US Treasury Starts GENIUS Act Rollout With Notice Of Proposed Rulemaking

bitcoinist2026-04-02 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-02 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The US Treasury has published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to begin implementing the GENIUS Act, a federal law governing payment stablecoins. The 87-page proposal outlines how federal and state regulatory frameworks will interact, allowing states to adopt "substantially similar" rules with some discretion. The NPRM references the OCC’s flexible approach to regulating stablecoin issuers and sets a transition timeline: once the law takes effect, only authorized issuers can operate, and by July 2028, unlicensed stablecoin sales will be illegal. The proposal also preserves a state-option pathway for smaller issuers with under $10 billion in issuance, provided states certify regulatory alignment. Treasury is soliciting public feedback on the proposed rules.

The US Treasury on Wednesday published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that launches the administration’s first formal effort to implement the GENIUS Act, the new federal law governing payment stablecoins that was signed by President Donald Trump last year.

The NPRM is the Treasury’s initial regulatory proposal to give effect to the statute’s requirements and solicits public comment on how the department intends to apply the law.

GENIUS Act’s Proposed Rules

Under the GENIUS Act — formally titled the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act — Treasury is charged with setting out, through notice-and-comment rulemaking, high-level principles for assessing whether a state regulatory regime is “substantially similar” to the federal framework.

The department’s 87-page proposed rule explains how it expects federal and state authorities to interact under the new regime and identifies matters on which Treasury seeks input from stakeholders.

Treasury’s proposal signals that it anticipates states will look to federal guidance, including standards the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has proposed, when deciding how prescriptive their own rules should be.

The NPRM cites the OCC’s approach, which the OCC says is intended to be flexible and calibrated to the nature, scope, and risks posed by a permitted payment stablecoin issuer’s activities.

Treasury’s draft leaves room for states to adopt principles-based requirements, indicating that state regulators will have discretion to design standards for issuers who qualify under a state regime.

The ultimate effects will depend on the specific content of each state’s regulatory regime, which the proposal anticipates could vary widely because the GENIUS Act grants states discretion in implementing their own frameworks.

Treasury Draft Sets Timeline

The draft rule also sets out the transition timeline and market consequences contemplated by the statute. Once the GENIUS Act takes effect, entities will be barred from issuing payment stablecoins in the United States unless they are authorized as permitted payment stablecoin issuers.

In addition, the statute makes it unlawful, beginning July 18, 2028, for digital asset service providers to offer or sell unlicensed stablecoins to persons located in the United States.

To preserve a state-option pathway for smaller issuers, the law allows a state to license payment stablecoin issuers with a consolidated total outstanding issuance of no more than $10 billion, but only if the state certifies that its regulatory regime is substantially similar to the federal framework.

Taken together, the department is seeking public input on the proposal’s details as it moves toward finalizing rules intended to implement the GENIUS Act’s structure for supervision, licensing, and consumer protections in the stablecoin market.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap’s recovery toward $2.35 trillion on Wednesday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the GENIUS Act and what is its full formal title?

AThe GENIUS Act is a new federal law governing payment stablecoins. Its full formal title is the 'Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act'.

QWhat action did the US Treasury take to begin implementing the GENIUS Act?

AThe US Treasury published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which is its initial regulatory proposal to implement the statute and is soliciting public comment on its application.

QWhat is the key deadline set by the statute for digital asset service providers regarding unlicensed stablecoins?

ABeginning July 18, 2028, it will be unlawful for digital asset service providers to offer or sell unlicensed stablecoins to persons located in the United States.

QWhat is the maximum issuance limit for a state to license smaller payment stablecoin issuers under the 'state-option pathway'?

AA state can license payment stablecoin issuers with a consolidated total outstanding issuance of no more than $10 billion, provided the state certifies its regulatory regime is substantially similar to the federal framework.

QWhich federal agency's approach does the NPRM cite as a model for states to consider when designing their own rules?

AThe NPRM cites the approach of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), which is intended to be flexible and calibrated to the risks of a stablecoin issuer's activities.

İlgili Okumalar

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1 saat önce

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1 saat önce

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit1 saat önce

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片