Ripple CEO Predicts 80% Chance Crypto Market Structure Bill Signed By End Of April

bitcoinist2026-02-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-02-18 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Anticipation is building around the CLARITY Act, a key digital asset market structure bill. According to reports, the White House is considering new talks as soon as Thursday to address the contentious issue of stablecoin yields, a previous meeting having ended without agreement. Banking representatives are firmly against stablecoins offering yield or rewards. Despite this, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse expressed strong confidence that differences will be resolved. He estimates an 80% chance the bill will be signed into law by the end of April, arguing that regulatory clarity, even in an imperfect bill, is better than the current chaos for the crypto sector.

As anticipation builds around the long-awaited digital asset market structure legislation known as the CLARITY Act, negotiations between the crypto industry and the banking sector appear to be resuming this week.

White House Considers New Crypto Talks

According to Crypto In America journalist Eleanor Terrett, the White House is weighing the possibility of holding another meeting as soon as Thursday to address one of the most contentious elements of the bill: stablecoin yield.

Citing two sources familiar with the discussions, Terrett reported that administration officials are considering convening representatives from both banks and crypto firms for renewed talks. However, she noted that no final decision has been made and plans have yet to be confirmed.

The potential meeting follows a previous round of discussions that ended without resolution. Terrett reported Monday that last Tuesday’s White House gathering — which included senior policy staff from major banks, crypto companies, and trade associations — concluded without an agreement.

According to her reporting, banking representatives circulated a one-page document titled “Yield and Interest Prohibition Principles.” The document argued that stablecoins should not offer yield or rewards, drawing a firm line that has become a central sticking point in the broader negotiations.

Despite the setback, Ripple Chief Executive Officer Brad Garlinghouse has publicly expressed confidence that the crypto and banking sectors will ultimately bridge their differences, clearing the way for final approval of the legislation and its signing by President Donald Trump.

Ripple CEO Says ‘Clarity Is Better Than Chaos’

In comments reported Tuesday by The Street, Garlinghouse suggested that once the remaining disputes are resolved, the CLARITY Act could move swiftly toward enactment. He even alluded to a potential timeline, signaling urgency around the process.

Garlinghouse called on the crypto community to rally behind the legislation rather than hold out for a flawless outcome. He argued that progress should not be derailed by disagreements over specific provisions.

“I think it’s so clear that clarity is better than chaos,” he said, emphasizing that regulatory certainty would benefit the entire sector. While acknowledging that the CLARITY Act is not perfect, Garlinghouse maintained that no piece of legislation ever is.

Garlinghouse went further, estimating there is an 80% probability that the anticipated crypto market structure bill will be signed into law by the end of April.

The daily chart shows the total market cap at $2.3 trillion as of Tuesday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the name of the digital asset market structure legislation discussed in the article?

AThe CLARITY Act.

QAccording to Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, what is the probability that the crypto market structure bill will be signed by the end of April?

AHe estimates an 80% probability.

QWhat is the central sticking point in the negotiations between the crypto industry and the banking sector?

AThe central sticking point is the debate over whether stablecoins should be allowed to offer yield or rewards.

QWho reported that the White House is considering holding another meeting to discuss stablecoin yield?

ACrypto In America journalist Eleanor Terrett.

QWhat was the title of the one-page document circulated by banking representatives at the previous White House meeting?

A"Yield and Interest Prohibition Principles."

İlgili Okumalar

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit10 dk önce

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit10 dk önce

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit23 dk önce

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit23 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片