Is XRP The Solution To Everything? Ripple President Drops Bombshell That Changes Everything

bitcoinist2026-04-05 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-04-05 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

Ripple President Monica Long highlighted decentralized identities (DIDs) as a key area for XRP dominance, stating they allow users to reclaim control from web2 companies. By tokenizing identities on the XRP Ledger (XRPL) using zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), individuals can make their identities portable and delegate access securely. This enables verification without revealing sensitive data, such as KYC or DNA. The XRPL is advancing with ZK technology, having executed its first privacy transaction on testnet via the DNA Protocol. This innovation allows institutions to confirm compliance without accessing actual data, combining privacy with regulatory needs. ZK technology is expected to enhance scalability and attract institutional use. XRP was trading around $1.31 at the time of writing.

Ripple President Monica Long has highlighted decentralized identities as another area in which XRP could dominate. This came as she explained why these decentralized identities are a game-changer.

Ripple President Reveals Another Key Area For XRP

In an X post, crypto pundit John Squire drew attention to the Ripple President’s statement in which she noted that decentralized identities will enable users to take back control of their identities from web2 companies. With decentralized identities, individuals will be able to tokenize their identities on a network such as XRP Ledger (XRPL).

Long noted that this tokenization will make these decentralized identities transportable and enable individuals to delegate access to whoever they want. John Squire described decentralized identities as a game-changer. He noted that individuals will be able to turn their identity, KYC, and even DNA into a private portable token on the XRP Ledger using zero-knowledge proofs.

The pundit added that the decentralized identities will enable everyone to prove everything without revealing anything. The XRP Ledger is already making progress with zero-knowledge proofs as the network looks to provide privacy for network users. Crypto pundit Pumpius recently highlighted how the network has made history with the first-ever zero-knowledge (ZK) privacy transaction going live on the testnet.

The pundit stated that the DNA Protocol was responsible for these ZK privacy transactions on the XRP Ledger. The protocol turned real-world data into a ZK proof, verified on-chain with zero sensitive information exposed. Pumpius added that with plans to implement ZK proof on the XRPL, banks, governments, and institutions can now confirm everything. This includes KYC, medical records, financials, and compliance, without ever seeing the actual data.

ZK Technology Will Be A Game Changer On XRPL

Ripple’s Head of Research, Aanchal Malhotra, said that it will be great for the XRP Ledger to implement zero-knowledge technology. She noted that this will enable several use cases and that there are many innovative applications they can build with this technology. ZK technology will enable several privacy features, which would further attract institutions to the network.

Crypto pundit Minus noted that ZK technology will enable privacy without sacrificing compliance. Furthermore, he said that this would lead to selective disclosure and “insane scalability.” That way, “Institutions can finally have their cake and eat it too,” he added.

It is worth noting that the XRP Ledger is already moving to implement privacy features natively on the network, including Permissioned Domains, which enable institutions to restrict access to authorized users. The network has also enabled Confidential Multi-Purpose Tokens (Confidential MPTs), which hide the balances and transaction amounts.

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $1.31, down in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.31 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

İlgili Sorular

QWhat key area for XRP did Ripple President Monica Long highlight in her recent statement?

AMonica Long highlighted decentralized identities as another key area in which XRP could dominate, enabling users to take back control of their identities from web2 companies.

QHow does John Squire describe the potential of decentralized identities on the XRP Ledger?

AJohn Squire described decentralized identities as a game-changer, allowing individuals to turn their identity, KYC, and even DNA into a private portable token on the XRP Ledger using zero-knowledge proofs, enabling them to prove everything without revealing anything.

QWhat recent technological milestone was achieved on the XRP Ledger testnet related to privacy?

AThe first-ever zero-knowledge (ZK) privacy transaction went live on the XRP Ledger testnet, implemented by the DNA Protocol, which turns real-world data into a ZK proof verified on-chain without exposing sensitive information.

QAccording to Ripple's Head of Research, why is implementing zero-knowledge technology great for the XRP Ledger?

AAanchal Malhotra stated that implementing zero-knowledge technology on the XRP Ledger will enable several use cases and innovative applications, providing privacy features that would further attract institutions to the network.

QWhat are some existing privacy features already implemented or being developed on the XRP Ledger?

AThe XRP Ledger is implementing privacy features natively, including Permissioned Domains to restrict access to authorized users and Confidential Multi-Purpose Tokens (Confidential MPTs) to hide balances and transaction amounts.

İlgili Okumalar

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News13 dk önce

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News13 dk önce

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit30 dk önce

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit30 dk önce

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手41 dk önce

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手41 dk önce

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit56 dk önce

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit56 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片