Samson Mow Proposes Renaming Hardware Wallets

cryptonews.ru2026-08-28 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-08-28 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Samson Mow, CEO of Jan3, has proposed renaming hardware wallets to “Bitcoin Signing Devices” (BSD). He argues the current term is misleading, as it suggests bitcoins are stored inside the physical device. Mow clarifies that bitcoin exists on the blockchain, and these devices merely store the private keys needed to sign and authorize transactions. The new terminology, “signing device,” more accurately reflects this core function and aligns with terms like “multi-signature.” He emphasizes that a hardware wallet acts more as a “key management tool” than a vault. Bitcoins remain safe on the blockchain even if the device is damaged, lost, or disconnected. Users can restore access to their assets on a new compatible device using their seed phrase. Mow noted that Ledger and its CEO Pascal Gauthier are already considering this change and hopes other manufacturers like Bitkey will adopt the new term. Previously, Mow had cautioned Bitcoin developers against rushing quantum-resistant solutions, warning they could create compatibility issues and reduce network efficiency.

According to the top manager, the new term provides a more accurate technical description of cold wallets. It will help overcome one of the most common misconceptions among novice crypto investors — that their bitcoins are stored inside the hardware device, Mow believes. In reality, bitcoin exists on the blockchain, and the device only stores the private keys necessary for accessing and authorizing transactions. The head of Jan3 is convinced that the term "Bitcoin signing device" is much closer in meaning to "secure transaction signing."

A hardware wallet functions not so much as a safe, but as a "key management tool." Even if a user disconnects the wallet from the internet, breaks the screen, or drains the battery, the bitcoins are not lost but remain on the blockchain. And if the device breaks or is lost, the person can restore access to their assets on a new compatible device if they have the seed phrase.

"'Signing' perfectly aligns with the term 'multisignature'. I will stop calling them hardware wallets and will use the term BSD. Manufacturer Ledger and its CEO Pascal Gauthier are already working on this. Let's see if we can get other manufacturers, including Bitkey, on board," wrote Samson Mow on social network X.

Previously, the CEO of Jan3 urged Bitcoin developers not to rush the launch of solutions to combat the quantum threat. He fears they could create compatibility issues between nodes and reduce network efficiency.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QWhat new term did Samson Mow propose for hardware wallets and why?

ASamson Mow proposed renaming hardware wallets to 'Bitcoin Signing Devices' (BSD). He believes this term provides a more accurate technical description, overcoming the common misconception that bitcoins are stored inside the physical device. It emphasizes that the device's primary function is to securely sign transactions by managing private keys.

QAccording to the article, what is a key technical misunderstanding about hardware wallets that the new term aims to address?

AThe key misunderstanding is that newcomers often believe their bitcoins are stored inside the hardware wallet itself. In reality, bitcoins exist on the blockchain, and the hardware device only stores the private keys needed to access and authorize transactions.

QWhat advantage does the term 'Bitcoin Signing Device' (BSD) have regarding multi-signature setups, according to Mow?

AMow stated that the term 'signing' perfectly aligns with the term 'multi-signature,' making BSD a more conceptually consistent name in the context of advanced Bitcoin security setups like multisig.

QWhat practical scenario is described to illustrate that bitcoins remain safe even if a hardware wallet is damaged?

AThe article explains that even if a user disconnects the wallet, breaks the screen, or drains the battery, the bitcoins are not lost; they remain on the blockchain. If the device is broken or lost, access to the assets can be restored on a new compatible device using the seed phrase.

QWhich hardware wallet manufacturer is already working on adopting the new terminology, as mentioned in Mow's statement?

AAccording to Samson Mow's post, the manufacturer Ledger and its CEO Pascal Gauthier are already working on adopting the new 'Bitcoin Signing Device' terminology.

İlgili Okumalar

Strive Executive: Rethinking the Bitcoin Price Flywheel

In this article, the author discusses the future trajectory of Bitcoin's price, moving beyond the traditional "power law" model that has described its long-term price appreciation with diminishing returns. The core argument is that Bitcoin is maturing, evidenced by declining volatility and shallower market drawdowns. This maturation, often seen as leading to permanently lower returns, is framed as a precursor to a new, potentially explosive phase. The author draws an analogy to metal fatigue, where cracks propagate in three stages: initial irregular formation, a predictable middle phase describable by a power law (Paris' law), and a final rapid acceleration leading to fracture. Similarly, Bitcoin's monetization is seen in three phases: 1) Discovery (high volatility/returns), 2) Maturation (declining volatility/returns, improving risk-adjusted metrics), and 3) System-driven monetization. The key insight is that Phase 2 sets the stage for Phase 3. Lower volatility makes Bitcoin a more attractive asset for large-scale capital allocation (due to improved Sharpe ratios) and, crucially, a higher-quality collateral for loans. As perceived credit risk falls, the financial system can safely extend more dollar-denominated credit against Bitcoin holdings. This creates a self-reinforcing "flywheel": lower volatility → more capital allocation & cheaper credit → increased demand for fixed-supply Bitcoin → price rise → higher collateral value enabling more credit → continued price pressure. The conclusion posits that even if Bitcoin adoption eventually plateaus (reaching an S-curve saturation), the expansion of capital and credit chasing a fixed supply could cause its USD price to re-accelerate, breaking above the long-term power-law trajectory and entering the "third region" of rapid, system-driven monetization.

marsbit5 saat önce

Strive Executive: Rethinking the Bitcoin Price Flywheel

marsbit5 saat önce

OpenAI Reveals Its Own Jalapeño Chip: Accelerator 1.5–2 Times More Efficient Than Nvidia

On August 25, 2026, OpenAI unveiled initial test results for its proprietary inference accelerator, the Jalapeño. Benchmarks on SemiAnalysis's InferenceX platform showed that systems using Jalapeño delivered 1.5–1.9 times more computations per watt at peak throughput and reduced latency by 1.7–3.6 times compared to systems based on Nvidia's GB200 and GB300, tested on models like GPT-OSS-120B. Designed specifically for OpenAI's own workloads, the 700W-rated chip was developed in nine months with partners Broadcom (silicon/network) and Celestica (boards/racks). It's the first in a planned multi-year platform. Deployment is slated for late 2026, backed by an OpenAI-Broadcom agreement to deploy 10 GW of custom accelerators through 2029. This move shifts a major portion of OpenAI's daily inference, crucial for services like ChatGPT and its API, away from Nvidia's universal GPUs. By controlling this hardware architecture, OpenAI aims to directly reduce the per-query cost of its massive service traffic, converting what was previously supplier profit (noting Nvidia's high margins) into internal savings and computational capacity. While OpenAI will still rely on external suppliers for training cutting-edge models and for parts of inference, Jalapeño represents a strategic industry trend where hyperscalers design custom chips once inference volume becomes predictable. However, this specialization risks future inflexibility if AI architectures shift and creates dependency on its manufacturing partners.

cryptonews.ru6 saat önce

OpenAI Reveals Its Own Jalapeño Chip: Accelerator 1.5–2 Times More Efficient Than Nvidia

cryptonews.ru6 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片