# veCRV İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "veCRV" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Curve Governance Upheaval: 17 Million CRV Funding Proposal Rejected, Capital Entities Become New Decision-Making Core

A significant governance proposal within the Curve DAO, requesting 17 million CRV in funding for development team Swiss Stake AG, was recently rejected. Major veCRV holders, including Convex and Yearn, voted against the proposal, effectively blocking its passage. The rejection reflects two key concerns within the community: a demand for greater transparency and accountability regarding the use of previous grants and future spending plans, and a reluctance from large token holders to dilute the value of their veCRV holdings without a clear, direct return on investment. The article highlights a shift in DeFi governance, moving away from a model of automatic funding approval. It contrasts the veToken model, used by Curve, with standard governance systems. The ve model binds voting power to long-term token lock-ups, attracting capital-heavy players focused on long-term gains. This, combined with the prevalence of vote-aggregating protocols like Convex, is centralizing decision-making power with large capital providers rather than the broader community or even project founders. The outcome of this vote suggests that future governance power in Curve may lie primarily with these major stakeholders.

marsbit12/26 16:03

Curve Governance Upheaval: 17 Million CRV Funding Proposal Rejected, Capital Entities Become New Decision-Making Core

marsbit12/26 16:03

Behind the Rejection of the $17M CRV Grant: Founder's Proposal Power Weakened, Convex and Yearn Become Key Players

A proposal to grant 17 million CRV tokens (worth approximately $1.7 million) to Swiss Stake AG, a long-time core development team, was rejected in a Curve Finance governance vote. Major veCRV holders, including Convex and Yearn, voted against it, wielding enough voting power to determine the outcome. The rejection reflects two key shifts in DAO governance: First, communities are demanding greater accountability, transparency, and measurable results for treasury grants, moving beyond unconditional funding. Second, large veCRV holders, motivated by self-interest, are resistant to proposals that dilute their token value without clear, foreseeable benefits to them. The incident highlights the evolving power dynamics within Curve's governance. The veToken model, which ties voting rights to long-term locked capital, inherently concentrates power among large, capital-rich entities like Convex and Yearn. As users delegate their tokens to these protocols for yield and liquidity, governance is increasingly shifting from founders and communities to a form of "governance capitalism" dominated by major stakeholders.

marsbit12/25 13:15

Behind the Rejection of the $17M CRV Grant: Founder's Proposal Power Weakened, Convex and Yearn Become Key Players

marsbit12/25 13:15

活动图片

Project Updatesright-arrow

Regulatory Policyright-arrow