PIPPIN down 13%: Smart money selling, long squeeze, and…

ambcrypto2026-01-25 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-01-25 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

PIPPIN's price crashed over 13% in 24 hours, extending monthly losses to 36%, significantly underperforming the broader crypto market. On-chain data indicates smart money offloaded over $675K of PIPPIN, contributing to heavy sell pressure. The price broke below an ascending trendline, entering a bearish structure and trading choppily between $0.28 and $0.50. A long squeeze accelerated the decline, while traders are now clustering liquidity bets around the $0.39-$0.42 zone, a potential target for a bounce. However, continued selling pressure and market-wide capital rotation from memecoins to stable assets like BTC and ETH suggest ongoing risks. A breakdown below key support at $0.29 could trigger further declines.

PIPPIN price crashed by more than 13% in the past 24 hours, extending the losses to about 36% this month. The memecoin underperformed the crypto market, which was nearly flat over the past few weeks.

Technically, the memecoin is undergoing a deeper correction, which is evident on the charts and in the chain activity.

Smart money offloading PIPPIN

As per StalkChain data, PIPPIN was the most sold token in the last 24 hours. The smart money offloaded more than $675K Pippin [PIPPIN] during this period.

This withdrawal of capital from the memecoin resulted in the sell pressure that brought the memecoin down.

Other memes in this category were Fartcoin [FARTCOIN], WHITEWHALE, and PENGUIN. Inclusion of USDC in this list meant that traders were locking in profits or cutting their losses.

Again, the correction was market-wide, specifically for memecoins. This is because traders were moving from the high-risk tokens like memes to more stable assets like Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH].

PIPPIN price remains choppy

While the smart money is bearish with their actions, the PIPPIN price has been choppy since reaching a peak around $0.70. The memecoin had broken below the ascending trendline, which indicated the price was trading in a bearish structure.

Even the small pumps that were happening between mid-December and now were insignificant, as the price could not break past this consolidation.

The Choppiness Index (CHOP), which was at 49, showed that the PIPPIN price was bouncing between $0.28 and $0.50. This is after peaking around 60, which meant that the price had no clear direction yet.

Furthermore, the seller’s momentum was contributing to this decline in the price of PIPPIN. The red bars were gradually increasing in size as the price approached the support level around $0.29.

Historical data showed that every time the PIPPIN price hit the aforementioned support level, it was followed by a bounce back. That suggested it could rise to $0.40 as the first target.

Conversely, a breakdown of the level would accelerate the decline, increasing the losses. However, this was not guaranteed, as bets to the upside were hitting the markets.

Liquidity magnet sitting above price action

As per CoinGlass data, traders were now betting on price, activating the orders at the $0.39 level. Positions worth thousands of dollars were clustered between $0.39 and $0.42, price magnets that could pull PIPPIN toward this zone.

The clusters came after the liquidation of long orders sitting below $0.36. The long squeeze accelerated the breakdown on the charts.

That said, choppiness on the charts, smart money’s selling pressure, capital rotation, and a long squeeze all contributed to the price crash.


Final Thoughts

  • PIPPIN price declined by 13%, extending the monthly losses to 36%.
  • PIPPIN could bounce back to $0.39, where liquidity clusters were price magnets.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat was the percentage decline in PIPPIN's price over the past 24 hours and this month?

APIPPIN's price crashed by more than 13% in the past 24 hours, extending the losses to about 36% this month.

QAccording to StalkChain data, what was the primary action of 'smart money' regarding PIPPIN in the last 24 hours?

AAccording to StalkChain data, PIPPIN was the most sold token in the last 24 hours, with smart money offloading more than $675K worth of it.

QWhat does the Choppiness Index (CHOP) value of 49 indicate about the PIPPIN price action?

AA Choppiness Index (CHOP) value of 49 shows that the PIPPIN price was bouncing between $0.28 and $0.50 with no clear directional trend.

QWhat is the significance of the liquidity clusters between $0.39 and $0.42 for the PIPPIN price?

AThe liquidity clusters between $0.39 and $0.42 are price magnets that could potentially pull the PIPPIN price toward that zone, as traders have placed orders there.

QWhat are the two possible price scenarios mentioned for PIPPIN if it reaches the key support level around $0.29?

AHistorically, the price has bounced back from the $0.29 support level, potentially rising to $0.40. Conversely, a breakdown below this level would accelerate the decline and increase losses.

İlgili Okumalar

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

The article explains that the key to profiting on Polymarket, a prediction market platform, lies not just predicting real-world events correctly, but in meticulously understanding the specific rules that govern how each market will be resolved. It illustrates this with examples, such as a market on Venezuela's 2026 leader, where the official rules defining "officially holds" the office overruled the intuitive answer of who was in practical control. Other examples include debates over the definition of a "token" or what constitutes an "agreement." The core argument is that a "reality vs. rules" gap creates pricing discrepancies that savvy traders ("车头" or "whales") exploit. The platform has a formal dispute resolution process managed by UMA token holders to settle ambiguous outcomes. This process involves proposal submission, a challenge window, a discussion period, and a final vote. However, the article highlights a critical flaw in this system compared to a traditional court: the lack of separation between the arbiters (UMA voters) and the interested parties (traders with financial stakes in the outcome). This conflict of interest undermines the discussion phase, leads to herd mentality, and results in opaque final decisions without explanatory rulings. Consequently, the system lacks a body of precedent, making it difficult for users to learn from past disputes. The ultimate takeaway is that success on Polymarket requires a lawyer-like scrutiny of the rules to identify and capitalize on the cognitive gap between how events appear and how they are contractually defined for settlement.

marsbit1 saat önce

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片