Trader Nets $6.7M Profit as PIPPIN Hits $0.8454 All-Time High

TheNewsCrypto2026-02-25 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-25 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Despite the broader crypto market experiencing extended fear and major assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum facing significant monthly declines, the altcoin PIPPIN has demonstrated remarkable resilience. It reached a new all-time high of $0.8454, with one trader realizing approximately $6.7 million in profit from an initial $180,000 investment made four months ago. Over the past month, PIPPIN surged over 157%, making it one of the top gainers. Its price is currently around $0.80, with key resistance near $0.85 and support around $0.75. Technical indicators suggest strong bullish momentum but also hint at potential short-term consolidation due to overbought conditions. Daily trading volume increased by 53.37%, reaching $102 million.

As the Crypto Fear & Greed Index continues to stay in the extreme fear zone for an extended period, while Bitcoin remains down over the past month, select altcoins are showing notable resilience. Among them, pippin reached an all-time high today, even as broader market pressure weighs on major assets. While pippin holders are currently sitting on unrealized profits.

According to the on-chain analytics platform Lookonchain, a trader who created a wallet named BXNU5a four months ago and bought 8.16 million pippin tokens by spending approximately $180,000 currently has those tokens worth around $6.7 million.

As the major cryptos are struggling with the monthly extended losses, BTC is nearly 28% down, then, ETH is 34% down, whereas pippin is up over 157.76% over a month. While writing, pippin token is one among the top gainers on CoinMarketCap.

The token is, up nearly 10% in the last 24 hours. Before settling down, it had reached an all-time high at $0.8454 today. With that, the daily trading volume has increased 53.37%, reaching toward $102 million. Meanwhile, pippin’s open interest has been reduced 1.76% in the last 24 hours at the time of writing.

PIPPIN Price Analysis

The daily chart of PIPPIN shows strong bullish momentum over the past two weeks, after early February lows near $0.18–$0.20, and is now trading around $0.80. With that, the nearby resistance is placed near the recent high around $0.84 – $0.85, a decisive breakout above this zone could reach the $0.90 level. On the downside, immediate support is seen around $0.75, followed by a stronger support zone near $0.65.

When seeing the technical indicators, the Relative Strength Index is sitting at 72, as it reached the overbought zone, which implies strong momentum, but it shows the probability of short-term consolidation or pullback. Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence and Divergence line remains above the signal line, and the value remains positive, for now the trend remains bullish.

Top Updated Crypto News

Trump’s State of the Union Address Triggers a Controlled Surge for Cryptocurrencies

TagsBlockchainCryptocurrencypippin

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the all-time high price reached by PIPPIN, and how much profit did a specific trader make from it?

APIPPIN reached an all-time high of $0.8454, and a trader made a profit of $6.7 million from an initial investment of approximately $180,000.

QHow has PIPPIN performed compared to Bitcoin and Ethereum over the past month?

AOver the past month, PIPPIN is up 157.76%, while Bitcoin is down nearly 28% and Ethereum is down 34%.

QWhat does the Relative Strength Index (RSI) value of 72 indicate for PIPPIN's current market condition?

AAn RSI of 72 indicates that PIPPIN is in the overbought zone, suggesting strong bullish momentum but also a potential for short-term consolidation or pullback.

QWhat are the key resistance and support levels for PIPPIN according to the price analysis?

AThe immediate resistance is near $0.84–$0.85, with a breakout potentially reaching $0.90. Support levels are around $0.75 and a stronger zone near $0.65.

QHow did PIPPIN's trading volume and open interest change in the last 24 hours?

APIPPIN's daily trading volume increased by 53.37% to around $102 million, while open interest decreased by 1.76% in the last 24 hours.

İlgili Okumalar

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Rewrites the Public Chain Narrative

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that Telegram will replace the TON Foundation as the core driver and largest validator of The Open Network (TON). Key initiatives include a sixfold reduction in transaction fees, performance upgrades, and improved developer tools within the next few weeks. This marks a strategic shift from Telegram merely providing user access to deeply integrating TON into its platform's core infrastructure. The goal is to transform Telegram's massive social traffic into sustainable on-chain activity. While viral mini-apps like Notcoin have demonstrated Telegram's ability to drive user adoption, TON aims to support frequent, low-value transactions inherent to social platforms—such as tipping, in-app payments, and game rewards. Ultra-low fees and sub-second finality (0.6 seconds) are crucial to making blockchain interactions seamless and nearly invisible within the Telegram user experience. However, Telegram's increased central role raises questions about network decentralization. Durov argues that Telegram's participation will attract more large validators, thereby enhancing decentralization. TON also offers high annual staking rewards (18.8%), aiming to retain capital within its ecosystem. The fundamental challenge for TON is no longer leveraging Telegram's user base, but becoming an indispensable, seamless infrastructure layer for Telegram's everyday applications—moving from an adjacent chain to an embedded utility.

marsbit3 dk önce

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Rewrites the Public Chain Narrative

marsbit3 dk önce

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Reshapes Public Chain Narrative

Telegram's founder, Pavel Durov, has announced a major shift in the development of The Open Network (TON). Telegram will now become the core driver of TON, replacing the TON Foundation and becoming its largest validator. The focus will be on technical upgrades over the next few weeks, including slashing network fees by six times to near-zero and improving finality time to 0.6 seconds. This move signifies a deeper integration between Telegram and TON, moving beyond just providing a user base. The goal is to transform Telegram's vast social traffic and built-in features—like Mini Apps, payments, and bots—into sustainable, on-chain usage scenarios. The reduced fees and faster speeds are crucial for enabling the small, frequent transactions typical of social interactions. While this promises stronger execution and product alignment, it raises questions about centralization. Durov argues Telegram's involvement will attract more validators, enhancing decentralization, but the outcome remains to be seen. Additionally, TON's high annual staking reward of 18.8% aims to retain capital within the ecosystem. The key challenge for TON is no longer just leveraging Telegram's entry point, but becoming an invisible, seamless infrastructure layer within Telegram's daily use. Its success hinges on converting viral attention into lasting, embedded utility.

Odaily星球日报13 dk önce

Telegram Takes Direct Control of TON, Social Traffic Reshapes Public Chain Narrative

Odaily星球日报13 dk önce

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit1 saat önce

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit1 saat önce

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit1 saat önce

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit1 saat önce

Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

CoreWeave's Q1 2026 earnings report has intensified the ongoing bull-bear battle over the AI infrastructure stock. While revenue doubled year-over-year to $2.08B and the firm's remaining performance obligation (RPO) surged to nearly $100B, its net loss more than doubled to $740M. The critical point of contention is profitability: while adjusted EBITDA margin was a robust 56%, the adjusted operating margin collapsed to just 1% due to soaring infrastructure and sales costs. A weaker-than-expected Q2 revenue guidance further triggered an 11.4% single-day stock drop. The bull thesis hinges on CoreWeave's massive order backlog, deep strategic ties with NVIDIA (as a customer, investor, and key supplier), and a diversified client base now including Anthropic and Meta. The bear case focuses on the "scale at all costs" model, where expanding revenue leads to wider losses, ballooning debt ($25B), and massive capital expenditures ($6.8B in Q1). Insider selling by executives contrasts with a notable new investor: Chinese investor Duan Yongping initiated a small position (0.12% of his portfolio) in Q4 2025 near the stock's lows. The coming Q2 report is seen as a key test for management's promise of a profit margin recovery.

marsbit1 saat önce

Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片