systems, strictly separating commercial and consumer BIN usage, and enhancing global issuance, payment, and cross-border fund flow infrastructure. The goal is to build stable, scalable payment infrastructure amid evolving global regulations, shifting industry competition from scale to infrastructure capability. As stablecoins integrate further with global commerce, payment infrastructure will become a fundamental, embedded component of internet business. WasabiCard will continue to develop capabilities in global card issuance, stablecoin payments, cross-border fund flows, and API-driven financial workflows.

marsbit1 saat önce

Global Card Issuance Enters a Compliance-Driven Era: WasabiCard is Building the Next-Generation Payment Infrastructure

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures

Popüler Makaleler

HYPE Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Hyperliquid (HYPE) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Hyperliquid (HYPE) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Hyperliquid (HYPE) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınHyperliquid (HYPE) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Hyperliquid (HYPE) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Hyperliquid (HYPE) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

222 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2024.12.11Güncellenme 2026.06.02

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların HYPE (HYPE) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.