# Curve İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "Curve" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Whitepaper 2.0, Two Sets of State Forks, the Rise of Clones: What Happened to Sato Overnight?

On the night of May 7, 2026, the SATO project released "Whitepaper 2.0" alongside significant front-end changes, shifting from "buy/sell" to "mint/burn" terminology. This update aimed to clarify market confusion regarding trading mechanics, token burns, and price discrepancies between its bonding curve and secondary markets. Key changes included explicitly defining the separate existence of the bonding curve pool (for minting/burning) and the secondary SATO/USDT pool, and detailing the core mathematical formulas governing the curve. Concurrently, SATO's market cap fell sharply from near $40 million to around $14.4 million. A fork project, SAT1, emerged with a similar bonding curve model but a key technical difference: SAT1 uses a single unified state variable (`ethCum`) for all core logic (minting, burning, halt trigger), whereas SATO's mechanism relies on two state variables (`ethCum` and `totalMintedFair`), which can drift apart and cause operational discrepancies. Both projects position themselves as operator-free "issuance machines" with asymptotic supply curves approaching 21 million tokens and charge a 0.3% fee on transactions, which remains in the protocol. The article emphasizes that despite intricate designs, both SATO and SAT1 are in highly volatile, sentiment-driven phases, and warns that mechanism innovation does not replace the need for personal risk management.

marsbit05/08 16:12

Whitepaper 2.0, Two Sets of State Forks, the Rise of Clones: What Happened to Sato Overnight?

marsbit05/08 16:12

Curve Finance Accuses PancakeSwap of Copying StableSwap Code

Curve Finance has publicly accused PancakeSwap of copying its proprietary StableSwap code without permission, calling it a license breach and warning of legal and technical risks. The accusation, made on March 6 via X, came in response to PancakeSwap’s March 2 announcement of launching StableSwap on its Infinity platform. Curve urged PancakeSwap to seek proper licensing and collaboration to avoid legal issues and ensure user safety. In response, PancakeSwap acknowledged the dispute and entered private talks. Curve later softened its tone, suggesting a potential “build together” partnership. The outcome may set a precedent for intellectual property in open-source DeFi, with users concerned about network security implications.

TheNewsCrypto03/07 05:55

Curve Finance Accuses PancakeSwap of Copying StableSwap Code

TheNewsCrypto03/07 05:55

Makina recovers majority of funds from exploit as whitehat process returns 920 ETH

Makina has recovered the majority of funds from a 20 January exploit, with approximately 920 ETH returned through the SEAL Whitehat Safe Harbor program. The MEV builder involved received a 10% bounty. The total exploit amounted to around 1,299 ETH, with 920 ETH representing the bulk of the funds initially received by the builder. Recovery efforts continue for the remaining 276 ETH sent to a Rocket Pool validator. The exploit only affected the USDC side of Makina’s DUSD/USDC Curve pool, impacting liquidity providers but not other users. The incident highlights the role of whitehat frameworks and coordinated responses in mitigating DeFi losses, though it remains one of the larger exploits in early 2026.

ambcrypto01/22 17:59

Makina recovers majority of funds from exploit as whitehat process returns 920 ETH

ambcrypto01/22 17:59

活动图片

Industry News

Regulatory Policy