‘Uninformed FUD’ – White House on claims of Coinbase stalling the CLARITY Act again

ambcrypto2026-03-26 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-26 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The White House has dismissed speculation that Coinbase is opposing the latest stablecoin yield deal and blocking the CLARITY Act, calling the claims "uninformed FUD." Patrick Witt, a digital asset advisor to the President, expressed confidence that the recent agreement between the Senate and the White House would revive momentum for the bill. Rumors of Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's opposition originated from a Punchbowl News report, though it was noted his stance was less severe than his previous public objections. The new deal limits stablecoin yields to account activity rather than passive interest earned via intermediaries, a change seen as favorable to banks. As of writing, neither the banking industry nor Armstrong had publicly commented on the compromise. Senator Cynthia Lummis emphasized the urgency of passing the bill under the current pro-crypto administration. Meanwhile, the proposed yield restrictions caused Circle's stock (CRCL) to drop 20% before partially recovering.

The White House has dismissed ongoing speculation that Coinbase has opposed the latest stablecoin yield deal and could block the crypto bill, the CLARITY Act, from moving forward again.

In an X (formerly Twitter) post, Patrick Witt, the executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, discredited the claims as ‘uninformed FUD.’

He seemed confident that the stablecoin yield deal made last week between the Senate and White House would reignite momentum for the CLARITY Act.

Rumors on the Coinbase holdout

The speculation that Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong opposed the stablecoin yield proposal was sparked by a Punchbowl News (PBN) report.

According to Brendan Pedersen, a reporter at PBN, representatives at the exchange told the Senate on Monday that Coinbase could not support the latest stablecoin yield deal. However, Pedersen clarified that the holdout was not as strong as Armstrong’s public opposition to the bill in January.

Although some stablecoin yield supporters stood by the alleged Armstrong holdout, others pleaded with him to allow the bill to pass and refine it later.

For his part, Tommy Shaughnessy, founder of crypto VC firm Delphi Ventures, implored Armstrong to reconsider his strong stance against the yield compromise and the crypto bill.

The recent deal narrowed stablecoin yield to account activity rather than the current passive interest earned on balances via intermediaries.

Although this was a win for the banks, as of writing, there was no public statement from the industry on whether they were okay with the yield compromise or not.

Likewise, as of writing, Brian Armstrong had not made a public statement on the alleged opposition to the stablecoin yield compromise.

However, Senator Cynthia Lummis stressed that the bill can’t be postponed, underscoring the current pro-crypto regime as the best to advance clear rules for the sector.

Meanwhile, the details on the limited stablecoin yield in the latest CLARITY Act draft made traders turn bearish on Circle stock, CRCL. The stock fell 20% on Tuesday, from $127 to $98, before easing back to over $100 on Wednesday.

Final Summary

Trump’s crypto advisor dismissed rumors that Coinbase is opposing the latest stablecoin yield deal, calling the speculation “uninformed FUD.”
The proposed stablecoin yield restriction sent Circle stock tumbling 20% this week.

Trend Kriptolar

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

İlgili Sorular

QWhat did the White House call the claims about Coinbase stalling the CLARITY Act?

AThe White House, through Patrick Witt, dismissed the claims as 'uninformed FUD'.

QWho is Patrick Witt and what is his role?

APatrick Witt is the executive director of the President's Council of Advisors for Digital Assets.

QWhat was the main change in the latest stablecoin yield deal?

AThe recent deal narrowed stablecoin yield to account activity rather than the passive interest earned on balances via intermediaries.

QWhat was the market reaction to the proposed stablecoin yield restrictions?

ACircle's stock (CRCL) fell 20% on Tuesday, from $127 to $98, before recovering to over $100 on Wednesday.

QAccording to the article, had Brian Armstrong made a public statement on the alleged opposition at the time of writing?

ANo, as of the time of writing, Brian Armstrong had not made a public statement on the alleged opposition to the stablecoin yield compromise.

İlgili Okumalar

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinist10 dk önce

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinist10 dk önce

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit11 dk önce

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit11 dk önce

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbit15 dk önce

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbit15 dk önce

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbit1 saat önce

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbit1 saat önce

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1 saat önce

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Popüler Makaleler

HOUSE Nasıl Satın Alınır

HTX.com’a hoş geldiniz! Housecoin (HOUSE) satın alma işlemlerini basit ve kullanışlı bir hâle getirdik. Adım adım açıkladığımız rehberimizi takip ederek kripto yolculuğunuza başlayın. 1. Adım: HTX Hesabınızı OluşturunHTX'te ücretsiz bir hesap açmak için e-posta adresinizi veya telefon numaranızı kullanın. Sorunsuzca kaydolun ve tüm özelliklerin kilidini açın. Hesabımı Aç2. Adım: Kripto Satın Al Bölümüne Gidin ve Ödeme Yönteminizi SeçinKredi/Banka Kartı: Visa veya Mastercard'ınızı kullanarak anında Housecoin (HOUSE) satın alın.Bakiye: Sorunsuz bir şekilde işlem yapmak için HTX hesap bakiyenizdeki fonları kullanın.Üçüncü Taraflar: Kullanımı kolaylaştırmak için Google Pay ve Apple Pay gibi popüler ödeme yöntemlerini ekledik.P2P: HTX'teki diğer kullanıcılarla doğrudan işlem yapın.Borsa Dışı (OTC): Yatırımcılar için kişiye özel hizmetler ve rekabetçi döviz kurları sunuyoruz.3. Adım: Housecoin (HOUSE) Varlıklarınızı SaklayınHousecoin (HOUSE) satın aldıktan sonra HTX hesabınızda saklayın. Alternatif olarak, blok zinciri transferi yoluyla başka bir yere gönderebilir veya diğer kripto para birimlerini takas etmek için kullanabilirsiniz.4. Adım: Housecoin (HOUSE) Varlıklarınızla İşlem YapınHTX'in spot piyasasında Housecoin (HOUSE) ile kolayca işlemler yapın.Hesabınıza erişin, işlem çiftinizi seçin, işlemlerinizi gerçekleştirin ve gerçek zamanlı olarak izleyin. Hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli yatırımcılar için kullanıcı dostu bir deneyim sunuyoruz.

440 Toplam GörüntülenmeYayınlanma 2025.04.27Güncellenme 2026.06.02

Tartışmalar

HTX Topluluğuna hoş geldiniz. Burada, en son platform gelişmeleri hakkında bilgi sahibi olabilir ve profesyonel piyasa görüşlerine erişebilirsiniz. Kullanıcıların HOUSE (HOUSE) fiyatı hakkındaki görüşleri aşağıda sunulmaktadır.