# USDT İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "USDT" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Three Binance Bitcoin Charts Point to the Direction of BTC's Next Major Move

Three key on-chain metrics from Binance suggest Bitcoin's (BTC) short-term price direction may be influenced by shifting liquidity patterns and trader positioning. Data indicates rising selling pressure from large holders (whales), with the exchange whale ratio across all platforms reaching 0.47. This ratio's 14-day EMA on Binance climbed to 0.427, a four-month high, signaling whales are moving coins to exchanges, often a precursor to distribution. This creates overhead resistance, making a breakout above $93,000 difficult and increasing the likelihood of consolidation or a deeper retest of support levels. Simultaneously, the 30-day SMA of BTC inflows to Binance hit 8,915, nearing the March 3rd peak of 9,031. Historically, such high inflow levels have been followed by significant price corrections, indicating holders are preparing to reduce risk exposure or rotate assets. Furthermore, Binance recorded a substantial inflow of 946,000 USDT deposits over seven days, significantly more than other major exchanges. This surge in stablecoin liquidity suggests traders are preparing capital to either buy the dip or reposition during expected volatility. In summary, these three metrics—rising whale selling, peak BTC exchange inflows, and growing stablecoin reserves—point to increased selling pressure and a cautious market. A break below the $90,000 support could accelerate a downtrend, while holding this level might lead to a swift rebound.

cointelegraph_中文2 gün önce 07:11

Three Binance Bitcoin Charts Point to the Direction of BTC's Next Major Move

cointelegraph_中文2 gün önce 07:11

Tether's "Favorite Son" STABLE Crashes? Plunges 60% on First Day, Whale Jumping the Queue + No CEX Listing Sparks Trust Panic

Stable, a new Layer 1 blockchain heavily backed by Tether and Bitfinex, launched its mainnet and STABLE token on December 8. Despite significant pre-launch deposits totalling over $1.3 billion and strong market interest, the token’s first-day performance was highly disappointing. It opened around $0.036, briefly rose to nearly $0.046, then plummeted over 60% to a low of $0.015. Its fully diluted valuation (FDV) fell to $1.7 billion amid thin liquidity. The token’s not yet listed on major centralized exchanges like Binance or Coinbase, limiting its accessibility. The launch wass marred by controversy after a whale deposited hundreds of millions of USDT before the official start time, raising concerns about fairness and possible insider trading. This damaged trust in a project whose core narrative is transparency and reliability. Stable is designed as a stablecoin-focused chain with USDT as the native gas fee, aiming for a near gas-less user experience. It uses a custom DPoS consensus mechanism and is EVM-compatible. However, its tokenomics have raised concerns: STABLE tokens are used only for governance and staking, not fee payment, and 50% of the total 100 billion supply is allocated to the team, investors, and advisors with a one-year cliff. The project faces intense competition from established chains like Polygon, Tron, and Solana, as well as emerging stablecoin-specific L1s like Circle’s Arc and Paradigm-backed Tempo. Its success hinges on rapid execution, ecosystem development, and enterprise adoption planned for late 2025 to mid-2026. Early missteps and a lack of trust have cast doubt on its ability to compete.

marsbitDün 18:11

Tether's "Favorite Son" STABLE Crashes? Plunges 60% on First Day, Whale Jumping the Queue + No CEX Listing Sparks Trust Panic

marsbitDün 18:11

Behind Cryptocurrency 'Thefts and Scams': Why Does Civil Relief Frequently Encounter Obstacles?

Behind the surge in cryptocurrency "thefts and scams", why does civil relief frequently hit roadblocks? This article explores the legal challenges through two representative cases. In Case 1, a company paid 800,000 USDT to a Chinese employee of an overseas exchange for a listing service, only to have the employee disappear. Despite cross-border complexities and initial police refusal to accept the report (citing the company’s foreign status and claims that crypto "is not protected by law"), lawyers eventually secured case acceptance by invoking criminal procedure rules and citing regulatory recognition of virtual assets as property. However, formal立案 (case filing) is still pending. Case 2 involved a woman scammed into transferring over RMB 3 million to a USDT exchanger for a fake investment. While police quickly arrested the exchanger, the main scammer remained abroad. The exchanger was released due to lack of criminal intent, and a civil lawsuit against them for unjust enrichment was rejected at filing. The judge indicated that even if accepted, such cases rarely succeed. The analysis highlights key obstacles: the "criminal procedure takes precedence" principle often blocks civil suits until criminal proceedings conclude; if a criminal judgment orders restitution, further civil claims are barred; and bypassing criminal reporting to file civilly usually results in the case being referred back to police, wasting time. Ultimately, when crypto crimes are involved, civil relief is extremely difficult. The more viable path remains criminal prosecution, despite its own challenges, as civil victories are exceptionally rare in practice.

marsbitDün 19:39

Behind Cryptocurrency 'Thefts and Scams': Why Does Civil Relief Frequently Encounter Obstacles?

marsbitDün 19:39

活动图片