# Scams İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "Scams" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Gas Fees and Transaction Security: Avoiding Asset Drainage by Malicious Contracts

Blockchain transactions require gas fee as fuel, but malicious actors exploit this mechanism to drain assets through deceptive practices. Common traps include: 1) Unlimited token approvals, where users grant open-ended access to smart contracts, enabling unauthorized transfers; 2) Gas fee hijacking, where attackers manipulate transaction parameters or embed infinite loops to force excessive gas payments; 3) Fake approvals/transactions via phishing sites that mimic legitimate dApps to steal assets. Key preventive measures: - Apply minimal approval principles, authorizing only necessary token amounts and revoking unused permissions. - Manually set gas limits and prices using wallet advanced settings, avoiding defaults during high network congestion. - Verify contract addresses, transaction details, and DApp authenticity before confirming any transaction. - Use separate wallets for daily interactions and large holdings to isolate risks. If compromised: - Immediately freeze the wallet and revoke all suspicious approvals. - Preserve evidence (TxID, contract addresses) and report to platforms. - Seek professional assistance for large losses—avoid paying "recovery fees" (common secondary scams). Recommended tools: Approval checkers (e.g., Revoke.cash), block explorers (Etherscan), and real-time alert systems. Stay vigilant by scrutinizing every transaction and rejecting unsolicited links.

marsbit02/28 14:34

Gas Fees and Transaction Security: Avoiding Asset Drainage by Malicious Contracts

marsbit02/28 14:34

Ads During the American Super Bowl Look Like Scams

The 2026 Super Bowl, often called the "American Super Bowl," was a spectacle of sports, entertainment, and high-stakes marketing. This year’s event featured three notable incidents that highlight the intersection of prediction markets, insider information, and viral marketing. First, a newly created account on the prediction market Polymarket placed nearly $80,000 in bets—with 17 out of 19 wagers correctly predicting details of the halftime show, including appearances by Lady Gaga and the absence of Travis Scott. The account’s near-perfect accuracy led to suspicions of insider trading, possibly linked to the event’s production team. Second, a trader named Alex Gonzalez ran onto the field during the game with promotional messages painted on his body. Reports indicate he had previously bet on such a field invasion occurring, after accounting for legal fees and bail, netted around $70,000. His actions blurred the line between predicting and creating events for profit. Finally, a viral “leaked” video showed influencer Logan Paul apparently betting $1 million on Polymarket during the game. It was later revealed to be a marketing stunt orchestrated by Polymarket itself, in which Paul has investment ties. Together, these events illustrate how prediction markets can be manipulated through insider knowledge, performative acts, and staged publicity—raising questions about authenticity in high-profile events.

marsbit02/12 05:55

Ads During the American Super Bowl Look Like Scams

marsbit02/12 05:55

活动图片