South Korea moves to block USDT and USDC from corporate trading – Details

ambcrypto2026-03-08 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-08 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) is moving to exclude USD-based stablecoins like USDT and USDC from its upcoming corporate crypto trading guidelines. This decision aims to prevent indiscriminate investments in the early market stages and is partly due to the current legal framework not recognizing stablecoins as a valid external payment method. The proposed rules will allow eligible firms to invest up to 5% of their capital in crypto, but only in top assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, traded through regulated exchanges. This aligns with South Korea's broader push to promote the Korean Won-pegged stablecoins and reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar, a trend also emerging in other countries like China and Russia.

South Korea is mulling banning USD-based stablecoins, especially Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC, from its upcoming corporate crypto rules.

According to a local publication, the country’s watchdog, the Financial Services Commission (FSC), will exclude dollar-denominated stablecoins from the ‘corporate virtual currency trading’ guidelines.

The report noted the move was designed to “prevent indiscriminate investments’ in the early stages of the market.

Additionally, the current legal framework, the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act, does not treat stablecoins as a means of external payment. A recent push for the amendment of the Act to include stablecoins has yet to be ratified.

Even so, local firms had requested that stablecoins be included to help them hedge against exchange rate risks and drive faster settlements.

South Korea proposed crypto rules

For over nine years, South Korea’s crypto scene has mostly been dominated by individual retail investors. However, there has been strong institutional crypto adoption across the U.S., the E.U., and parts of Asia.

As such, South Korea has opted to set clear rules for local corporations seeking to engage in the sector.

These rules will be rolled out in the upcoming FSC’s corporate crypto trading rules.

Per the proposal, eligible firms will invest up to 5% of their capital in crypto. However, the investment will be restricted only to the top crypto assets, including Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH].

Besides, transactions will be conducted strictly through regulated exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb.

That said, South Korea has been pushing for stablecoins denominated in Korean Won (KRW) since last year to reduce reliance on US dollar alternatives.

So, the need for monetary sovereignty could also be another key reason for excluding USDT and USDC. In fact, China and Russia have made similar moves, underscoring stablecoin adoption as a national security issue among key players.

Stablecoins, or digital currencies pegged to various traditional currencies, have grown to over $300 billion amid explosive global adoption. The crypto rails have made stablecoins a low-cost and fast way to send remittances and international payments.

Stablecoin activity in Asia

However, U.S dollar-based USDT and USDC control over 90% of the market share. But there’s a likely looming showdown as various jurisdictions position themselves to fight US dollar dominance.

Interestingly, Asia has emerged as a key stablecoin corridor, accounting for 60% ($245 billion) of total activity in 2025. Asia-originated activity is primarily driven by Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan. But most of these countries are pushing to secure their turf from U.S dollar stablecoins.

It remains to be seen how these proposed foreign stablecoins will compete with USDC and USDT in the near future.


Final Summary

  • South Korean regulators and lawmakers are considering excluding USDT and USDC from corporate crypto trading guidelines
  • Broader Asia dominated global stablecoin activity, driving $245B in 2025, but individual countries are pushing for stablecoins pegged to their local currencies.

İlgili Sorular

QWhy is South Korea considering banning USDT and USDC from corporate crypto trading?

ASouth Korea is considering this ban to prevent indiscriminate investments in the early stages of the market, and because the current Foreign Exchange Transactions Act does not treat stablecoins as a means of external payment. Additionally, the country is pushing for monetary sovereignty by promoting stablecoins denominated in the Korean Won (KRW).

QWhat is the maximum percentage of capital that eligible South Korean firms can invest in crypto under the new proposal?

AEligible firms will be allowed to invest up to 5% of their capital in crypto, but this investment will be restricted to top crypto assets like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH).

QWhich regulated exchanges will be used for corporate crypto transactions in South Korea?

ACorporate crypto transactions will be conducted strictly through regulated exchanges such as Upbit and Bithumb.

QWhat percentage of global stablecoin activity did Asia account for in 2025, according to the article?

AAsia accounted for 60% of total global stablecoin activity in 2025, which amounted to $245 billion.

QWhat are the two main reasons cited for the push towards local currency stablecoins in various countries?

AThe two main reasons are to reduce reliance on U.S. dollar alternatives and to address stablecoin adoption as a matter of national security, as seen in the moves by countries like China and Russia.

İlgili Okumalar

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit59 dk önce

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit59 dk önce

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit1 saat önce

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片