On-Chain Whales' New Battleground: Hyperliquid Confronts Wall Street and Compliance Challenges

比推2026-03-17 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-17 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Hyperliquid, a leading decentralized exchange (Perp DEX) for perpetual futures, is rapidly expanding beyond crypto into traditional finance, particularly through its HIP-3 market for real-world assets (RWAs) like commodities and indices. With a monthly trading volume of $173.4 billion and over 172.9 million users, it has become a hub for institutional and large-scale traders, with the top 100 addresses accounting for over 81% of total trading activity. Recent geopolitical events, such as the U.S.-Iran conflict, have highlighted Hyperliquid’s role in providing 24/7 price discovery for assets like WTI crude oil, attracting attention from mainstream financial media like Bloomberg. This positions Hyperliquid as a emerging competitor to traditional markets like CME. However, its growth brings regulatory challenges. As U.S. regulators, including the CFTC, move toward approving crypto perpetual futures, Hyperliquid faces pressure to comply with financial regulations while preserving its permissionless, non-custodial nature. To address this, it has established a policy center in Washington, D.C., led by Jake Chervinsky, to engage with regulators and shape a legal framework for DeFi. The platform’s future depends on balancing innovation with compliance as it seeks to become a sustainable part of the global financial infrastructure.

Author: Nancy, PANews

Original Title: Hyperliquid "Invades" Wall Street: A Playground for On-Chain Whales, Facing Compliance Pressure

The narrative of on-chain finance is rapidly expanding into global markets.

Within less than a week, multiple mainstream media outlets have turned their attention to Hyperliquid. This Perp DEX, which previously focused on crypto derivatives, is experiencing a "breakout moment," with decentralized pricing power becoming a focal point of discussion on Wall Street. However, as the volume of on-chain transactions continues to grow, the balance between decentralized innovation and compliance regulation is becoming an unavoidable challenge.

HIP-3 Invades Mainstream Finance, Hyperliquid is a Whale Playground

As a leading Perp DEX, Hyperliquid is continuously widening the gap with its competitors and gradually becoming an emerging infrastructure force in mainstream financial markets.

According to DeFiLlama data, as of March 16, Hyperliquid's monthly trading volume reached $173.42 billion, far surpassing similar platforms.

RWA (Real World Asset) trading is a significant growth driver for Hyperliquid recently. Platform data shows that in the past 24 hours alone, its perpetual futures trading volume reached $5.4 billion, with the HIP-3 sector contributing approximately 21.3% (about $1.15 billion).

HIP-3 deploys perpetual futures markets for various assets such as commodities and stock indices. Among these traditional assets on HIP-3, WTI crude oil, silver, Brent crude oil, and XYZ100 currently show the most significant demand and activity, with WTI crude oil's daily trading volume accounting for over 35% of the total.

Behind the rapid expansion of trading scale is the influx of a large number of whale players into Hyperliquid, whose global user base has exceeded 1.729 million. Further analysis by Hyperliquid Hub, an ecosystem data analysis service, points out that Hyperliquid's total trading volume has reached a staggering $411 trillion, with the top 100 addresses contributing over $334 trillion, accounting for 81.3% of all trading volume. The top 200 addresses account for almost 98.81%, leaving only about 1.19% of the trading volume for the remaining addresses.

Clearly, Hyperliquid is not a playground for retail investors but is dominated by a small number of well-funded, highly active traders, such as institutions, whales, high-frequency traders, and professional market makers.

Looking further, the number of unique traders on HIP-3 has accumulated to over 1.85 million (Note: the same wallet connecting on different days is counted as two separate wallets), with over 810,000 new traders added in the past month alone, further confirming the demand for tokenized asset trading.

The recent significant growth in HIP-3 business is directly linked to the US-Iran conflict event, making Hyperliquid a new hub for global macro trading. Mainstream media outlets like Bloomberg, Wall Street News, and Fortune, in recent reports, directly referenced Hyperliquid's crude oil contracts as a price reference and pointed out that before the CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) opened on Monday, Hyperliquid had already completed price discovery over the weekend, becoming a real-time window for global macro assets.

It is by seizing TradFi pricing power, liquidity vacuums, and macro hedging demand that Hyperliquid has begun to truly "invade" mainstream financial markets.

Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer of Bitwise, also stated that the US-Iran event has put the non-stop crypto market in the spotlight. In the past, if a major geopolitical shock occurred on a Sunday morning, investors typically had to wait for the US futures market to open on Sunday at 6 PM (Eastern Time) to understand its impact. Now, they can directly turn to 24/7 on-chain trading platforms to execute trades in real-time. The shift of the financial industry to on-chain is an irreversible trend, like a ball rolling down a hill, unstoppable and far faster than imagined. However, there are still barriers to participating in on-chain markets, including familiarity with wallets, stablecoins, and platforms like Hyperliquid and Uniswap. (Related reading: Beyond Wall Street Time, Traditional Asset Pricing Power Shifts On-Chain)

Faced with this rapidly developing trend of on-chain finance, traditional financial players like Nasdaq and CME have also begun to lay out tokenized trading businesses to seize future market opportunities for themselves.

Crypto Perpetual Futures May Land in the US Next Month, Hyperliquid Faces Compliance Challenges Head-On

Since last year, the Perp DEX market has witnessed a significant explosion in liquidity.

A recent CoinGecko report pointed out that DEX perpetual futures surged to $6.7 trillion in 2025, an increase of about 346% compared to the previous year, while CEX open interest fell by 20.8% during the same period. Behind this trend is the rise of perpetual DEXs like Hyperliquid and Lighter, also reflecting the large-scale migration of funds from CEXs to DEXs.

The gradual clarification of the regulatory environment is further amplifying the development space of the perpetual futures market, making more mainstream capital willing to enter this field. Recently, Mike Selig, Chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), also discussed the regulatory progress of crypto perpetual futures and prediction markets in a public speech. He stated that the CFTC is working to launch true perpetual futures in the US and expects to announce relevant policies in about a month to attract liquidity back to the US while providing investors with more comprehensive protection. Selig also pointed out that in the past, due to regulatory uncertainty, a large amount of liquidity flowed overseas, and the CFTC is cooperating with US SEC Chairman Paul Atkins to advance Project Crypto to coordinate and promote digital asset regulatory reform.

However, regulatory clarity could also lead to another outcome. Once the permissionless, intermediary-free on-chain trading path is broken due to compliance requirements, the core appeal of Perp DEXs may be significantly diminished, and they will directly face competition from compliant crypto platforms and traditional financial institutions.

In fact, for many users, besides factors such as incentive mechanisms, self-custody needs, capital efficiency, and hedging demand, the lack of KYC is also an important reason attracting funds to on-chain trading.

For example, on-chain analyst Eye previously posted that some institutional trading parties active on Hyperliquid showed obvious discomfort after their on-chain trading wallets were identified, even actively contacting the analyst to pressure them to stop disclosing information, often related to the possibility of losing trades being known to the outside world.

If Hyperliquid hopes to be seen as a legitimate participant in the new financial system, it may have to accept and comply with corresponding regulatory rules. Especially in the context of previous controversial cases involving token manipulation and insider trading on the platform, its compliance pressure may further increase.

To address regulatory challenges, Hyperliquid formally established the Hyperliquid Policy Center in Washington, D.C., in February, with veteran crypto lawyer Jake Chervinsky as its first CEO. The center aims to create a legal path for the widespread adoption of DeFi in the US, help Congress and federal agencies understand the underlying technology of DeFi, and provide professional support for regulatory rule-making.

Chervinsky stated that the current regulatory framework was formed in the "analog era" and struggles to encompass new trading forms like decentralized protocols. One of the policy center's primary tasks is to develop a legal framework for perpetual contracts. To support its operation, the affiliated Hyperliquid Foundation has donated 1 million platform native tokens HYPE (currently worth approximately $28 million).

Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff Yan emphasized in a recent interview that he wants the platform to "be used forever," not to fade away quickly with market hype. He also stressed distinguishing Hyperliquid Labs from the Hyperliquid platform and ecosystem, and is committed to building Hyperliquid into a financially neutral platform, providing sustainable infrastructure for the development of on-chain perpetual contracts and decentralized finance.

When DeFi attempts to challenge traditional finance, compliance has become a prerequisite for opening up larger markets. This is not only a test for Hyperliquid but also a reality that other DEXs and even the entire DeFi track must face head-on.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620373

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is Hyperliquid and what role is it playing in the global financial markets according to the article?

AHyperliquid is a decentralized exchange (Perp DEX) that started with crypto derivatives but has expanded to include real-world assets (RWA) like commodities and indices. It is becoming a new infrastructure force in mainstream finance, acting as a global macro trading hub and challenging traditional financial pricing power, especially during events like the US-Iran conflict when it provided real-time price discovery before traditional markets opened.

QHow significant is the trading volume and user concentration on Hyperliquid, and what does it indicate about its user base?

AHyperliquid's monthly trading volume reached $1734.2 billion as of March 16. The platform is dominated by a small number of large players; the top 100 addresses contributed over 81.3% of the total $4.34 trillion in historical trading volume, and the top 200 addresses accounted for nearly 98.81%. This indicates that the platform is primarily used by institutions, whales, high-frequency traders, and professional market makers, not retail散户 investors.

QWhat is HIP-3 on Hyperliquid and which assets are most actively traded within it?

AHIP-3 is a sector on Hyperliquid that deploys perpetual futures markets for various traditional assets like commodities and stock indices. The most active and in-demand assets are WTI crude oil, silver, Brent crude oil, and XYZ100. WTI crude oil alone accounted for over 35% of the daily trading volume in this sector.

QWhat regulatory challenges does Hyperliquid face as it grows, and how is it addressing them?

AHyperliquid faces compliance challenges as decentralized finance (DeFi) innovation clashes with regulatory frameworks. The need for KYC and adherence to rules could diminish its permissionless appeal. To address this, Hyperliquid established the Hyperliquid Policy Center in Washington D.C., led by lawyer Jake Chervinsky, to help create a legal path for DeFi adoption in the U.S. and donated $28 million worth of HYPE tokens to support its operation.

QAccording to the CFTC Chairman, what is the expected timeline for crypto perpetual futures to be officially launched in the U.S., and why is this significant?

ACFTC Chairman Mike Selig stated that he expects policies for 'true crypto perpetual futures' to be unveiled in the U.S. within about a month. This is significant because clearer regulations are expected to attract liquidity back to the U.S. and provide better investor protection, potentially increasing mainstream capital inflow into the perpetual合约 market.

İlgili Okumalar

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2 saat önce

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2 saat önce

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2 saat önce

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist2 saat önce

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist2 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3 saat önce

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3 saat önce

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3 saat önce

marsbit3 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot

Futures