SEC plans ‘token taxonomy’ for crypto assets even if CLARITY Act fails

ambcrypto2026-03-05 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-05 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

U.S. regulators are advancing crypto guidelines independently of the stalled CLARITY Act. The SEC is developing a 'token taxonomy' to clarify how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, providing regulatory obligations for firms and investors. Simultaneously, the CFTC is proposing rules for prediction markets and plans to issue guidance on crypto perpetual contracts. These efforts aim to establish enforceable frameworks even without broader legislation, as bipartisan support for the CLARITY Act remains uncertain due to disputes over stablecoin regulations.

U.S regulators could still offer clear guidelines for the crypto sector even if the broader market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, fails to become law.

Notably, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has already issued interpretive guidance on how to apply federal securities law to certain crypto assets.

The guidance is under White House review, with Bloomberg reporting that it will establish a ‘token taxonomy’ to help categorize crypto assets that fall under SEC jurisdiction.

An SEC spokesperson further clarified that,

“As Chairman Atkins said, the Commission will consider interpretive guidance around a token taxonomy for crypto assets – in line with market structure legislation – to ensure that investors and innovators have a clear understanding of their regulatory obligations.”

Worth noting that this is separate from the SEC’s pending rulemaking proposal on crypto asset offerings.

For ETF Prime’s Nate Geraci, the move would be net positive, especially if the CLARITY Act stalls.

“CLARITY Act would be better, but SEC apparently not waiting around for politicians to figure out how to classify crypto assets...”

Such regulatory clarity would establish an enforceable framework that allows crypto firms to register with the regulator, conduct disclosure requirements, and engage with investors, amongst other things.

In fact, some analysts who viewed the CLARITY Act as a ‘bad bill’ advocated for this route to safeguard the market.

CFTC pushes for prediction market rules

Separately, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which handles derivatives trading, has pledged to unveil clear rules for booming prediction markets.

Like the SEC, the CFTC also submitted a proposal for rulemaking for the multi-billion-dollar prediction markets.

Besides, CFTC Chairman Mike Selig had pledged to unveil crypto perps guidelines by next month. Collectively, these regulatory moves could allow key players to operate even if the CLARITY Act fails to hit the finish line.

In fact, the bill stalled earlier in the year as the crypto and banking industries failed to reach a stablecoin yield deal.

Surprisingly, the White House has openly criticized banks for their hardline stance on stablecoin rewards and sided with the crypto industry. The ongoing rift could make it challenging to have full bipartisan support to advance the bill.

Even so, the current pro-crypto regulators may still offer the much-needed guidelines for players to operate with clear rules for the road.


Final Summary

  • The SEC submitted proposed guidelines on how to treat crypto assets that fall within federal securities law.
  • CFTC also pushed for rules for prediction markets, with experts billing the updates as ‘better’ if the CLARITY Act stalls.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the SEC planning to establish for crypto assets, even if the CLARITY Act fails?

AThe SEC is planning to establish a 'token taxonomy' to help categorize crypto assets that fall under its jurisdiction.

QWhich U.S. regulatory body has pledged to unveil clear rules for prediction markets?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has pledged to unveil clear rules for prediction markets.

QWhat did the CFTC Chairman pledge to release by next month regarding crypto?

ACFTC Chairman Mike Selig pledged to unveil crypto perps (perpetuals) guidelines by next month.

QWhy did the CLARITY Act stall earlier in the year?

AThe CLARITY Act stalled because the crypto and banking industries failed to reach a stablecoin yield deal.

QAccording to the article, what would regulatory clarity from the SEC establish for crypto firms?

ARegulatory clarity would establish an enforceable framework that allows crypto firms to register with the regulator, conduct disclosure requirements, and engage with investors.

İlgili Okumalar

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit24 dk önce

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit24 dk önce

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit26 dk önce

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit26 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片